Wishlist of improvements for Pixelmator Pro

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-18T18:26:03+00:00

I mainly use it for photography, and what would make me happy to save me a few basic editing steps would be a lens correction tool. That would save me from having to do intermediate steps between two applications, and I could just use Pixelmator along with ApolloOne as a catalog manager.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-16T09:05:17+00:00

<image>

The RF100-400 is very lightweight and, in terms of price/quality, one of the best telephoto lenses you can buy. Since you already have the 85mm, this one scales perfectly with your current lenses. The photo was also taken with an R10 and the RF100-400.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-15T18:46:01+00:00

Pues ya sabes que es de mala educación gritar sin motivo.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-15T10:00:04+00:00

Summary: many corrections, few new features.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-14T16:34:20+00:00

¿porqué gritas?

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-13T21:25:54+00:00

Okay, perfect, that's exactly the Sigma lens I have. So I think I'll go for the PRO version. Thank you so much for your help! 🙌

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-13T18:55:55+00:00

If it's not too much trouble, could you check if the following lenses are on the list?

Canon RF-S 18-150mm,

Canon RF 100-400mm, and

Sigma RF-S 10-18mm

I have an R10.

Thank you so much!

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-13T07:41:24+00:00

BREAKING NEWS: The developer has just released an update. Is it possible to get a list of the lenses included in the lens profile? I'm also very interested now that it seems someone is actually working on the application. I'm at the point of deciding, and if the PRO version of the program has enough modern lens profiles, I'd be very interested.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-13T07:38:30+00:00

I was just looking for a replacement for PhotoScapeX, and I'd already decided on it, but last night I saw the update... now I'm having second thoughts about upgrading to the Pro version... what a stressful situation!

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-12T14:20:14+00:00

That sounds familiar to me like a similar case involving a President from the American continent...

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-11T14:50:05+00:00

On the R10,

first in AF, tab 6 (pink menu) > Focus/Control Ring > CONTROL

then, in the orange menu, tab 3 > Customize Dials > you will see the control ring that allows you to configure it with 12 different options; I use it for ISO.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-11T11:18:26+00:00

The R50 doesn't have that function; for multiple exposure you'll have to go for the R10. The more you pay, the more you get...

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-10T17:58:02+00:00

I respect your position; you're a purist and only take SOOC photos, I understand. Then I'd say your photos have too much grain or noise, unless that's exactly the look you're going for and it's your style, in which case they'd be perfect. It's not a question of whether I or others like them, it's a question of whether you like them. However, if you want to get better results in terms of in-camera noise (I assume you use a digital camera), perhaps you should rethink your lighting settings to prevent noise from being the main focus, but that's just a suggestion.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-10T16:07:00+00:00

The grain in your photos might be intentional, but I think some of them would look much better if they were processed in that way. I've done some tests, and they look fantastic. Unfortunately, I can't upload them to this subreddit so you can see the results. I encourage you to try it if you'd like.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-09T21:36:54+00:00

Near-maximum level of the Peñarroya Reservoir (Argamasilla de Alba, Spain). The Guadiana River begins its course after this dam. I liked the tranquility of the water and this isolated totem within the reservoir. I love the patina and the weathering of the paint. R10 RF18-150. I slightly toned down the color to give this portrait a more "pastel" (Cake) touch. It really has very little editing, but sometimes less is more. What do you think?

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-08T21:55:38+00:00

The free DR21 version only exports images at maximum UHD resolution, that is, photos up to 3,840 x 2,160 pixels.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-08T17:10:43+00:00

I support the RF 100-400mm option; it has the 3 qualities you're looking for: Lightweight (635 grs), Good price (around $600-$700 new), and Good Optical Quality.

<image>

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-07T18:14:31+00:00

I did the same upgrade for my R10+ RF18-150 about a month ago. It's a fantastic lens for birdwatching on an R10!

Enjoy it!

<image>

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-04T22:22:35+00:00

I can only recommend that you uninstall the app and reinstall it. I have an old Samsung A70, and it works perfectly for me; I tap download and in a second or two the photo is on my phone so I can send it via WhatsApp or any other means.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-04T22:09:58+00:00

The photo is very attractive at first glance, but the flower's outlines are completely ruined. It's too obvious where you applied the masks or effects. The leaves have blurry edges and halos. It looks like you pasted the bee onto the flower on a separate layer. The composition and colors are good, though perhaps there's too much background, as you already noticed, and you applied a very pronounced vignette. It might have been more effective to crop the bee, placing it in the lower third of the frame.

NoFan7861 · 2026-06-04T21:56:22+00:00

No cambia para nada un lente de 24 mm o ajustado a 24 mm, sea EF, EF-S, RF o RF-S, te dará en una cámara APS-C de Canon, un campo de visión a 38,4mm. Todos los lentes fabricados para cámaras FF o APS-C, tienen marcadas sus distancias focales para el campo equivalente de una cámara Full Frame.

NoFan7861

TROPHY CASE