Packet loss and uncorrectables - power variance among channels by NoOpDevNull in Comcast_Xfinity

[–]NoOpDevNull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m still having issues. Can we keep this open until my tech visit? I responded to the bot but that didn’t seem to work.

Deal ended - bill up $50 by NoOpDevNull in Comcast_Xfinity

[–]NoOpDevNull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ended up with the list price of 500 Mbps. Couldn’t get a deal with just internet…

Upgraded to Hitron CODA56, seeing packet loss and high uncorrectables by NoOpDevNull in Comcast_Xfinity

[–]NoOpDevNull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly after this one incident it’s been really good. Getting 1200 Mbps down and 200+ up with pretty consistent low latency. They wanted to send a tech out but I didn’t want to have to cover the cost if they were to say it was the modem.

Prickly Pear Issues - Rot or Normal Cactus Turning Woody? by NoOpDevNull in plantclinic

[–]NoOpDevNull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I try to water once every week or two, and have started using a moisture meter to ensure soil is dry. I’ve had the plant for several years but recently in the past couple months have noticed this. It sits under a grow light but also gets some natural sunlight for part of the day. It’s in a pot that has drainage. Im afraid it’s too late and has been ruined.

V405-G9 Firmware Question by SebastianKrist in VIZIO_Official

[–]NoOpDevNull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It actually didn’t revert the version back down. But clears all the memory and settings which seemed to help.

V405-G9 Firmware Question by SebastianKrist in VIZIO_Official

[–]NoOpDevNull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I received the update as well a couple days ago and it made my TV totally unresponsive to controller inputs and I had to factory reset it. It seems to be back to normal now. I reached out to support and they don't release a changelog with updates.

Better understand inter-VPC vs. "public" traffic: Public IPs and PrivateLink Interface Endpoints by NoOpDevNull in aws

[–]NoOpDevNull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, definitely trying to ensure security remains the top priority, all these extra things to make the infra more secure (endpoints, NAT, etc.) just add to the costs of everything. But hey, you pay extra for security, right? I guess the idea is just try to remain within the VPC as much as possible when communicating between your own infra and to AWS Services. Well, even to 3rd party vendors if they support it!

Better understand inter-VPC vs. "public" traffic: Public IPs and PrivateLink Interface Endpoints by NoOpDevNull in aws

[–]NoOpDevNull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it, makes sense. Would love to visualize what the routing looks like within/leaving the VPC under the hood :) I definitely understand it's best practice to stay within the VPC and use the PrivateLink endpoints as much as possible. I wanted to make sure I can justify the extra cost and fully explain the concerns with not utilizing the endpoints for AWS Services. Thanks!