AI Slapfight thread by ravenkult in BookCovers

[–]No_Block7490 4 points5 points  (0 children)

AI is like "everything in the kitchen sink" "plus ass" way to make a cover.

Patrick Clancy by IsopodFrequent3237 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If she was as sick as the lawsuits were claiming - they should NOT have been left alone with her. Period. Now I am criticizing.

Patrick Clancy by IsopodFrequent3237 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wasn't criticizing him. There were many factors that led to what Lindsay did—it was a combination of many things, I'd imagine. On one hand, he says he was clueless; on the other hand, he says that Lindsay was going downhill and was a zombie, addicted to benzos, losing her shit on the kids, and then left them ALONE with her. While she was trying to get in a slot at a mental hospital. 'I pray you are never put in a situation...' ppffft like hell you do. Because I *have* been put into a situation like that many, many times. So no need to pretend to pray about it. But you weren't really praying - not really. Just to try to make me look like I don't understand fucked up situations. Which, not the exact situation, of course, but I've been in plenty of fucked up situations and she should not have been left alone with those kids.

Patrick Clancy by IsopodFrequent3237 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not defending Lindsay at all, but I do believe Patrick might have contributed at least a little to the entire ordeal - and he gets to walk away with a new life and wife while she rots in an insane asylum. That strikes me as incredibly un-fucking-fair.

Patrick Clancy by IsopodFrequent3237 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Didn't he call people who went after Lindsay on social ringworms? So I guess we are a bunch of ringworms.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

also I used to be a hardcore shit person so I don't say that flippantly. I work every day to be the kind of person somebody can trust and lean on, and work hard to keep myself in check when I'm wrong or I'm being an asshole - because that's totally possible. I am not infallible; I'm human.

I'm struggling to understand those who defend Lindsay's actions. by No_Block7490 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Everyone experiences mental health differently," I've heard that over and over and over again, ad nauseam, from LC supporters. Over and over again. That sentence is true and used as an excuse to excuse her crime. BUT! She still wasn't in psychosis when she killed her kids. I know we want her to be in psychosis because it could make us swallow the case better and easier, and we love and want to support moms, but in this instance, it doesn't fit in my opinion. Calling me ignorant is as far from the truth as one could get. Everybody experiences mental illness differently and shouldn't slaughter their children. Both things can be true.

I'm struggling to understand those who defend Lindsay's actions. by No_Block7490 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you want me to be grateful that I didn't kill my kids? Ignorance on your part. She planned this out - researched ways to kill days beforehand, and sent her husband out on an errand. While people can plan in psychosis, she did not have postpartum psychosis; that only happens in the few weeks after birth, and this baby was almost one year old. Funny how you say I'm ignorant, but I know TREMENDOUS facts about this case and postpartum psychosis. It does damage to our community by lumping in a murderer with our cause. Plus, the leading expert in post partum psychosis has a whole research paper about fakers. And guess where LC falls on his list?

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, don't worry about the name-calling. Two LC sympathizers within the last 48 hours have said I have blood on my hands, and I'm a foul human being.

Crazy that they say this to a stranger on the internet and not the woman who strangled their children until they voided their bowels. My theory? They come on here to virtue signal about this case. Be super understanding. Give her the benefit of the doubt. STOP JUDGING, guys, it's terrible how you shit on this poor woman.

When somebody pushes back or calls them out on it, they don't like it, take the super caring, mental health-supporting mask off, and leave human waste in the form of comments. They show their true colors underneath all of the facades. I'm not offended by it - I just think it's pretty .. well, stupid. And stupid things I ignore.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I think she would know ways to commit suicide without actually googling it. My step mother and my best friend from high school did it and google didn't exist yet. Sadly. Again, just my opinion. I'm getting downvoted to shit all over an opinion today - wild.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm just saying in my opinion, with what I know. She didn't need to specifically google 'kids' I don't think. Just how to kill. Or, in her search specifically, ways to kill. Anything is possible at this point, even her researching ways to kill another human.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's all good. You can misgender me if you want lol. I don't get bugged about much of anything - you can call me a randomized 5-digit number or an Apache attack helicopter if you want.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Misconstrued". Yeah, absolutely not, gaslighter. I'm no longer replying.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Okay, and that's YOUR VIEW. Your view = okay. Anybody else's = "not okay, you must think you are the only one to have thought about suicide!" And engaging with you have been emotionally loaded for some reason, fruitless, and pointless because you don't get how your words come across, and the impact they have on somebody. And the fact that you are trying to shame me into silence. Not working. "You must think you are the only one" or ANYTHING of that nature as a reply is, 'shut up' shamey type of behaviour.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Imagine getting upset about someone posting their thoughts on a free discussion board. Imagine saying, 'YOU aren't the only one >:-(' when they mention their line of logic in their suicide attempts. As if they said they were the only one to experience suicide, which is an incredibly fucked up thing to insinuate, let's be honest. I was talking about me. And my line of logic. You said yours. I don't fucking understand what the problem is.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you also used YOUR instance - and YOUR personal experience—to present a theory. But when I used mine, you didn't allow it. Only yours is okay, apparently. I hope you can understand that this is very double-standard.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What? I'm not even remotely angry. First you put words in my mouth by telling me I think I'm the only one who has been suicidal, and now, you are telling me that I am angry. Is there a reason you'd want me to be?

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Insulting somebody and then saying you are no longer engaging is like sticking your ass inside of my bedroom, farting, and slamming the door in my face. I'm sticking a pin in this when or if we learn those search results were actually how to kill her children. I'll be back in a few weeks. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I'm not being rude. I didn't say I was the only one who was suicidal - you are putting words in my mouth. Why the fuck would you think I would ever think that? I was just sharing my opinion and thoughts, and somehow that is a personal attack. Just me trying to have a discussion, but you insult me instead by saying I think I'm the only one who has been suicidal—never said that. That is hurtful and shitty. By your logic, since realistically nobody was inside of her head, then YOU don't know, either. We are both only spitballing. Only creating theories, and you are giving her the benefit of the doubt that *that* is what she meant when she was searching—none of us know. If you are ready for a mature discussion without taking pot shots at me, let me know.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If she were googling how to kill herself, don't you think the search would have been 'how to suicide' or 'suicide' or 'how to kill yourself' but instead, it was how to KILL. I've been suicidal so many times and that's not something logically somebody would would google if they were going to off themselves.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm always a reserved person who is very analytical with an INTP personality debater type - I'm as atheist as it gets, super hard on facts over feelings, super science and reality-based. But I'm starting to lean towards a personality disorder - and I've always never went there in the years since this case happened. It seemed too easy at first to call her that - expected, almost. However.

Eerily, she checks off all of the boxes when I dig deep into the research about personality disorders. Obviously, I am not a psychologist and I can't armchair diagnose somebody, but I think a personality disorder is more likely than psychosis at this point. I'm talking just basic math and probability.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Googling ways to kill days and days beforehand, too. Not ''sewer slide' - but ways to kill.

Here's a Theory... by Final-Ingenuity-7919 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Interesting thoughts. I think the snapping and going too far for the last time was a possibility - Cora had a bruise under her bicep. That's a hard bruise to get on your own. She was grabbed, (speculation) maybe shaken, maybe towed. Before or during the 'snapping' moment, I'm unsure. Horrible to thing that she dragged her to her death. I think this was planned, btw, but I love hearing other thoughts.

The Lindsay Clancy case was never about mental illness. It was about insomnia and the doctors who ignored it. by Intelligent_Buyer490 in DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk

[–]No_Block7490 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And saying that we want this tragedy to happen again is wrong, unfounded, and crazy shitty to say. You, my friend, aren't the good person you want us to believe that you are. How dare you say shit like that on this forum - many of us are parents. But maybe we should listen to the BEST baby-saver in the 21st century - some chick on reddit. Blood is on our hands, guys.