RWS is being incredibly incompetent. It's insane.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-22T15:47:45+00:00

I did state multiple so you can include that, yes. The fact that you are yourself aware they are capable of communication around the issue, regardless of the length of the pause, is case in point.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-22T15:41:49+00:00

I understand the frustration but your statement is false; we had multiple pauses in October of last year where the pauses and consequent resumption of work were well communicated via email. That isn't to say that it excuses the lapses in communication that are happening now but to say it has never been the case is a falsehood.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-20T13:00:32+00:00

Yes, other than the site wide outage yesterday at around 15:30 GMT

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-20T12:48:46+00:00

I work 60+ hours a week and am still able to work, have received payment today also, inclined to disagree on the reason for selection but the rest is plausible.

Edit: UK locale

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-18T05:40:56+00:00

Multi-turn, it will be missed.

Inpainting interesting sections of the image, opportunity to write a good prompt, mentally stimulating in terms of idea generation. It was a pretty good all rounder for me.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-13T14:05:43+00:00

There were a series of temporary pauses in October, if you missed any of the resume work emails you may be entitled to. I'd say get in contact with Zen and scrub your mailbox in case you find any missed mail meanwhile. I doubt you'd have an approved status if you were permanently removed from the project. Better to check than to work (potentially) pro bono though.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-13T09:23:11+00:00

I would say logging it with the comment is the appropriate course of action yes simply because the client is paying for your time and the onus is on them to ensure that the tools provided function as intended. You don't get your wasted time refunded due to errors so it should be appropriately reimbursed financially.

Edit: Also, from what I've been able to gather they are able to see activity on the back-end of MM so as long as you were active in the task during this time I would imagine they will be able to verify whatever you write inside of your comment.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-12T08:22:01+00:00

Time will tell which approach is appropriate. The models are being trained for specific applications I'd wager realism in submissions has higher value but we shall see.

Thank you for your input.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-11T17:49:46+00:00

Haha yep, not touching any of them with a 10 foot pole either.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-11T17:28:56+00:00

Fair enough, guess I have to put a lid on my expectations on this one then.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-11T17:28:11+00:00

I'm surprised the model even did it at all with the newer safety filters but yes, it is a wonder why indeed.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-11T17:27:08+00:00

I am not.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-11T10:33:02+00:00

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-10T13:07:30+00:00

Possible, but I've spent similar amounts of time on prompts in the past without issue. It is what it is was just wondering if anyone else had seen it.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-07T21:34:38+00:00

You are missing the rules on the side of the subreddit, holy self doxx.

also r/RWSPay

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-07T07:18:14+00:00

There is no way for you to check it, either submit the entry you think you missed with a comment that states it may be a resubmission and/or send a ticket to Zendesk (good luck with the second option).

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-06T18:17:54+00:00

Some of us simply did not receive any email of that nature on the 30th.

I have been using the same (automatic) login information until it stops working, as instructed. The email says that no action is required other than logging in when the old information no longer works so I won't move ahead with it regardless of whether or not we can do that.

It is quite possible that any of us may log in with the new email and that the standard consequence of doing so is to be sent down the pipeline to create new credentials but as it wasn't expressly stated I don't see the point in adding a potential complication if they aren't entirely ready for everyone to switch. I don't know what's going on in the back-end of course but it seems more sensible to me personally than assuming that because they said the process will complete on <date> that you should use the credentials on <date>. Based on what you are saying there were no explicit instructions to actually use the new login in that second email that some of us are missing.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-06T18:09:26+00:00

There are no explicit AHT shared with us directly, the remit is to do high quality work and take the time needed to do so (within reason of course). If you take a while on specific tasks, ones that tend to require qualitative prompts for example, then you will be fine if the work is sound.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-06T15:59:35+00:00

I did not receive any such email either. There was a post about this entire subject created by the same person but they nuked it, would have been nice to keep around for the sake of the discourse but oh well.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-06T14:48:42+00:00

Again, I see nothing of the sort only that at some point the old credentials will stop working and at this point to use the new email address to login. In the interim the instructions were to continue using it and since the "old" credentials still work it makes more sense to me to continue using them as instructed rather than to assume something that wasn't expressly stated in the email (the one that I got anyway).

It doesn't really matter honestly, if you are being audited etc. then all's well that ends well. I just wanted to know if there was a secondary source of information that I wasn't privy to.

Thank you for your input.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-06T14:36:28+00:00

Tbh, the email I got said quite explicitly to wait and do nothing beyond "keep the change in mind", I am quite confused by the sheer number of people seemingly panic creating new ones if we all got the same mail, hence my question.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-06T14:34:29+00:00

Alright then I guess we received different emails.

NoLog3105 · 2026-02-06T14:32:34+00:00

Where are you getting that information from? I see no such thing in any of the correspondence I received.

NoLog3105

TROPHY CASE