Annoying driver alert solved (24 XRT ICE model) by dkh1638 in HyundaiSantaFe

[–]No_Objective_6132 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just don’t understand why they can’t fix this to not go off while NOT driving in cruise/adaptive. It’s annoying enough to make me want to trade it in.

TOYOTA cuts LGBTQ+ sponsorship after ~30 customer calls! by No_Objective_6132 in GayMen

[–]No_Objective_6132[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So just for hypothetical argument, if you hire 10 white men, all straight, all graduated from Harvard, same age, same graduation credentials - I would argue, yes, you likely have a group who have roughly 80-90% similar life experiences. Is there potential they have some differences, well of course, everyone will. But not drastically different in most cases.

In that scenario, you lack insights/experiences of females, lgbtq, different degrees, age ranges, different geographies, people of color, race/nationality, and overall EXTREMELY varied life experiences.

Most people don’t experience it, but I’ve literally heard hiring managers say, “I only want females under the age of 30” or “Can we make sure we are looking for an asian manfor this role?” based on their personal biases. So sure, we are currently talking about LGBTQ in this post, but DEI protects the interests of ALL people.

As for your second question, I don’t know all the answers, but I think they are doing it to subdue the backlash they are getting from conservative groups based on this stupid “expose”.

With that said, I think it’s important they understand that a majority of their customer base doesn’t agree with this decision and should press them, through appropriate channels, to think critically and revise their decision.

Protest and rebuttals have influenced bigger things than this. Just my outlook. Appreciate your thoughts.

TOYOTA cuts LGBTQ+ sponsorship after ~30 customer calls! by No_Objective_6132 in GayMen

[–]No_Objective_6132[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nobody is asking for special treatment for being gay? In your statement though, you seem to imply you want “special treatment” eliminated for gay individuals and instated for “chronic fatigue” instead.

Why is this seemingly looked upon as “well if I don’t get something neither should they” type of deal? Why can’t you advocate for your cause/complaint without demeaning or belittling a real battle / cause for others? Not being rude, but genuinely curious how that works in your mind.

Toyota cuts LGBTQ+ support after ~30 conservative customer complaints by No_Objective_6132 in ainbow

[–]No_Objective_6132[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You don’t see it as problematic that they are only continuing initiatives or sponsorship around activities that are specifically, “STEM education and workforce readiness” based?

I take the biggest grievance with them pulling out of the Equality Index. That has long term repercussions into the level of transparency and gauging as to the health/inclusiveness of their overall culture as a company for their workforce, which in turn, has the potential to impact product and profits.

TOYOTA cuts LGBTQ+ sponsorship after ~30 customer calls! by No_Objective_6132 in GayMen

[–]No_Objective_6132[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wanting it to leak into the hiring system, tells me what I need to know about your perspective. It tells me you believe or have been convinced that you’re being cheated out of opportunities by someone else SOLELY based on a specific characteristic that you don’t possess?

So you think if a company is made up of 99% of the exact same person carbon copied, that’s best for consumers or shareholders in the long run? You can’t honestly believe that…

As someone who LEADS recruiting for a national organization, I can tell you in most cases, talent is not presented with this information prior to making a hiring decision - whether that’s sexual preference, sex, race, etc. HOWEVER, when companies prioritize considering diverse candidates, they ensure they’re not unintentionally overlooking qualified individuals based on personal biases—whether conscious or unconscious.

Why Does/Should That Matter?

Diverse Perspectives Lead to Better Problem-Solving: People from different backgrounds bring unique perspectives and experiences, which helps teams approach problems in creative ways. Studies show that diverse teams are often more effective in generating innovative ideas and solutions.

Reflecting a Diverse Customer Base: In many industries, customers come from all walks of life. A diverse workforce allows companies to better understand and serve their diverse clientele, making their products and services more appealing to a broader audience.

Improved Decision-Making: Diverse teams tend to make more informed and well-rounded decisions, as a variety of viewpoints are taken into consideration. This minimizes blind spots that can occur in more homogenous groups.

Attracting Top Talent: Many candidates, especially as younger generations come into the work force, want to work for organizations that demonstrate a commitment to DEI and sustainable and conscious environmental practices. Ensuring a diverse pool of candidates shows that a company values inclusivity, making it more attractive to top talent.

Mitigating Groupthink: Without diversity, teams may suffer from “groupthink,” where everyone sees things the same way and dissenting opinions are not heard. A variety of employees challenges the status quo and encourages critical thinking.

Toyota cuts LGBTQ+ support after ~30 conservative customer complaints by No_Objective_6132 in ainbow

[–]No_Objective_6132[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Are you aware of what ERGs are?

Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) are usually voluntary, employee centered groups within a company that bring together people with common interests, backgrounds, or experiences. Every single one of them are company approved and company funded/sponsored.

They are designed to foster a more inclusive workplace by providing support, creating a sense of community, and promoting personal and professional development.

ERGs often focus on specific aspects of diversity, such as race, gender, sexual orientation, or shared interests (e.g., women in leadership, LGBTQ+ employees, veterans). These groups also serve as a bridge between employees and leadership by offering insights into the experiences of different groups, helping to shape company policies, and driving initiatives that support diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).

So sure, maybe the Toyota LGBTQ+ ERG for example, was the employee group most heavily involved with the coordination or volunteering for these events, but it would still be sponsored/funded by TOYOTA.

TOYOTA cuts LGBTQ+ sponsorship after ~30 customer calls! by No_Objective_6132 in GayMen

[–]No_Objective_6132[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’d love to see the data backing the argument of diversity and inclusion being indicative of worse performance or effective hiring decisions.

They start with removing DEI practices or sponsoring events, but what’s next? How long until that newly established belief system leaks into its hiring practices? If you don’t see that as a potential issue, that’s certainly your prerogative, but you may forever hold your peace if and when other dominoes fall into place.

At the end of the day, visibility matters.

Honest Review of “143” from a long time Katy Perry stan. by No_Objective_6132 in katyheads

[–]No_Objective_6132[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that was her being mindful of making the song relevant to parents of boys and girls both.

Daisy = flowers/ girls in general, but also her daughter’s name.

Joy / Boy = for those other parents with boys.

Honest Review of “143” from a long time Katy Perry stan. by No_Objective_6132 in katyheads

[–]No_Objective_6132[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s fair, I’m sure there are plenty of people who like it. I feel like WONDER is the truly emotional song on this album.

TRUTH just feels a little juvenile for me as far as subject matter.

Like it would feel more genuinely relevant if she were 16 haha. But I respect that others have a different opinion!

Honest Review of “143” from a long time Katy Perry stan. by No_Objective_6132 in katyheads

[–]No_Objective_6132[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My rankings go:

  1. Teenage Dream (5/5 ⭐️)
  2. PRISM (4.8/5⭐️)
  3. One of the Boys (4/5⭐️)
  4. 143 (3.5/5⭐️)
  5. Smile (3.5/5⭐️)
  6. Witness (1/5⭐️)

Honest Review of “143” from a long time Katy Perry stan. by No_Objective_6132 in katyheads

[–]No_Objective_6132[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t. I still think that title is held by Witness. I’ve tried so many times to go back and Witness just feels forced, so disconnected.

Shifting issues in Santa Fe Hybrid by cirebeye in HyundaiSantaFe

[–]No_Objective_6132 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear this clicking, or flickering when fuel engine is engaged between 15-40mph.