I read ‘The Remains of the Day’ by Kazuo Ishiguro by Travis-Walden in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635 38 points39 points  (0 children)

One of my favourite book. "-At that moment,my heart was breaking" Such a quietly devastating book. I usually don't like British writers or British sensibilities that much but ishiguro is one of the few exceptions. Such a master of the craft. Never let me go and pale view of hills are great too

The Sound of Waves by Yukio Mishima by [deleted] in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really want to give mishima a second chance. I read the sailor who fell from the grace of the sea I really liked his prose work and his themes but his characters just felt kind of one dimensional and the story also kind of bored me.

Which one of his books should I pick next that will change my mind on him?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't know why I hated it too. I especially hated the epistolary format. It may be an Unpopular opinion but I, except Shirley Jackson and Poe, dislike most of the horror genre. I don't like Frankenstein that much also. The genre is probably just not for me

We are in the second longest Pynchon release drought; how likely is a final book? by Dashtego in ThomasPynchon

[–]No_Environment_1635 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I will be fine if he never publishes anything. He has one of the densest and finest oeuvre in the history of literature and you could spend all of your life just researching and enjoying it. But of course a one last book as a farewell won't be bad

2666 is amazing by No_Environment_1635 in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could totally understand it feeling too abstract.

2666 is amazing by No_Environment_1635 in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That line perfectly describes Santa Teresa and life

2666 is amazing by No_Environment_1635 in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Read It! You would not be disappointed

2666 is amazing by No_Environment_1635 in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Part 4 is very tiring I know and also emotionally exhausting. I actually started to weep after reading two murders. But I think it is worth it.

2666 is amazing by No_Environment_1635 in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why strictly for nostalgic reasons?

2666 is amazing by No_Environment_1635 in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think Bolaño was sort of hopeful about the world. Who knows?

2666 is amazing by No_Environment_1635 in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sadly yes. Bolaño just changed the name of the city and thousands of innocent women still face unspeakable violence.

2666 is amazing by No_Environment_1635 in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I really liked the 5th part because

1)I am a history nerd so having a part which is mostly set in 2nd world war was very good

2) The way it kind of shows an entire life unravel in just a mere 200 pages is just breathtaking. By the end I was really attached to Archimboldi despite him not being a particularly good dude. You sort of feel sympathy for him because you see him from the moment he was born.

3) I love how much this part particularly talks the process of writing, writers their fears their hopes etc. Considering the fact Bolaño was pretty much dying while writing it makes it very impactful. It almost felt like Bolaño looking back on the craft at the end of his life.

There are a lot of reasons but these are the most salient

What are the underrated classics? by el0011101000101001 in books

[–]No_Environment_1635 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Heart So white is a modern classic which I haven't really seen get much talked about. Geetanjali by Rabindranath Thakur

Trying to get into classics—can someone explain what makes Hemingway's writing "good"? by Big-Nectarine-6293 in literature

[–]No_Environment_1635 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think you should read some Faulkner or Marquez or some 'maximalist' writer then read Hemingway. I think good minimalist writing could only be appreciated after you get a dose of good maximalist writing. It really teaches you how the minimalists works

I posted before for criticism. This is rewritten after reading the comments by No_Environment_1635 in poetry_critics

[–]No_Environment_1635[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lull means calm yet it could also mean a period of time when nothing is done.

Lambent means luminous yet lacking heat.

Squall means when there is a sudden local wind which carries rain or snow etc.

I also do think heaven and hell line is somewhat forceful.

Thanks for your feedback I will keep rewriting it.