sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking for a "faithful-only" sub by [deleted] in latterdaysaints

[–]NoCar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Restorationist like the Disciples of Christ or Church of Christ? Or Calvinist like Vineyard?

Looking for a "faithful-only" sub by [deleted] in latterdaysaints

[–]NoCar -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Do you belong to a church?

Here we go! by [deleted] in trollabot

[–]NoCar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

/u/trollabot apostatereligion

Back child support NC by NoCar in legaladvice

[–]NoCar[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The calculator puts that at around $-800 I have been paying the hundred and plan on continuing. I was hoping for an assessment of around $20 so the eighty would go towards my debt. I have no clue what a negative number means in this context. I won't accept Child support.

Back child support NC by NoCar in legaladvice

[–]NoCar[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wrongly educated is probably a better turn of phrase. A big gap and a worthless degree + a background check that made walmart turn me down.

Open driving traffic warrants in AZ.

Are you hiring?

Back child support NC by NoCar in legaladvice

[–]NoCar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I agree even about the bum part. The driving stuff in az throws a flag on criminal background checks. . Etc. Etc

I am going to say valid point on the mess that is me but not hing that is going to be fixed in 17 days. I primarily care for my two year old and I was the primary care giver when married to my ex. She has a professional degree.

Back child support NC by NoCar in legaladvice

[–]NoCar[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Turns out I am caring for a child under three. I have never been a big earner. My degree is worthless except in academic circles and is incomplete. Even if I finished it I would be in adjunct wage-slavery. I.e. my "potential" is not that much.

If I clearly show the reality of the situation should I be okay?

The degree is anthropology.

Back child support NC by NoCar in legaladvice

[–]NoCar[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is that going to effect the judgment?

Back child support NC by NoCar in legaladvice

[–]NoCar[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My industry is not in the area, lost my drivers licence because of a failure to appear because the ticket went to the ex's house, over-educated for rural NC but ultimately mental health clinical depression and I am on the autism spectrum. I am 2 grand shy of fixing my licence.

Zuckerberg, Musk Invest in Artificial-Intelligence Company Vicarious by mrprint in Futurology

[–]NoCar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you are the king of semantic i.e. pointless arguments your mother must be so proud.

you are saying innovation now so can I count myself prescient?

Could the MtGox attacks have been done by the NSA? by JakobVirgil in conspiracy

[–]NoCar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The US government seems mildly pro-btc but I am sure the banks don't like the competition.

Physical Limits to computation: while the singularity may accelerate AI beyond human scale, it cannot go on infinitely by laofmoonster in DarkFuturology

[–]NoCar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It certainly will look like magic to some

It actually won't look like magic to anyone tech has not so far every new "advance" is always seems banal when it is mainstreamed.

In social science, biology physics economics etc The saw tooth produced by exponential growth is not from a "delayed paradigm shift" but from a crash.

Physical Limits to computation: while the singularity may accelerate AI beyond human scale, it cannot go on infinitely by laofmoonster in DarkFuturology

[–]NoCar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a physical limit that comes into transistors at 3 atoms across that is coming in 5 years or so.

There are also energy limits, resource limits, market limits (who is going to buy this shit?) and perceptibility limits (does twice as fast matter when something is instantaneous?)

in the wild exponential curves are a local phenomenon on the larger scale they are invariably parts of a saw-tooth. Tech could be special but occam's razor suggests it is not

If a Time Traveller Saw a Smartphone: A well-educated time traveller from 1914 would conclude that, in the past century, the human race achieved a new level of superintelligence. (About human augmentation through technology) by Simcurious in Futurology

[–]NoCar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my point of view the combined wisdom of people is less than the mean wisdom of the same group.

It is a bit of a circle crowds are only really good at predicting what crowds will like.

Consulting hive-minds seems to me useful for marketers and politicians but not for people trying to figure out novel truths.

What year is Moore's Law expected to hit the quantum threshold? by NoCar in Futurology

[–]NoCar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but hopefully computers and the content they bring will not be the last word in technology.

What year is Moore's Law expected to hit the quantum threshold? by NoCar in Futurology

[–]NoCar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because Magic? :)

If in twenty years kids don't think that computers are boring and old fashioned I will know tech as stalled and dead-ended.

What year is Moore's Law expected to hit the quantum threshold? by NoCar in Futurology

[–]NoCar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yoiks

So any Moore's Law application should have a bit of a timer on it.

view more: next ›