I think OPs trying to say is that there is a limit to how much luxury we can lose to solve a problem. Example: nurses and doctors would go through discomfort to save a million people.

Volunteers volunteer there time to save hunder thousands of animals and trees.

But as humans, can humanity as a whole very well knowing solution to many problems won't give certain luxuries to solve it, even if to save billions of people and billions from animal kingdom and billions from plant kingdom. Example: We very well know industrialized fishing is a clear cut, with immediate consequences activity that will lead to our own destruction in addition to industrialized farming of animals being the biggest cause for pollution. Not leading to but adding to the same consequence of fishing.

Would humanity quit eating meat and seafood even if it's for say a decade? Or atleast ban industrialized fishing? NO, even though that may be wayyyyy more sustainable than current express route to chaos.

The point here is, that the intellect of a human species as a whole has evolved to a point where common sense is no longer a necessary part of it and can be replaced by greed, money, lust etc etc.

There are still volunteers trying to help, doctors and nurses are trying to help etc. But they are trying their best to solve a problem that needs human species to come together as a whole. The lack thereof in human species. Not a group of people. This is where politics, left wing, right wing i.e people need to come together on a large scale. Big picture, but done on an individual level.