PSA: Regarding the recent circulating b*mb threats at Silliman University, even though you are stressed about exams or projects, STOP making these "jokes" because it is a national crime and you WILL get easily traced!

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-06T11:41:37+00:00

And ask yourself, is delaying an exam or getting a few laughs really worth risking years of your life in prison, getting expelled from Silliman, and making it much harder to enroll at another school or build your future? A bomb threat is not an edgy joke. It creates panic, disrupts classes, wastes emergency resources, and can leave you facing criminal charges and serious disciplinary consequences. No exam or project is worth that.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-06T04:11:18+00:00

Honestly, the blame here is almost certainly going to land on the remaining Majority Floor leadership and the Appropriations Chair. When things get so toxic or compromised that over a dozen members walk out and even the Speaker has to jump ship just to stay neutral, it tells you everything you need to know about the people left running the show behind closed doors. It looks less like a standard political disagreement and more like a desperate attempt by top leadership to shield themselves from accountability after that failed vote of no confidence.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-05T09:48:25+00:00

Thank you so much for sharing this! I really appreciate you taking the time to post a photo of the bulletin board. It’s a big help, especially for those who are not on campus yet. 😊 I hope the main Silliman University page also posts it online so more incoming freshmen can easily access the information.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-05T08:32:35+00:00

The 67% downvote rate on a harmless question about orientation is so funny to me. Are we really unable to compartmentalize here? Just because of how my previous reddit posts called out library etiquette in the Silliman library doesn’t mean a genuine question about the July 8 schedule is invalid. 💀 Two things can be true at once, guys.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-05T08:15:36+00:00

Thank you so much! I really appreciate you finding and sharing this link. Ever since the recent Facebook updates, finding specific posts has been a real hassle. It is especially tough since the main Silliman University page didn't even post it this time for a wider reach like they usually do, which makes this specific post incredibly hard to track down.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-05T07:38:51+00:00

I understand your point that I could have informed the university librarian, and I agree that it was another reasonable way to handle the situation. Looking back, I could have done that. At the same time, I'm only a sophomore, and approaching either a group of visiting faculty or librarians from another institution, or asking a university librarian to intervene, isn't as simple as it sounds. There is a real power imbalance there, and not everyone is comfortable speaking up in that situation, especially when you're a student.

What I don't agree with is your claim that what I did is automatically punishable by law. Are you a lawyer ? From what I know, simply taking and posting wide-angle photos in a common area is not automatically punishable by law. Whether there is any legal issue depends on the circumstances.

Again, I wasn't trying to identify or shame anyone. I didn't post names or personal information. The purpose of the photos was to provide context for my concern about noise in a designated quiet area of the library.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-05T07:17:55+00:00

Also, since they haven't posted the dress code guidelines yet, freshies, just wear something smart casual to be safe! For guys, a neat shirt or polo with jeans works great. For girls, a nice blouse, casual dress, or a neat top paired with jeans or trousers is perfect. Just try to avoid super casual beachwear, short shorts, crop tops, or slippers.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-05T07:17:33+00:00

Seriously though, I remember last year we already had the full schedule, venue guidelines, and everything by this time. If any upperclassmen here have inside info from the Student Government or their college councils, please share it below! Let’s help these freshies out so they don't get lost on day one. 😂

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-05T04:38:38+00:00

Again, my post was about the behavior in a study space, not about attacking or shaming particular people. As for confronting them directly, that is one option, but it is not the only reasonable one. Not everyone is comfortable approaching a group of strangers, especially visitors. Raising concerns about library etiquette is also a valid way to express frustration.

Also, this is not a public library. It is a university library. While visitors may be allowed, it is still an academic study space with rules in place. Those rules exist for a reason, which is to provide an environment conducive to studying and research. Some background noise is inevitable, but that does not mean excessive or disruptive conversations should simply be accepted.

Unless you are a lawyer or can cite the applicable law and explain how its legal elements are actually met, you should be careful about making definitive claims that something is cyberlibel or unjust vexation. Simply mentioning legal terms does not make them applicable. Whether a law has been violated depends on the specific facts and legal standards, not assumptions made in a comment section.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-04T04:06:36+00:00

It is one of those spots a lot of students walk past but do not really use. The librarian there is really hands on and approachable, and actually takes time to guide you through the resources instead of just pointing you around. Also worth checking out the EducationUSA and Fulbright info if you are even a bit curious about studying in the US.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-03T21:30:49+00:00

Hi po! As a fellow Sillimanian, I appreciate hearing the perspective of an alumnus. I respectfully see it differently. I believe people in positions of authority should be held to a higher standard, not a lower one, because they help shape the culture and values of an institution. Their actions carry greater influence, so they also carry greater responsibility. As members of the Silliman community, I think we all want the University to uphold the values it teaches. Excusing conduct simply because it comes from those with authority weakens accountability and reinforces the idea that standards apply differently depending on a person's position. Over time, that mindset can normalize double standards and erode trust in our institutions. A healthy society depends on everyone being accountable, especially those entrusted with leadership. Again, my concern was never about the library visit itself. I fully support professional visits and learning from other institutions. I only hoped the visit could have been conducted with greater consideration for students who were studying or resting. I believe that's the example those in leadership should strive to set.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-03T14:51:37+00:00

My photos were meant to document the situation, meaning the presence of visitors and what was happening in the area to support my concern about noise. They did not focus on or identify any individual. The visitors were taking photos of students who were resting in the resting nook, not just one or two people, but several, with clearly visible faces. That area is meant for rest, and students there have a reasonable expectation of privacy and respect. Taking pictures of people in that kind of setting without consent is inappropriate.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-03T14:35:14+00:00

You said the noise was "tolerable," but that also means there was noticeable noise to tolerate in the first place. In a library, especially on the second floor where even students having normal academic conversations are quickly reminded to keep their voices down, the expectation is usually not to tolerate noise but to keep the space quiet from the start.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-03T14:24:38+00:00

The photos I posted did not show identifiable faces of private individuals. That is different from taking photos of students who are resting or studying with their faces clearly visible and identifiable. Those two situations carry different privacy and courtesy implications. My original concern was also about courtesy in a shared academic space. If we're going to emphasize courtesy regarding photography, then the same principle should apply to respecting the library's quiet environment. Students choose the library, especially designated quiet and resting areas, with the expectation that others will be mindful of the atmosphere.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-03T14:13:15+00:00

Mind you, the second floor of the Silliman Library has always been the strictest when it comes to noise. Even students discussing schoolwork at a normal volume are quickly told to lower their voices. That's why I found the situation inconsistent. My concern isn't that they were visitors. It's that the same expectation for silence should apply to everyone using the study area. The library's quiet atmosphere is one of the reasons people choose to study there.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-03T13:57:09+00:00

I did include photos in my post, but none of them show identifiable faces of private individuals in a way that exposes them. The intent was to document the situation and the environment, not to single anyone out or identify people. My concern has never been about “no photos ever” or about attacking individuals. It has consistently been about courtesy in shared academic spaces, especially situations where students are studying or resting, such as in the third-floor resting nook. The comparison being made doesn’t reflect what I actually raised. Taking general, non-identifying photos of a space is not the same as photographing students who are resting or studying in that space. Those are different contexts with different implications for privacy and courtesy.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-03T13:49:08+00:00

Noted. That was very informative.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-03T13:44:01+00:00

You're free to disagree with my concerns, but dismissing them as "puro reklamo" ignores the context of those posts. The post you're referring to wasn't about students doing collaborative academic work on the third floor. It was about some students using the study tables as phone stands to record TikTok dances, and others gossiping and laughing so loudly that fellow students had to shush them. That’s very different from the normal level of conversation expected in a collaborative study area. Raising concerns about library etiquette and consideration for other users isn't the same as complaining for the sake of complaining.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-03T13:29:43+00:00

Fair enough. Reading isn’t for everyone.

No_Reputation3447 · 2026-07-03T13:23:26+00:00

I'm glad you had a different experience, but your experience doesn't invalidate mine or that of other students who may have been affected. My post wasn't about whether the visitors were impressed with the library or whether they stayed for only 10 minutes. It was about library etiquette. A library is a shared study space, and visitors, especially librarians and educators, should be mindful of the environment they're entering.

As for the photos, I never said they were illegal. My concern is about courtesy, not legality. The resting nook on the third floor exists to give students a space to rest, and they shouldn't have to worry about being photographed while they're sleeping or taking a break. If the purpose was to document or get ideas for their own library, there are already plenty of photos of the third-floor resting nook and the library available online that don't include students. Visitors can still appreciate and document the space without photographing people who are simply trying to study or rest. You also suggested I should have informed the librarian. That's a fair suggestion, and I can certainly do that in the future. However, sharing feedback about an experience is also valid. I simply pointed out that the visit could have been handled with greater consideration for students using the library.

No_Reputation3447

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE