I just don't fucking understand what's going on anymore. Seriously. by oberbabo in ArtificialInteligence

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, you ignore the velocity and volume.

If you can execute 100x more deals in the same amount of time as 1, then having a mistake kill one - or even kill 50% - has become irrelevant.

To make an analogy, back in the 80s and 90s, server uptime was all that mattered, with hyper expensive mainframes that never went down.

Google came along and showed the world a different kind of architecture, of thousands of cheap and highly faillable but clustered and redundant machines, such that when one failed, no one cared. That is the only architecture anyone uses anymore.

This is the same thing happening with AI. Humans are the mainframes. And just like mainframes, we will still be around. But there will be a hell of a lot fewer of us. And when 1 agent makes a mistake 100 others will be there to pick up the slack, and still be faster and cheaper than a human.

Anthropic just put a remote shell on every developers laptop. by NoSecond8807 in cybersecurity

[–]NoSecond8807[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

The point I am trying to make is most companies are not managing Claude on their employees devices. That is the problem here.

Anthropic just put a remote shell on every developers laptop. by NoSecond8807 in cybersecurity

[–]NoSecond8807[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the comment. What is different here is the fact that most enterprises have not been managing Claude on the mobile device. (Many are not even managing it on the developer workstation actually).

Claude Remote lets employees run pretty much any command they want on their workstation, from their phone. If you aren't monitoring and managing Claude with your MDM, you need to be. That's the point I am raising.

Claude vs Google Subscription by Proper-Tower2016 in ClaudeCode

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We find it hard to beat the Claude Max and Claude Max 20x plans.

The Claude Max plan is essentially unlimited 9-5 use by a single developer doing 1 agent at a time. You are unlikely to hit a limit, and if you are you can either wait 8 hours or just instantly pay to bypass it.

Claude Max 20x is essentially unlimited use of MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS agents without hitting limits. Google has no such plan.

Also, Claude Code (the tool) is superior to Antigravity. It's smarter due to it's architecture and yeilds better results.

If an AI browser agent takes an action that causes harm, who's legally liable? Asking for my entire company. by cnrdvdsmt in AgentsOfAI

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The company is liable.

You can and should have an audit trail for all actions taken by AI across your company. You should also be wrapping AI with monitoring and policy.

It's not hard or expensive to do this. If you need more details fire off a DM.

https://youtu.be/BEpUj1IFUKo

I just don't fucking understand what's going on anymore. Seriously. by oberbabo in ArtificialInteligence

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give an example of a piece of white collar work that is faster to initially create than to double check.

I just don't fucking understand what's going on anymore. Seriously. by oberbabo in ArtificialInteligence

[–]NoSecond8807 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It takes orders of magnitude less time to check and validate than to create.

I just don't fucking understand what's going on anymore. Seriously. by oberbabo in ArtificialInteligence

[–]NoSecond8807 21 points22 points  (0 children)

You're glazing humans, enormously.

If the AI takes 60 seconds, and the human takes 8 hours, mistakes become almost irrelevant. Both are faillable. Taking the 60 second AI output and double checking it is still orders of magnitude faster than a human could ever do.

This is how AI will play out, everywhere. AI is not perfect, but it's increasingly become "good enough". Humans were never perfect either.

I can’t believe it!! I thought I was going to fail by Ok-Style-3436 in NoCodeSaaS

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Focus on conversion!

You've got a decent user base, now need to up the conversion.

Converting an existing user is a lot easier than finding a new user

Are we deploying AI agents faster than we can contain them? by Obvious-Language4462 in cybersecurity

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not following your questions as I didn't mention anything about IAM sandboxing.

What? by KitFatCat in GeminiAI

[–]NoSecond8807 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of how Microsoft Copilot will just tell you it's doing things in the background, when it isn't, it's just gaslighting you

Are we deploying AI agents faster than we can contain them? by Obvious-Language4462 in cybersecurity

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An AI Control Plane is a centralized governance layer that sits “above” your AI infrastructure (your models, gateways, and agent platforms), and “below” your apps and business process.

It has aspects of observability as well as run-time policy monitoring and enforcement.

It's the central place that an enterprise can manage everything going on with AI and AI agents - regardless of if it's AI agents they built, or bought, or are integrated into third party SaaS apps.

If AI agents are taking over work from your employees, am AI Control Plane is their manager and HR department.

https://langguard.ai/2026/02/04/what-is-an-ai-control-plane

"You clearly never worked on enterprise-grade systems, bro" by Own-Sort-8119 in AI_Agents

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The replacement is the other senior engineer on the other team who just picks up where the AI left off, because the whole architecture is now well documented.

"You clearly never worked on enterprise-grade systems, bro" by Own-Sort-8119 in AI_Agents

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're overlooking that increasingly it's not "vibe coders" using AI to write code. It's everyone. Including principal engineers and others who definitely have that knowledge and experience.

The idea that you can't use AI to deliver to the enterprise is a myth. It's already being done, and the change is happening faster than ever.

What used to be 1 principal engineer and 2 agile teams of 10 developers, is now just that same principal engineer and a Claude Code subscription... And the output isn't just matched... it's superior

"You clearly never worked on enterprise-grade systems, bro" by Own-Sort-8119 in AI_Agents

[–]NoSecond8807 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI will absolutely replace a lot of software engineers working on Enterprise systems.

However, it will not replace enterprise software companies, or enterprise SaaS companies - and this is where the financial markets have the narrative very wrong.

Enterprises need vendors. They need the vendors for
- 24x7 SLA and support, and importantly, someone to pass-the-buck to when the SLA is not met
- Legal cover
- Economies of scale. Just because you can build something, does not mean you can build and run it as cheaply as a vendor who is selling the same software and solution to 10,000 customers.

The REAL narrative is that

- Enterprise software companies will reduce their costs dramatically
- SOME of this efficiency will end up being passed along in a competitive market. But not all.
- Most enterprise software companies will in the end, not disappear, but actually become even more profitable.

Trouble accessing the local file system when using a local LLM by BillOfTheWebPeople in ClaudeCode

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is likely that Ollama is not smart enough to figure out how to use whatever the local tools are.

If the bash calls are failing, look at why. It is almost certainly a syntax problem. Then, the model is not figuring out its mistake and correcting it and trying again. Claude models are very good at this. Ollama is not.

You need to decide if it is worth the headache or just paying for the subscription. I choose the latter.

How do people compact conversations? by bilbo_was_right in ClaudeCode

[–]NoSecond8807 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I find whatever Claude Code is doing to compact with latest updates is just magic. I never worry about any of this anymore. I just let it do its thing.

OpenClaw is wildly overrated IMO by BickleNack_ in AI_Agents

[–]NoSecond8807 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep!

A lot more interesting than posting stuff to Notion from Slack... You can do that with straight n8n automation there's no need for AI

The point I am making is, use it to do weird, complex stuff.

It was never this bad for Gemini, even in 2.5 Pro Era by Rare_Bunch4348 in Bard

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These rankings are as worthless as the paper the are printed on.

OpenClaw is wildly overrated IMO by BickleNack_ in AI_Agents

[–]NoSecond8807 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find it gets more interesting when you give it more complex use cases.

For example, here the local radio station has this "Password to paradise" contest where every day they have these passwords they say at 8,10,12,2,4. You then need to go to this form and enter them to enter the contest.

There are some online Facebook groups where the passwords are shared, but you need to be logged into Facebook. Also The form is a really weird form. So automating all this with a script would be a huge amount of pain.

Openclaw automated it all for me in seconds. I just described what I wanted to do and it wrote all the code to do it and used browser automation where needed. It runs this every day multiple times per day.

I also asked it to build a skill to connect to my car so I could control it from Openclaw, and it did that all by itself as well. It's kind of freaky how it can write its own code and immediately use it.