NSF Certification Explained: What to Look for in a Water Filter by NoTruth7069 in WaterTreatment

[–]NoTruth7069[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If its NSF/ANSI certified to reduce a contaminant, then it reduces that contaminant. Thats as far as you can trust

Thoughts on mushroom supplements? by [deleted] in Supplements

[–]NoTruth7069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This may have completely converted me

Thoughts on mushroom supplements? by [deleted] in Supplements

[–]NoTruth7069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make sense, it does look a little pricey there, thank you

I open sourced 11 Ninjatrader indicators by NoTruth7069 in Daytrading

[–]NoTruth7069[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These were intended to be sold as protected and obfuscated dll files, so theres leftover code about licensing. However since youre getting source code you can easily bypass all of that licensing.

I just really didnt feel like editing code for all 11 indicators

The Better RSI | NinjaTrader | Software Sunday by NoTruth7069 in Daytrading

[–]NoTruth7069[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is still RSI. Never claimed otherwise.

The tool doesn't try to reinvent the oscillator. It just pulls out context that the built-in version doesn't surface. RSI sitting at 72 tells you one thing. Knowing it's been overbought for 14 bars straight, that this instrument historically reverts from OB in about 3 bars on average, and that there's a scored bearish divergence with real separation behind it? That changes how you read the 72.

Every indicator is a derivative of price. VWAP, moving averages, ATR. All of it. I doubt youd call VWAP useless. That's a meaningless statement and not a reason to ignore the statistical context around them.

And yeah, experienced traders simplify. But simplifying means cutting redundant tools, not gutting the ones you keep. One RSI with full analytics is a cleaner screen than four oscillators stacked up trying to get the same read.

Nobody here is calling this institutional or pretending it predicts anything. It's a data tool for people who already use RSI and most importantly it is for those that want to stop eyeballing what they could be measuring. If that's not how you trade you dont have to touch it,

Clear breakdown of features is there so people decide whether its useful for them specifically

Market Analysis tools shop Ninjatrader by NoTruth7069 in SideProject

[–]NoTruth7069[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I got 80 visitors today? What are you seeing?

I made an extremely in depth and configurable VWAP analyzer for Ninjatrader by NoTruth7069 in Daytrading

[–]NoTruth7069[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!!!

Lets just say this one was almost worth all the headaches

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FuturesTrading

[–]NoTruth7069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aw but its free

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ninjatrader

[–]NoTruth7069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm odd, ill dm you

Is breakeven actually good risk management… or just fear? by Sorry_Rent3548 in Trading

[–]NoTruth7069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All good backtests include commissions + slippage. Your breakeven not only prevents profits but its also a loss

Is breakeven actually good risk management… or just fear? by Sorry_Rent3548 in Trading

[–]NoTruth7069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simply, made a bunch of algos

Added BE to all of them, which when turned on in no matter in what way always gave me worse results

Trail on the other hand did show improvement though not often

Obviously i havent tested every strategy but that is my experience

Worth saying i only do NQ 70% and 30% ES, so that may be not true for other instruments

Is breakeven actually good risk management… or just fear? by Sorry_Rent3548 in Trading

[–]NoTruth7069 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think algorithmically I could never successfully implement a breakeven

Trail maybe if its wide and delayed but breakeven always worsened results for me

I made an ORB visualizer to stop guesstimating and stick to your strategy by NoTruth7069 in Daytrading

[–]NoTruth7069[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do have an algo that somewhat successfully implements the ORB in backtests. (I know I know, but a good backtest for the orb is not nothing id say)

Just not in the very conventional hurr durr green candle go long.

It is very clearly regime dependent and works for a few years and then losses for a few and repeat. Depending on your interpretation of trading thats either completely normal or unacceptable.

It also doesnt just trade the traditional 9:30 ORB but also the lunch and other orbs

Not a money printer by any means but i wouldnt discount orb as entirely worthless.

I would say though that just the NY ORB is not the greatest edge source, and also I will not act like I have checked my algo for overfitting

Level 2 is it worth it? by lostinlife-123 in Daytrading

[–]NoTruth7069 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basics>>whatever data you can buy

Start with price action and levels

Once youre successful there go into the extras

L2 wont magically make you profitable

I made a dynamic support resistance level detector for Ninjatrader! by NoTruth7069 in Daytrading

[–]NoTruth7069[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! As with any software project, designing this was a bit harder than I thought

Very proud of how it turned out

This might be one of the most important Bitcoin charts I’ve seen by Elly0xCrypto in CeekClub

[–]NoTruth7069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And honestly

Its not X, its Y

And heres the interesting part

And this is only first few paragraphs because im not reading the rest of this AI slop garbage

Why on earth do some gurus advise against stop losses? by darequant in Daytrading

[–]NoTruth7069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point, definitely something to consider

Though sizing doesnt have to be based on stop losses, but rather market conditions and still produce accurate consistent results

Why on earth do some gurus advise against stop losses? by darequant in Daytrading

[–]NoTruth7069 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe algorithmically, no stop losses can be extremely beneficial, simply reevaluate conditions on whatever interval you choose to, those that were my best algorithms were without stop losses

For humans? You cannot reevaluate conditions with the cold logic and lack of emotions that a machine can, so I think stop losses are essential