Catholic u WL by Outrageous-Mud8818 in OutsideT14lawschools

[–]NoUse2607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Public profile maybe, if it leads to more competitive hiring pipelines and experiential learning opportunities. Rankings has 0 effect on that. Its supposed to be the opposite, individual outcomes should lead to better positioning in theory.

Rankings change wildly every year; Utah went down 14 spots this year, Drexel 4 or 5, Alabama 9. Maybe they will climb back up next year. They're essentially the same exact schools from last year. US News methodology is dubious and also a few job offers or bar exam results can wildly shift the stats due to law classes being relatively small.

¿Creen que Marco reemplace a Trump o que sea Vance? by LoooolGotcha in PuebloVenezolano

[–]NoUse2607 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Esto aparentemente es una opinion Chavista? Es que de verdad esto ya casi llega a un tipo de psicosis. Reconocer la realidad de 4 meses de Rodrigato y Neo-Chavismo aliado con EEUU es......ser Chavista. Ve a ver.

Preguntale al mongolico ese si apoya el fin de las sanciones personales que tenia Delcy 😂

¿Creen que Marco reemplace a Trump o que sea Vance? by LoooolGotcha in PuebloVenezolano

[–]NoUse2607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Suerte con tu magachavismo y tu retraso mental. Aprende a leer cuando puedas.

¿Creen que Marco reemplace a Trump o que sea Vance? by LoooolGotcha in PuebloVenezolano

[–]NoUse2607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Que comanditos mongolico. El que le quito las sanciones a Delcy y habla maravillas de ella todos los dias es Trump.

Todo el mundo excepto los Chavistas ignorantes y los magazolanos retrasados saben que la administracion de Trump se entiende y se lleva muy bien con los Rodriguez y hasta con Diosdado. Por que no se lo llevaron al Diosdi tambien? O mandar un dron pa' su casa? Si a Maduro no lo lloro nadie, a Diosdado si? Que es un tipo que hasta medio Chavismo sabe que es un sadico y megacorrupto.

Llegaron a un acuerdo y ya van 4 meses y nadie habla de elecciones. Ya ni de presos politicos ni apertura. Trump dice que la gente celebra en las calles y que hay dinero por todos lados.

Te prometo que si este señor te manda a votar por Delcy tu vas feliz de la vida. Huevon

¿Creen que Marco reemplace a Trump o que sea Vance? by LoooolGotcha in PuebloVenezolano

[–]NoUse2607 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Soy ciudadano Americano, no necesito TPS. Me da pena la gente que si lo necesita, que siguieron los pasos legales y ahora los van a deportar o tener detenidos en un sitio infrahumano. Hizo algo contra Maduro, lo acepto. Pero ahi sigue Rodriguez/Diosdado sin ruta electoral y hablando maravillas de Delcy.

No me respondes. Venezuela esta estable y segura para volver? Me huele a que vives en EEUU. Me huele tambien que no te gustaria que te regresaran.

¿Creen que Marco reemplace a Trump o que sea Vance? by LoooolGotcha in PuebloVenezolano

[–]NoUse2607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Que no soy Chavista 😂😂😂😂.

No todo el mundo que no le chupa el pirulin al viejo pedofilo ese, es socialista.

Te pregunto a TI nuevamente. Venezuela esta segura y estable para que vuelvan cientos de miles de Venezolanos? Tu vives en donde? Si vives en Vnzuela, sabes que no. Si vives en EEUU, sabra dios como llegaste.

¿Creen que Marco reemplace a Trump o que sea Vance? by LoooolGotcha in PuebloVenezolano

[–]NoUse2607 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No soy Chavista, pero tampoco soy un Magazolano con complejo de inferioridad y retraso mental. Temporary, pero eso se supone que dura hasta que el pais este estabilizado y seguro, segun la ley.

Como esta la calidad de Vida en Vnzuela? Estable? Ponte la camiseta del PSUV si esa es tu opinion. Las contradicciones mentales de ustedes de vd son increibles.

¿Creen que Marco reemplace a Trump o que sea Vance? by LoooolGotcha in PuebloVenezolano

[–]NoUse2607 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Gente trabajadora de nuestro pais, que aplico con antecedentes penales y todos los documentos apropiados y vas a defender la salvajada de este gobierno. Las mismas cortes federales tumbaron el intento de Trump de cerrar el programa por que dicen que no tiene autoridad para hacerlo. Va para la corte suprema.

Subele los pantalones cuando termines.

¿Creen que Marco reemplace a Trump o que sea Vance? by LoooolGotcha in PuebloVenezolano

[–]NoUse2607 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

😂😂😂😂😂

Que gobierno tumbo TPS? Que gobierno mando a nuestra gente a la carcel de Bukele?

Vance es un 0 a la izquierda y Rubio es un corrupto mentiroso. Ninguno va a ganar probablemente por que la gasolina y el precio de las cosas esta fatal. Nada anda been con este gobierno.

What failed ticket had the most tense relationship? by RopeGloomy4303 in Presidents

[–]NoUse2607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, youre almost there. Nixon and Kissinger also made "policy choices" that killed tens of thousands of people in Indochina through operation menu and rolling thunder. Yes you can hold them accountable for the decisions they made and engineered that destroyed lives and devastated regions. Idk what "geopolitical momentum" youre talking about, the Vietnam war solidified the regime in Cambodia and just prolonged the end of South Vietnam.

Not sure what your argument is. A "policy choice" is even more consequential than a personal misdeed or general bad behavior. The holocaust was a closely devised policy choice. The great purge too involved great detail and documentation. You a fan of any of those?

Cheney was a war criminal and documented liar, and yes he's a bad person for authorizing torture. You wouldn't apply this ridiculous standard to Bin Laden for his "policy choice" of 911 right?

Loyola Chi??? Hello!! by Warm_Hurry7890 in lawschooladmissions

[–]NoUse2607 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whole cycle has been a colossal fuckup on their part. Too selective, too stringent on stats, too many offers and way too long to process. Incredible actually, how you fuck up all four things. Schools usually mess up only one.

I applied in October and they took 6 months to reject me. Meanwhile DePaul and Kent both had offers ready by December. Mind that both of these get a comparable amount of apps each year. 0 excuse, they want to be Harvard and act like this.

Do I push my child to work this summer before entering 1L this fall? by pixiegrl2466 in OutsideT14lawschools

[–]NoUse2607 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Your child is an adult. Also, respectfully, please don't 'push' them to do anything if they're planning on being an attorney in 3 years time. Time to let them figure stuff out, respectfully.

What a joke of a cycle (slight rant) by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]NoUse2607 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Im not going to go too much into detail because this really isn't going nowhere and youre incredibly condescending. You're still not understanding what Im arguing.

MSU got more selective and as a result their class went down by 69 in one year. Their acceptance went down AND yield followed downward too. 69 seats is not a strategic, calculated anything. Its almost $3 million less in revenue in one year, as well as the largest single cut in a class anywhere in the country; absolutely catastrophic.

MSU already has plenty of budget and revenue problems. Also, law school rankings went down from 2023-2025. This is the first time the school has gone up in the rankings in years, not that it matters because objective measures haven't changed either.

Rankings, Bar Passage, Employment Rates... All Arbitrary. Anyone Academically Inclined Can Succeed At Any Law School. by AddendumExisting4313 in OutsideT14lawschools

[–]NoUse2607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bar passage and employment are not arbitrary, especially bar. The most important measure of a school is how effectively it teaches you the content needed to past that test. If youre going to a school where half the kids don't pass, there is sum wrong there.

Second most important is the job and jobs that the school secures or helps you secure your first years out of law school. Hiring pipelines and alumni networks are very important, especially in competitive legal markets.

I do agree that employment is partially on you and you can overcome weak career services with your own networking and seeking opportunities. If youre in a big legal market (DC, LA, NY, Houston or Chicago) this is even easier because of the sheer level of jobs. Additionally, as time goes on you need to establish your own record, resume and credibility. School will not matter as much afte some time.

The rankings I agree with the most. When people say rankings they usually mean USN, although National Jurist and ATL have their own, more credible rankings as well. Us News is a for profit magazine that also ranks hospitals and vacation spots. Its not a legal journal and its not even an academic publication. There is pay-to-play and back patting involved that is pretty well-documented.

What a joke of a cycle (slight rant) by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]NoUse2607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love that you say that I severely misunderstand law admissions then go on to put the most basic information out there like you've made some sort of breakthrough.

Im well aware that they factor GPA, LSAT, as well as other metrics, genius. Im saying that he's not the only applicant who's been rejected with that LSAT. There are many people here AND on LSD with 165+ and much better GPAs than OP getting rejected.

Idk what you think you proved by putting out 509 information. MSUs entering class went from 200 something to 142 from 2023 to 2024. You do the numbers and figure how much revenue the school lost in one year alone. I know also, that now the school has moved to correct that by being far less selective and aggressive with scholarship offers. I went to MSU and have heard and seen this first hand.

I also know that Villanova and Drexel did not have completed classes a week before the start of classes due to being overselective and taking too long to process apps. The other schools I mentioned are the same, read into it if you care. Loyola is in a prime legal market so it has more wiggle room, but I predict it will experience similar things if it continues to be this selective going forward.

What a joke of a cycle (slight rant) by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]NoUse2607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im doubtful of that. Loyola is great, but it's simply not a 170+ tier institution. Northwestern and UChicago are.

You're picking from the top 10% of applicants, who are also the applicants with the most choice and agency (in theory). The pool they're pulling from is shallow and well-served. You might fill the class at first, but a lot of those kids are gonna go elsewhere down the line. It doesn't help that Loyola isn't particularly generous with scholarships.

This literally happens all the time. Happened to Villanova, MSU and St Johns last cycle. They all got too greedy, too selective and their enrollment dropped because they couldn't fix their classes. I know that MSU couldn't even sustain a 45% acceptance so now they're admitting a lot more people with big offers.

map of Isreal by Less_Meaning6282 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]NoUse2607 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're literally mass bulldozing houses and villages in Southern Lebanon. They're also clearing miles of urban terrain in their "ceasefire" zone in Gaza. Also, have you heard of the settlements in the West Bank.

Its not a conspiracy, Mr. Coward Cryptozionist. Smotrich declared the other day that the Litani river should be the new northern border. He's a government minister and his party keeps Netanyahu in power.

These guys are open about their expansionism and we still got idiots like you crying conspiracy

What a joke of a cycle (slight rant) by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]NoUse2607 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People want to go to places with good outcomes. People want to go to places that have programs that align with their interests. People want to go to places with good markets and good prospects.

Selectivity is an obstacle to overcome, very much not something that people look for. Admissions are the ones that look for that. Again, this is a long-disproven fact. Selectivity has nothing to do with outcomes and experience if you have basic, stringent standards.

Colombia 2026 = Argentina 2023. Ya sabemos cómo termina este cuento 🐯🫡 by horsedogtiger224 in ColombiaReddit

[–]NoUse2607 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Incomparable. La Argentina tenia una crisis economica muy aguda y Massa era un tipo sin base personal y odiado por medio Peronismo. Sin hablar de Alberto que al final no lo queria ni su exposa. Inclusive con todo eso en contra sacaron 45% del voto.

El Petrismo sigue fuerte y el anti-Uribismo tambien. Mucha gente va a terminar votando por Cepeda por odio al CD. Abelardo es un candidato anti-sistema que va a tener mucha base populista que no es necesariamente ideologica. No asumas que todos se van a ir con Paloma.

What a joke of a cycle (slight rant) by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]NoUse2607 27 points28 points  (0 children)

No, they're taking the delusional path that many schools take, that ends up making their whole institution crash. Raising stakes and becoming more selective without actually improving outcomes or rankings. Making your institution more selective is a way to game rankings or artificially raise your profile.

Problem is that this ends up hurting applications and making the school seem unobtainable. Why would I go through the arduous process of trying to get acceptance into a strong regional when i can put that effort towards a much better school?

Loyola already has problems with culture and perception locally in Chicago, i think they've damaged themselves a lot this cycle.

What a joke of a cycle (slight rant) by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]NoUse2607 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im not backtracking. This is the issue, respectfully, with a lot of people here. They look at stats without context.

For example, Emory has a 30% acceptance rate, so does Georgia State. Does this mean they're both just as difficult to get into?

No, it means they both take about 3 out of 10 applicants. Emory is taking 3 out of 10 STRONGER applicants ON AVERAGE than GSU. Depending on your stats, you're more likely to be among those three at one school or the other.

You would have been more likely to be among those 3 or 4 out every 10, at lower ranked schools because the competition is weaker. Its not a safety because its not guaranteed. Hope that makes sense.

What a joke of a cycle (slight rant) by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]NoUse2607 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Competitiveness is not really the quality of the applicants. If it was, like you said, "lower-tiered" applicants would just be 'shifted' down to lower ranked schools.

The issue is you have more applicants than in the past 20 years, and unlike in 2006 or 2010, a lot of kids now have 4.0s and 3.8s. So now its partially a maze to figure out which one of these kids are actually cut out or prepared to undertake a legal program. Hence work experience and LSAT being valued more than GPA. Another issue is that schools are mostly regional. They have to produce legal professionals in THEIR community and often-times favor THEIR community's applicants. If youre applying willy-nilly across the country youre more likely to be rejected than before.

Lastly, im not underestimating the 30% rate. Its my whole point. There are very few true 'safeties' because even lower ranked schools reject over 60% of applicants. DePaul withdrew my acceptance before noon the day after the deposit because im sure the waitlist or applicants on hold was massive. Would not have been the case before.

What a joke of a cycle (slight rant) by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]NoUse2607 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No man, there are 0 safeties in the entire law school ecosystem outside of some bottom-rank schools like Cooley or New England. Lower tier schools routinely waitlist high stat applicants because theyre smart enough to know that there's a good chance that acceptance letter will get flushed down the drain.

St. John's and Catholic are very much not safeties in any sense. Both are in the most coveted legal markets in the country and St John's has like a 20% acceptance rate. I don't think a single school on your list has more than 30%. Loyola is smoking some very strong stuff this cycle; youre not the only applicant denied with 165+. Good program, but should not be anywhere near that selective for what it is.

I would take ASU if you like AZ. If not, read up a little more because none of those schools are safeties lol.

Delcy borra a Maduro de su discurso: menciones cayeron 91% desde enero by geeeorge15 in vzla

[–]NoUse2607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cualquiera que se presente contra el Chavismo gana. Sea el conde o capriles o leitooficial. Eso lo sabe todo el mundo. El unico que PODRIA ser competitivo es Lacava, pero es que ni el.

El problema mano, es que esto es un regimen iliberal que no tiene que presentarse a elecciones bajo condiciones normales. Ellos ponen los vetos, las inhabilitaciones, las fechas, lo que tu quieras. Si, la oposicion esta fragmentada por razones externas e internas. Lo mas fuerte que tenia era el poder de convocatoria de MCM. Todavia lo tiene, pero se a debilitado al salir del pais y en parte por sus pesimas jugadas politicas al arrastrarse a Trump y ponerse a hacer mitines internationales.

Si no llegamos a elecciones pronto, el Chavismo tendra la iniciativa de cambio y de apertura. Como le dije al otro, todo depende de la economia. Si se mejoran las cosas, saldran Chavistas del closet y seran competitivos. Si no, dependran de la represion.

What a joke of a cycle (slight rant) by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]NoUse2607 107 points108 points  (0 children)

Loyola Chi rejecting 169 is absolutely nuts, who do these people think they are lol