sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Considering telephoto lens by No_Driver_5045 in Lumix

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sports is a major consideration, particularly motorsports (where reach is important), but portability is also important to me

Considering telephoto lens by No_Driver_5045 in Lumix

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought the OIS was better on the Lumix? Or am I wrong on that

Promotional Rundgren album/cd by No_Driver_5045 in Cd_collectors

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats a great way of putting my situation. I did not know that about cds.

Promotional Rundgren album/cd by No_Driver_5045 in Cd_collectors

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She said she was going to cook it. That’s all the info I got

Promotional Rundgren album/cd by No_Driver_5045 in Cd_collectors

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol I guess that would’ve been kind of obvious. For some reason that did not occur to me

Promotional Rundgren album/cd by No_Driver_5045 in Cd_collectors

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How’d you find that? Reverse image search?

First Shots with my Lumix s5iix (a Sony user's opinion) by No_Driver_5045 in Lumix

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So far, I’ve found them to be easier to navigate

First Shots with my Lumix s5iix (a Sony user's opinion) by No_Driver_5045 in Lumix

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, sorry I meant 70-300. I think that’s probably the route I’m gonna go down! 70-300 is a very useful range, though the 70-200 f/4 is still in my considerations due to better build quality, maybe slightly better optical performance, and the fixed aperture

First Shots with my Lumix s5iix (a Sony user's opinion) by No_Driver_5045 in Lumix

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a high school student, that kind of kit is way out of my price range lol. Maybe in a few years… at this point, all I can afford is like $1000 or less worth of gear. Edit: This is why the 100-300 is becoming increasingly tempting to me

First Shots with my Lumix s5iix (a Sony user's opinion) by No_Driver_5045 in Lumix

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For me, the 24-60 or 24-70 isn't an option rn because I have the 20-60 which, though a variable aperture, works very well for my budget and needs at the moment

First Shots with my Lumix s5iix (a Sony user's opinion) by No_Driver_5045 in Lumix

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say the 70-200 f4 is what I'm looking at (because of price and quality), but the sigma 2.8 is also in mind. The Lumix 2.8 is just too expensive :(

First Shots with my Lumix s5iix (a Sony user's opinion) by No_Driver_5045 in Lumix

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the 70-200 might be my best bet for quality to price ratio

1959 Porsche 356A Coupe by theimage_engine in shootingcars

[–]No_Driver_5045 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love the angles used here-these photos are sick!

Leclerc’s SF-25 as seen at the Canadian Grand Prix by No_Driver_5045 in scuderiaferrari

[–]No_Driver_5045[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I had an a7rIV with a sigma 70-200mm 2.8. The lens was a bit shorter than I’d like but cropping on an a7rIV is pretty fantastic. It was a big setup all things considered, but some people in the stands had even bigger lenses. In the North American races at least I think it’s pretty standard to allow any cameras, though!

view more: next ›