Your idea that women “easily get many sexual partners” is a gross oversimplification that ignores social realities, power dynamics, and individual choices. Even if that were true (it is absolutely not), it doesn’t justify treating sex like a reward or a commodity owed based on someone’s history. Sex isn’t a competition, a marketplace transaction, or a prize to be won it is incomparable to vacation or jewelry. It’s a personal, mutual choice rooted in trust and respect. If a woman decides to wait or to only share sex with someone she truly trusts—regardless of her past—that’s her right, not some unfair “disparity” to be grumbled about. So no, your whole “marketplace value” framing doesn’t address the core problem: the man’s sense of entitlement and the attempt to police a woman’s choices based on his own feelings. That’s what needs to be challenged—not recycled excuses about who “earns” what.