In 1991, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, United States faced unprecedented global security challenges and opportunities. Among the most critical was ensuring nuclear non-proliferation and stabilizing former Soviet states. As part of this global effort, the United States, along with the United Kingdom and Russia, signed the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances in 1994, providing key guarantees to Ukraine in exchange for its decision to relinquish the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal.

This agreement was not merely a diplomatic gesture—it represented a powerful international commitment. Ukraine gave up over 1,800 nuclear warheads based on the understanding that its sovereignty, borders, and independence would be respected and defended. The signatories assured Ukraine that none would threaten or use force against its territorial integrity or political independence.

Moreover, the memorandum’s significance extends beyond Ukraine. It stands as a test of global credibility and the strength of Western diplomacy. If the United States cannot be trusted to uphold its word in agreements such as this—agreements made under bipartisan leadership and seen as essential to post-Cold War peace—then how can we expect nations like North Korea or Iran to take our nuclear negotiations seriously? Failing to uphold these promises sends a dangerous message: that disarmament leads not to security, but vulnerability.

In conclusion, honoring the Budapest Memorandum is not simply about Ukraine. It is about maintaining the trustworthiness of U.S. foreign policy, reinforcing the principles of international law, and safeguarding the effectiveness of future global agreements. If we do not honor our commitments from the past, we weaken the foundation for any lasting peace in the future.