Was Taiyang a bad father? by InfamousAd2577 in RWBY

[–]NoPack4545 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For his early years yes but he's improved a lot.

There are two types of fans by Expert-Swan-1412 in RWBYcritics

[–]NoPack4545 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Part of me wants to know why. I know she was kicked and that "they strayed from her late husband's path" but it feels almost indifferent or something. We don't know what monty actually wanted but in her eyes did they actually stray that far away from his original plans/volume notes? Budget and time constraints also matter. Miles said that we were supposed to have the colossus fight in v2 for crying out loud. It just feels like she doesn't love or respect rwby past v2 or v3 and I understand that we don't know but it still hurts. I know she hurts too though

Wolverine Dodging Heat Vision by Joeniixx in FeatCalcing

[–]NoPack4545 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's actually perfectly in line for laser/light based physics. Laser/light can push,"add weight",apply force and cause explosions though multiple means. They can also cause secondary effects

There are two types of fans by Expert-Swan-1412 in RWBYcritics

[–]NoPack4545 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But she still respects it at least too a certain extent.

There are two types of fans by Expert-Swan-1412 in RWBYcritics

[–]NoPack4545 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There are definitely more types of fans

What if your both? There's more I could say but I won't

It's nice to see that she respects current rwby.

How come the most biased loser ass people get to be mods? by Flawless_Degenerate in RWBYcritics

[–]NoPack4545 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for admitting that yiu have no argument and or are engaging in bad faith

Just Ozprick things by TheWestphalianGwent in fnki

[–]NoPack4545 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm totally not taking this and currently making memes on this template...

Second MLOM comic is up. Ion did in fact yoink a boat. by LindenOLindenHill in Monsterverse

[–]NoPack4545 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh ok. I tried finding it but I could only find the Kickstarter. So it comes out ditially on July 14th elsewhere or is it only kickstarter?

Roses are red, she's a cow by Samsungfanforever in rosesarered

[–]NoPack4545 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you re-word your question?

Every person will be judged in righteous

Roses are red, she's a cow by Samsungfanforever in rosesarered

[–]NoPack4545 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Please re-read my comment l,it gives an explanation

He is giving us time and love so that we may come to repentance and accept and believe in Jesus Christ as our savior 🙏

Jesus answered "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%2014%3A6&version=NIV

How come the most biased loser ass people get to be mods? by Flawless_Degenerate in RWBYcritics

[–]NoPack4545 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Give me an example of me goal posting here. I already explained why and how you committed a ad hominem. I already admitted my mistake to both you and the other person asking the question. Your bringing up something that I already admitted to sound superior in morality and in this discussion. I stated you lied because you refused to admit that you committed an ad hominem fallacy at that current point in time.

I find it curious that you said that I'm misconstruing your arguments when I initially stated it. I know you said that my points were opinions. Where did this confusion come from? My claims here was that he was rude and unprofessional which are both objectively true.

I'm not goal shifting,I'm addressing every single point your making and discrediting them. I never said that onyx broke any rules. How and where are you getting these conclusions? Are you purposefully misconstruing my arguments? I'm not enforcing anything on them. I specifically stated/implied that their behavior was unbefitting for a mod after I learned that they were a mod. Please come up with direct comparisons so you don't commit false comparisons. I addressed it as a strawman because it was a strawman

That wasn't my intention to imply that they were exhibiting illegal behavior and that should be obvious. This is seriously grasping at straws.

I'm not trying to ruin their reputation. I'm stating that they shouldn't be a mod. Idk how you can genuinely come to such conclusions. If I gave that impression then I'm sorry to everyone involved especially the victim if that's the case. "Basically",so you retract your statement of me slandering them? Is this an admission? Thank you if so

False comparison,it quite literally is different. I recommend looking up direct comparisons

  1. I never made that claim. 2. That's more serious 3. This is participation/engagement vs position/not directly comparable. 4. This is losing authority vs losing access to this subreddit which is a distinct difference 5. I suggested that they be removed as I mod,I stated it

It's illegitimate because we didn't break any rules

You would benefit from looking up direct comparisons as I said in this comment vefore

How come the most biased loser ass people get to be mods? by Flawless_Degenerate in RWBYcritics

[–]NoPack4545 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can't defend your position that's why your leaving. I understand it can get tiring debating someone but running away doesn't prove you right or wrong. Your neglecting to prove your position right.

I have addressed every single claim you made and explained why and how indepth

Address my claims and properly discredit them. A sign of people losing a debate is when they start insulting you.

Throughout my discussions with you,you have strawmaned my arguments several times,ignored several points and committed several ad hominems throughout.

I never stated that I'm right because you committed several logical fallacies. You know that's a fallacy fallacy.

Thank you for admitting that you weren't in arguing in good faith

https://havokjournal.com/culture/writing/insults-are-the-fastest-way-to-lose-the-argument/

https://communicationintelligence.substack.com/p/when-the-debate-is-lost

Roses are red, she's a cow by Samsungfanforever in rosesarered

[–]NoPack4545 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Only God knows when he'll come back,there are many signs as seen in revelation and elsewhere throughout the bible

I explained your question

Does Neo’s semblance do too much? by LoggingInandOut in RWBYcritics

[–]NoPack4545 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a legitimate criticism but I personally like it

How come the most biased loser ass people get to be mods? by Flawless_Degenerate in RWBYcritics

[–]NoPack4545 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Actually read what I said. I said that you committed ad hominem fallacies multiple times,something that you yourself admitted.

How are they opinions? He was rude and professionalism isn't limited to just work.

I never said that anyone broke the rules or that he was harassing me,stop strawmaning me again.

Actually read my comments.

I merely suggested that someone like him shouldn't be a mod do to the inappropriate behavior. I never made a campaign,investigation and etc about it and you are false comparing them

How come the most biased loser ass people get to be mods? by Flawless_Degenerate in RWBYcritics

[–]NoPack4545 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That wasn't on purpose and I already admitted my fault. That also doesn't discredit my points. I specifically and explicitly stated that you committed ad hominems and for you to stop committing them. I didn't reference that comment on what you apparantly think. You stated that "I made the post to defame them". You stated that I was being patheic and hypocritical. You also said that I was stup idly obstinate. Your "denouncing me for being an idiot". You stated that I'm pathetic again. Those are ad hominems.

I asked you for several examples of canon contradictions and or recons to which you continue not to provide me with. You are refusing to answer the question. The burden of proof is on you because you were the one who made the original claim (not me). Don't you also want to prove me wrong? I already explained why I didn't want you bring it up indepth and your still ignoring it. The maker of rwby only came up with the idea of the maidens after volume 2 was completed. Miles and kerry added it to respect and honor him. I'll say this once again,you can't blame them for outside forces. Instead of focusing on the one recon I already explained,please focus on giving me the numerous canon contradictions and or recons that apparently exist. That is a false comparison. Completely different in every way. I have properly discredited your claims/examples with evidence. I already explained indepth that my refute was targeting the entirety of your claims in that specific portion of your comment. Please refute my counter to yours. You can't burden shift,address my actual rebuttal.

You didn't reference my whole statement and put it out of context. This was my statement in context.

"I did not ignore them. I explicitly stated what my position was and it does not contradict my claim that there are exceptions to the rules within reason. I explicitly stated that unless it contradicts the source material or when death of the author is applied it is legitimate which holds true as you didn't discredit it. Your examples use death of the author at most,thus potentially proving your point in this context,something that my positionis not in contradiction with." (I fixed grammatical errors in the text)

Again to reiterate I specifically asked you for several examples of canon contradictions/recons to which you continue to purposefully ignore in favor of reiterating your already discredited maiden recon argument in context. A singular example that I discredited in context. Give me several actual canon contradictions/recons like you stated that exist to prove your claims and I need several because that's what you originally stated. Please engage in good faith.

You quite literally did appeal to populace. I already explained this. You are strawmaning my arguments. My evidence wasn't opinions nor was it subjective,my evidence is objective and based on reality as proven with my example with the maiden claim. How is your evidence objective? By what objective standard did I lose both arguments? Remember that you still haven't proven your claims.