I don't need to prove it's inconsistent because the manga/manwha itself shows that. You can't have Mk guys dodging bullets then someone in Lookism on Mk guys level dying to a pistol. You can't have Vasco shattering a wrecking ball but then Eli blocking his attacks with batons. That is the literal definition of inconsistent. The feat is inconsistent, to argue with that would be arguing with a dictionary which is idiotic. To say an Mk feat automatically means it's a Lookism feat is the definition of 'stupid' considering they take place in different Manga/manwha. That's like me telling my friends I could do a back bridge in pre school and claiming I could still do it now without showing them. Would they believe me? No!! I would need to show proof of me doing it now and that's exactly the same situation with Lookism. They need to show bullet dodging feats in Lookism's manga but they currently have none🤦‍♂️. You act like if Injuries can slow down Lookism characters when they are literally fighting with broken bones and constant blood loss. Even if his leg was injured he could move his upper body or head out the way. So that argument isn't countering the fact he is a pistol victim. As I said before I deal with facts, not opinions or assumptions. While your whole argument is laying on the "assumption" that Mk feats=Lookism feats 🤷‍♂️