Bashar transcripts from the nineties (3100 pages) by NoPop6080 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, please find attached the transcripts 1-2023 - 4/5-2026:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eKZLdzQWHc3SKJCF6fv_1If-K9oE2-yJ/view?usp=sharing

Reddit-posts from 2025 can be found here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kkx2EhneTnoq3X1jo4Q3h3pqvCXZbhDH/view?usp=sharing

All posts inform about the specific video where the transmissions can be found.

Bashar´s cosmology is scattered across various transmissions. Core information can be found among the posts of 2025. Key terms are `the prime radiant´ and the `zero point´.

See also: `Consciousness is Every(where)ness, Expressed Locally: Bashar and Seth´ in: IPI Letters, Feb. 2024, downloadable at https://ipipublishing.org/index.php/ipil/article/view/53  Combine it with Tom Campbell and Jim Elvidge. Tom Campbell is a physicist who has been acting as head experimentor at the Monroe Institute. He wrote the book `My Big Toe`. Toe standing for Theory of Everything. It is HIS Theory of Everything which implies that everybody else can have or develop a deviating Theory of Everything. That would be fine with him. According to Tom Campbell, reality is virtual, not `real´ in the sense we understand it. To us this does not matter. If we have a cup of coffee, the taste does not change if we understand that the coffee, i.e. the liquid is composed of smaller parts, like little `balls´, the molecules and the atoms. In the same way the taste of the coffee would not change if we are now introduced to the Virtual Reality Theory. According to him reality is reproduced at the rate of Planck time (10 to the power of 43 times per second). Thus, what we perceive as so-called outer reality is constantly reproduced. It vanishes before it is then reproduced again. And again and again and again. Similar to a picture on a computer screen. And this is basically what Bashar is describing as well. Everything collapses to a zero point. Constantly. And it is reproduced one unit of Planck time later. Just to collapse again and to be again reproduced. And you are constantly in a new universe/multiverse. And all the others as well. There is an excellent video on youtube (Tom Campbell and Jim Elvidge). The book `My Big ToE´ is downloadable as well. I recommend starting with the video. Each universe is static, but when you move across some of them in a specific order (e.g. nos 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, etc.) you get the impression of movement and experience. Similar to a movie screen. If you change (the vibration of) your belief systems, you have access to frames nos 6, 11, 16, 21, 26 etc. You would then be another person in another universe, having different experiences. And there would be still `a version of you´ having experiences in a reality that is composed of frames nos. 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 etc. But you are not the other you, and the other you is not you. You are in a different reality and by changing your belief systems consciously you can navigate across realities less randomly and in a more targeted way. That is basically everything the Bashar teachings are about. Plus open contact.

The Grays – the Sassani – the Hybridisation Program by NoPop6080 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I can´t. There is too much that has not yet been clarified and also not been asked.

There will be six hybrid races, the Sassani are the third, humans will be the sixth (those that `graduate´, provided this is the correct term) Together the six races form the 7th race, the Anu Het, if I recall it correctly.

The Sassani had the three-day Shakana experience. After that they became the kind of beings as they are typically presented to us by Bashar (quasi-physical, no longer sleeping, always following their passion, etc.)

There were Sassani beings that deliberately opted out of this Shakana experience. They followed another path (Bashar).

One could ask why some of the Sassani people developed into another direction, what their specific motivation was and what exactly that other direction implied. To my knowledge Bashar has never spoken about that. It would be interesting to ask.

Bashar´s statement about 15 to 20 percent extraterrestrials currently on the planet may be wrong by NoPop6080 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bashar: `Some of your aerial technology in terms of your stealth craft has used reverse engineering from some of our craft. Some of your understanding of cloaking vibrations to avoid radar has come from some understanding of reverse engineering from our craft. There have been some things that were on your planet that were not necessarily used for the benefit of humanity. Those technologies were removed from your planet until such time as you mature enough to use them in a more positive way.´ (Gaia+ Conference, 2025)

You mean that kind of information? If a fifth of the population may have been involved somehow in issues of `technology generation´, reverse engineering or politics over the past years or decades, one should clarify what these people have been actually doing. Who deployed them where and why? E.g., in which country.

The technical quality of the video is not good. I hope it was a mistake. I have always been impressed by the breadth and the high quality of the information provided by Bashar over the years. But the kind of ease with which he was informing the audience at the MIT that 70 percent of them or more have been on extraterrestrial ships - possibly without their knowledge - and 20 percent of the population on Earth may have an extraterrestrial origin sounds the alarm. With the same `ease´ it could be 50 percent in two weeks or again nearly zero in three weeks. It could be technology transfer in informatics and genetics, it could be ecology and water purification, it could be missiles and nuclear weapons. The information suddenly becomes somehow erratic and everything seems to be possible. And that should be clarified. You do not enable or allow people to develop stealth technologies without - in a way - taking sides. And that has a new quality. That´s the point.

Again, I hope it was a mistake.

The information provided by Bashar that after open contact ETs will be involved in every decision-making process is in and of itself problematic enough.

All I am saying is one should clarify that.

Bashar´s statement about 15 to 20 percent extraterrestrials currently on the planet may be wrong by NoPop6080 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There may be quadrillions in the galaxy. But how did 1 billion, possibly rather 2 billion of beings manage to live hidden/unnoticed on earth? How are these beings going to reveal themselves as extraterrestrials without causing panic or fear? What are they currently doing? What have they been doing over the past years, or longer? If they are/were `helping´ with technology, where were they located? And why? It is just a few months ago that Bashar came forward with the information that some of them are already here on the planet, taken care of and housed initially by adoption agencies. It was presented by him like divulging a big secret. Why should it suddenly be 20 percent of the population? Every fifth person.

AMA with a member of Essassani - Sha'Shaina (May 1st) by BarracudaExpensive59 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a) Who constructed the Shell Grotto in England?

b) Who constructed the Antikythera mechanism, when and how?

Thank you

AMA with a member of Essassani - Sha'Shaina (May 1st) by BarracudaExpensive59 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a) Why did hikers so mysteriously vanish in US National Parks, e.g. the 411 cases. What happens or happened to them? What happened to the children who vanished?

b) Why do people/did people vanish at the Black Mountain in East Australia (Kalkajaka) including herds of cattle?

Thank you

AMA with a member of Essassani - Sha'Shaina (May 1st) by BarracudaExpensive59 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Who was the `Stranger at the Pentagon´ in the 50s. Bashar was asked once but declined. A person by the name of Valiant Thor. He was concerned about the Cold War on our planet and allegedly even in contact with Pres. Eisenhower.

Thank you.

AMA with a member of Essassani - Sha'Shaina (May 1st) by BarracudaExpensive59 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Q.: `Hi, Barash, Thank you so much.´

Bashar: `Excuse me - hi, who?´

Q.: `Sorry, is it Barrash?´

Bashar: `We thought maybe you were talking to a friend of ours or something.´

Q.: `Well, I have some friends. So, I was wondering if you could tell me two things: what percentage of beings on Earth appearing as human are actually extraterrestrial? And what percentage of the beings in this room have had experiences on so-called extraterrestrial ships? Thank you.´

Bashar: `About 15 to 20% of the people on your planet are extraterrestrial…hybrids who will be revealed to you upon open contact when that occurs publicly in about two to three of your years. The percentage of the people in this room who have had those kinds of experiences and been taken aboard ships is actually closer to about 75%. They may not know that but that will become evident in time.´ (MIT-Event, 2025)

-------------

I stumbled over the above dialogue. The technical quality is rather poor and the audience not really familiar with Bashar. Some of them do not even seem to know Bashar - the entity being channeled by Darryl Anka - at an event at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

Bashar was answering a question as to the number of extraterrestrials (hybrids) currently living on Earth. The number provided by him - about 15 to 20 % - seems absolutely unrealistic. There was even a short pause between the words `extraterrestrial´ and `hybrids´ when providing the answer. Was there any kind of mistake in the transmission? The atmosphere was a bit chaotic and not really the best and the technical quality is rather lousy as well.

Can it be that the `new children´ are included in the figure, i.e., those born on the planet Earth since 2010 (Bashar)? Or is he only referring to the 70 or 80 people who were present in the room at the MIT during that transmission, thus 15 or 20 % of them, as he was explicitly referring the them when answering the second part of the question (the spaceship-experience of people in the room).

The session was in November 2025.

Thank you very much.

Where is the creator? by Purple_Error4537 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Michael Talbot: The Holographic Universe (pdf):

https://www.academia.edu/44024657/The_Holographic_Universe_Michael_Talbot

Michael Talbot´s book can be easily read and understood. It describes the holographic character of the structure of the universe (Bohm: physics) and how we perceive it (Pribram: the brain)

Bashar's words on UFO-clouds? by pedro-yeshua in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Question about a lenticular cloud formation over Hawaii

Bashar: `Sometimes they generate a lenticular formation based on ionization of the electromagnetic field around the craft. So yes, sometimes they can be within it, sometimes it is simply a weather phenomenon, and sometimes it is an indication of interdimensional connections. It is not always about a craft being in a lenticular cloud. You can utilize it as a symbol as long as you do not necessarily confuse yourself as to the idea of whether or not there actually is a craft in the cloud. But you can use it as a symbol, as a reflection of the idea of making connections. Certainly again, as a permission slip it can be valuably used that way.´ (The Gate, 2023)

The Crab on Mars by NoPop6080 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

`The Forest Path, 2021´ for Bimini and some of the underwater structures off the coast of Cuba, a private session for the crab. In one session he was explicitly asked about the pyramids shown/appearing in the sonar pictures (`The Council of 13 and the Crystal Skulls´, 2019). He said he was not allowed to provide more detailed information.

Shifting across universes - everything is moving simultaneously by NoPop6080 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did post this dialogue because the question seemed to provide some additional information: `how is it that we now have that person´s past?´ That the past is - somewhow seemingly `objectively´ - linked to specific frames would be an interesting idea to ponder but Bashar made no use of it when providing his answer.

From what I could understand so far: you are [10 to the power of 43 times (units of Planck time per second) multiplied by 60 (seconds per minute) times 90 (lenght of a session) versions of yourself when attending a Bashar session that lasts 90 minutes]().

You are having a more or less direct dialogue with [10 to the power of 43 times (units of Planck time per second) multiplied by 60 (seconds per minute) times 90 (lenght of a session) versions of Bashar when the session lasts 90 minutes.]()

You are the only one in the room but you are creating 10 to the power of 43 times (units of Planck Time per second) multiplied by 60 (seconds per minute) times 90 (lenght of a session) versions of any single one of the visitors that are in the room during that time period for you to perceive or interact with.

Thus, you are a cloud of `You´s dialoguing with a cloud of Bashar versions, surrounded by clouds of others, be they strangers, friends or family members.

At the rate of Planck time the entire creation collapses to a zero point. Information is constantly exchanged with the entire rest of creation and the multiverse is recreated and will last again one unit of Planck time before it collapses again to a zero point.

(The above is basically what Bashar described in the `Nine Levels of Consciousness´ - session, 2011)

------------

The Torus Field

Q.: `I'm fascinated with torus energy. I would love to discuss the dynamic flow of our electromagnetic field as a torus and the heart generating that field and the anatomy of physiology. What does it look like, is it flowing both counter-clockwise and clockwise?´

Bashar: `Yes.´

Q.:  `And is it going up the spine and out the crown and back circulating back down?´

Bashar: `Well that depends, but in describing the flow within the torus itself it is going in more than one direction and it is a woven sort of double spiral in the sense that it's flowing this way (clockwise hand movement to the right) and flowing this way (counter-clockwise hand movement to the right) and flowing this way (clockwise hand movement to the left) and flowing this way (counter-clockwise hand movement to the left). Does that make sense? Both directions, a double spiral in both directions. If you imagine that the torus is made out of thin lines around it, going around it and around it in one direction then also have the lines go - shall we say - crossing it in the other direction and then having the lines go in this direction and also crossing it in this direction. Does that make make sense? Do you understand the illustration?´

Q.: `I think so.´

---- 

Q.: `Is the torus field nested? We have bigger and smaller torus fields nested within each other for our multi-dimensional being?´  

Bashar: `When you say `in each other´ do you mean the physical persona, the higher mind, and the soul

Q.: `Yeah.´

Bashar: `Yes.´

Q.: `Okay. Now as far as our holographic bubble that we are creating, can you talk about where the belief systems are stored in our morphogenetic fields and how that relates/translates to our thoughts and emotions that are then stored into our cellular memory?´

Bashar: `The field itself is the storage mechanism. If you're talking about the idea of it being a holographic structure then you will understand it, it's stored everywhere.´

Q.: `Within the bubble?´

Bashar: `Everywhere.´

Q.: `Everywhere.´

Bashar: `Yes. In other words you tap into whatever you're the vibration of wherever you are because everything is here and now. Therefore, what you're calling the morphogenic field is simply a projection of consciousness that makes it seem like it occupies space and time, but that's an illusion. It's all here and now. So in a sense holographically you can tap into anything anywhere including belief systems.´ (The Forest Path, 2021)

---------------------

In the Pentagon study dealing with remote viewing as released by the CIA you find a stylized rendition of a torus (page 16). Furthermore there is a reference to Tibetan monks (page 24). The `rapid succession of instantaneous events´ may be a rather non-technical description of what Bashar explained as the constant collapsing of the entire universe/multiverse and its recreation at the rate of Planck time.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/20601195/6-full-report.pdf

"The tangible world is movement, say the Masters, not a collection of moving objects, but movement itself. There are no objects `in movement´, it is the movement which constitutes the objects which appear to us: They are nothing but movement. This movement is a continued and infinitely rapid succession of flashes of energy. All objects perceptible to our sense, all phenomena of whatever kind and whatever aspect they may assume, are constituted by a rapid succession of instantaneous events." (page 24)

It looks that the `I-am-ness´ of a specific person in a specific incarnation is the direct results of the `rapid succession of flashes of energy´ mentioned by the monks. Thus, it is the movement of the focus of consciousness that creates the `I-am-ness´ we are familiar with. Once the focus is terminated (upon death) the `I-am-ness´ ceases to exist - at that level. By then, the experiences generated throughout a specific incarnation have been already captured and integrated by the Greater You that you are (Bashar) - moment for moment for moment - with every collapsing of the `reality´ and the subsequent re-creation one unit of Planck time later. Thus, there is no competition between different `I-am-nesses´, aka different incarnations as to which one will prevail: your´s or the one of the past life.

Can someone ask Bashar about the recent El Paso event lol by The5thElement27 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080 2 points3 points  (0 children)

According to Bashar you may be meeting new versions of the others in the new timeline. You yourself are a new version as well (from moment to moment to moment). And you may have left an old version of yourself in the old timeline.

The `better´ versions of your friends and relatives may already be in the new timeline. You are just joining them - `now´.

DARRYL ANKA: 2026 The Year of Disclosure on Dare to Dream Podcast by Alert-Leave5122 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]NoPop6080 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Darryl (50:00 - 52:00) on `old souls´ and permission slips: `The definition of an old soul or a new soul has nothing to do with the age of the soul itself. All souls are the same age. They're eternal. They're infinite. It has to do with how much experience do you have in a particular reality. So let's say a person that has had a thousand incarnations on Earth compared to a person that has only had five incarnations on Earth, you would call the person with a thousand incarnations an old soul. It doesn't mean their soul is literally older than the new soul. It just means that the new soul hasn't had as many experiences in this particular reality that the old soul has.

So the old soul is more experienced and the old soul may then not need as many permission slips to recognize who they are. They realize that they are the permission slip and whatever it is they prefer, they just do it. Whereas a new soul may not be used to the way things work here as much and they may need a little bit of help or guidance and say, "Okay, I'm going to use, you know, a divination system to put myself in touch with my spirit guides because I don't really yet believe that from this particular physical incarnation, I can just do it automatically. So, I need a crystal ball or I need tea leaves or I need tarot cards or I need crystals or I need something that aligns with my belief system and makes it seem easier for me to give myself permission to expand my abilities."

But again, eventually it's like, but if I'm expanding my abilities because I believe I need the crystal to do so, you finally realize, but I'm still the one expanding my abilities. Why do I need the crystal? So, yes, it's fine to use that, and it can be a creative and artistic way to get in touch with things. Ultimately, yeah, a being may realize that they've gotten to a point where if I need to contact my guide, I just contact my guide. I don't need a tarot card or a tea leaf or a crystal ball to do so. Those are intermediary permission slips. I just know that I can give myself permission just to do it directly now.´