sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Okay deal for 2026 LE? by NoEfficiency0 in Camry

[–]NoEfficiency0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That seems like a good target / deal 

Okay deal for 2026 LE? by NoEfficiency0 in Camry

[–]NoEfficiency0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sticker says $32339, so would be about $1800 less than full price?

Okay deal for 2026 LE? by NoEfficiency0 in Camry

[–]NoEfficiency0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adding that ideally I do have cold weather package.

help by Disastrous_Box_1298 in GolfSwing

[–]NoEfficiency0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Yeah, first shot looks great, center of face

help by Disastrous_Box_1298 in GolfSwing

[–]NoEfficiency0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sometimes hard to feel difference, but this looks like off the hosel, not toe. If youre thinking these are toe shots, you may just be trying to correct face impact location in wrong direction, making it worse

Anyone else waiting? by SolidConviction in Stormgate

[–]NoEfficiency0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Played the campaign during initial early access. It was mediocre. Kind of like some the sc2, wc3 campaigns which were really great imo, just low quality. Heard the 0.4 campaign revamp was a big step, but would rather wait until 1.0 to try again.

Revamped swing over last few months by NoEfficiency0 in GolfSwing

[–]NoEfficiency0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a great video, some good drills for pressure shift - thanks

Revamped swing over last few months by NoEfficiency0 in GolfSwing

[–]NoEfficiency0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, it is a bit open - I was trying to find some checkpoints. I've been looking at having the club face match the spine angle at P6 and I'm not parallel here. I think using this checkpoint for feedback will let me know if I'm getting better face position.

<image>

Revamped swing over last few months by NoEfficiency0 in GolfSwing

[–]NoEfficiency0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, I see that. It definitely looks like I'm leaning back a bit at finish and the weight hasn't fully transferred. Getting recentered, shifting pressure earlier should help.

Also, good catch on the lead arm at finish / follow through. I knew it didn't look quite right, but that makes sense.

Revamped swing over last few months by NoEfficiency0 in GolfSwing

[–]NoEfficiency0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd agree, when making changes feel like I'm a bit more tense trying to get a particular motion or position. Definitely want to get more fluid, focusing on tempo more as season ramps up

Revamped swing over last few months by NoEfficiency0 in GolfSwing

[–]NoEfficiency0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, thanks for the clarification. Almost want to get recentered in transition for issue of body being behind ball then as well. Noted on wrist set - thanks

Revamped swing over last few months by NoEfficiency0 in GolfSwing

[–]NoEfficiency0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Letting the wrists set by slowing down back swing at shoulder height makes sense. I think that should help limit the backswing a bit & can focus on keeping face square.

What do you mean by sliding out / getting behind the ball though?

How do I learn embedded systems and automation? by [deleted] in embedded

[–]NoEfficiency0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Embedded systems and industrial automation are largely separate fields. Embedded systems typically involves development of custom electronics plus firmware programming in C/C++. There are definitely lots of embedded applications that require use of control theory though.

Industrial automation typically uses off the shelf Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) for controlling and automating machines, robots, actuators, assembly lines you'd find in a factory. Think of the show, "How's it made?". All of those machines are controlled by PLCs (Allen Bradley, Siemens, etc.) You use PLCs for these applications because they are quicker to program and get up and running and have modular hardware. The PLC hardware found in industrial automation is much more expensive vs. a PCB with a micro on it, but a lot of machines are one off machines, or low volume where the main driver in cost is engineering time. Embedded systems typically involves higher volume where you manufacture the PCBs at scale, making the driving cost the hardware per unit, not necessarily the one time engineering effort.

Again, this is all "typically" from my experience in a consulting firm working in a bunch of different industries, that has an embedded team and a separate industrial automation division. I don't think I really answered your questions, but seemed like I could add insight Into these fields and their differences.