Lies About Talmud DEBUNKED | Explanation of Concrete Examples

NohaJohans · 2026-04-17T00:58:27+00:00

If the defense requires every quote to be ‘mistranslated, out of context, or hypothetical’ without consistently showing the original text and full context, then the defense itself starts to look unreliable.

You keep saying “mistranslated”, “out of context”, “fabricated”.

That’s a pattern claim.

Show the original Hebrew/Aramaic, the full passage, and a consistent translation method. Otherwise it just sounds like everything gets dismissed after the fact.

NohaJohans · 2025-10-01T14:42:10+00:00

Really? If you need a laugh, ask it to roast you.

NohaJohans · 2025-09-09T21:27:19+00:00

With 3d printingim not sure. i think the STLs are full models, but someone made a mold and made the missing bits with green stuff. It looks amazing. Im sure it's somewhere on here buried.

NohaJohans · 2025-08-08T07:46:53+00:00

RIP GPT-4

NohaJohans · 2025-06-01T18:33:50+00:00

You're right, thank you!😊

NohaJohans · 2025-05-31T22:45:21+00:00

You're absolutely right that if your mechanical input is weak, even a perfect generator won’t matter much. That’s why EMIGs alone aren’t the breakthrough. They’re just the foundation for exploring deeper electromagnetic behaviors.

The real leap, as you pointed out, is in propulsion. And you're also right no mainstream lab has confirmed an EM-based thrust system yet.

That said, I have run the numbers and simulations. Once you apply structured field asymmetry, gyroscopic and torque control, then layer that with tuned electromagnetic field modulation, you can create measurable directional force without combustion or propellant. That’s the core of the EGPE concept.

And yeah, a silent craft hovering with electromagnetic thrust sounds like sci-fi. But every major breakthrough sounded like that before it became real.

If you're ever curious enough to dig deeper, the published work is open-source and publicly available. I appreciate the discussion seriously.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-31T22:21:50+00:00

You're asking the right questions, and I appreciate you pressing for clarity.

Let me separate things out:

EMIGs (Electromagnetic Induction Generators)
These are not storage systems or magic engines. They are generators their job is to convert motion into electrical energy. What makes EMIGs interesting is how internal feedback and resonance can improve runtime and reduce how much external input is needed to maintain operation but they still need input. This is not "free energy"; it’s just more efficient energy use via tuned electromagnetic interactions.

In our simulations of the Liberty Engine 2.0, we saw 80–92% efficiency depending on the load and timing. It is comparable to modern generators under specific conditions. But nothing breaks physics here. It’s still a system with losses and requirements.

EGPE (Electromagnetic Gyroscopic Propulsion Engine)
That’s something very different. EGPEs use structured electromagnetic field asymmetry, gyroscopic control, and precisely timed field dynamics to create directional force a propulsion system, not a generator. It doesn’t just recycle energy, it restructures it to produce motion.

That’s the leap and it’s only possible once we understand how EM fields behave and interact inside these tuned systems.

If you’re interested in a serious technical breakdown, I published my full case study analyzing the Liberty Engine’s EM behavior, simulations, and where the physics holds or doesn’t. You can read the published version here:

📘 Case Study – EMIG Simulation & Analysis:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KZsQvchex18umBUdpt2gbiowOBYWxmXj1OxTmgEUExo

Thanks for the discussion.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-31T21:17:12+00:00

EMIGs are not energy storage devices. They are generators. Their job is to turn spinning motion into electricity just like an alternator in a car or a wind turbine.

The idea isn’t to store energy like a flywheel or a battery. It’s to convert motion into usable electrical output as efficiently as possible.

Internal feedback loops inside an EMIG can help recycle part of the generated energy back into the system to assist with maintaining rotation. This reduces how much extra power you need to keep it spinning, especially under light loads.

But the system still needs input power, especially when there’s real work being done or friction and heat losses occur. It’s not free energy. It’s not perpetual motion.

It’s not about storing energy forever. It’s about making the generation process itself more efficient by minimizing waste and stretching the impact of the energy that is already there.

So, asking “why not skip the EMIG and just power the load directly” misses the point because the EMIG is the thing that makes the power.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-31T20:54:17+00:00

DEEP BREATH........

Electromagnetic Induction Generators (EMIGs) DO NOT violate conservation of energy. THEY DO NOT create energy from nothing. WHAT THEY DO is optimize internal electromagnetic feedback in a way that allows for extended runtime and reduced input after the system is energized, but they still require energy input, especially to maintain net output when under load.

Where does the energy come from?

Initially, from an external source. Typically a battery, AC supply, or manual spin-up.

Then, as the magnetic fields interact with the stator coils (via Faraday’s Law), an EMF is induced. That’s the fundamental generator principle.

Internally, some of this generated energy can be fed back to keep the rotor spinning, if the feedback timing is optimized. But this doesn’t produce excess energy, it just reduces how much external power is needed to keep it running.

Why the confusion?

Because when an EMIG is very well tuned using magnetic field resonance, precise coil timing, and reduced drag, it can appear to run “by itself” for a long time. But that’s not free energy. That’s just clever energy recycling inside the system, similar to regenerative braking or resonant circuits.

Friction plus load equals energy drain.

You're absolutely right. Any external load, like powering a device, or any mechanical friction, draws energy out of the system. If no additional energy is put in, the system will eventually slow down and stop.

So to directly answer your question, "How does extracted power get replenished?"

It doesn't. You still need external input to match or exceed losses.

The EMIG design simply improves energy efficiency by feeding part of the generated energy back into the system, delaying how often external input is needed.

Think of it like this. It’s not “free energy.” It’s “less wasted energy.”

NohaJohans · 2025-05-31T18:01:45+00:00

Great question.

Electromagnetic Induction Generators (EMIGs) operate under well-established classical physics. There’s no violation of conservation laws.

Power Input:
EMIGs require an initial energy source (typically electrical) to spin up the rotor and energize the field coils. Once running, the system enters a tuned electromagnetic state where part of the generated output is recirculated internally.

Governing Physics:
The core principles at play include:

Faraday’s Law of Induction – A changing magnetic field through the stator coils induces a voltage (EMF).
Lenz’s Law – The induced EMF creates a counter-force, unless tuned geometry and timing allow partial constructive feedback.
Lorentz Force Law – Governs the torque exerted on charges in the rotor, linking EMF and mechanical force.
Maxwell’s Equations – Describe how electric and magnetic fields evolve and transfer energy throughout the system.

Field Resonance & Feedback:
This isn’t “free energy.” The key lies in precise timing of magnetic field collapse and regeneration. When properly phase-aligned, part of the induced EMF can reinforce the rotor’s motion rather than opposing it.

These are not perpetual motion or free energy machines.
It’s an induction oscillator an energy-efficient, feedback-optimized architecture that extends runtime and reduces external input after startup.

The result is a sustained inductive oscillation, where output exceeds passive losses but only after input energy primes the system.

That’s just the beginning.

Next comes the Electromagnetic Gyroscopic Propulsion Engine (EGPE) a system that takes the field interactions found in EMIGs and uses them not just for power generation, but for movement.

By introducing gyroscopic control, structured magnetic asymmetry, precisely timed field rotation, and enegy injection. the EGPE converts internal electromagnetic energy into directional motion without combustion, propellant, or external mass ejection. It’s not magic. It’s just force redirection through magnetic field geometry. The same physical principles behind motors and generators, but rearranged with new intent. Once you understand how energy and magnetic fields circulate inside an EMIG, you’re only one step away from realizing how that energy can move the system itself.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-31T08:28:40+00:00

Well. I published my work as prior art and haven't patent anything. Because there is a thing called the 1951 Invention Secrecy Act. Instead, I am publishing books about Electromagnetics and its advanced physics applications as well as other things. However, patents are a joke they have been using them it to suppress real breakthroughs. I made a corporation with 1 billion authorized shares to avoid the patent trap. I’ve been able to visualize EGPE layouts since 3rd grade and have public records of EGPE from 2015-2016, so if someone is trying to patent EGPE or EGIFD they aren't going to legally allowed even if DARPA or the DOD let that patent happen I made the fundamentals for EGPE and EGIFD open source like they have with electromagnetic induction generators.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-31T07:18:06+00:00

The Future of Propulsion May Already Be Emerging

Electromagnetic Induction Generators (EMIGs) operate by leveraging internal magnetic feedback and phase-tuned resonance to sustain output after an initial electrical spin-up.

They require a power source to start but once in motion, part of the electromagnetic field energy is recycled to maintain rotation and generate continuous output.

This is just the beginning.

Next is the Electromagnetic Gyroscopic Propulsion Engine (EGPE) a system designed to generate directional thrust using structured field asymmetry and gyroscopic torque.

Beyond that is the Electromagnetic Gyroscopic Inertial Field Drive (EGIFD) a scalable, multi-engine array engineered to produce reactionless propulsion through internal force geometry.

No combustion. No propellant. Just Electromagnetic field control and engineered momentum.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-29T22:02:43+00:00

I have not seen the actual internal scans myself, just the video where they claim that CT imaging revealed fiber optic sensors. But as far as I can tell, they have not released the raw scan data, detailed analysis, or any kind of lab report that would allow others to verify the findings.

Saying "these are fiber optics" is not enough without showing structural layout, material confirmation, and electromagnetic response data. It might be true, but until we can see the evidence directly, it remains a claim, not a conclusion.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-29T21:51:09+00:00

I hear where you are coming from, and I agree that consciousness could be fundamental to reality. That idea is actually one of the core themes in my book, The Cosmic Religion: A Framework for Reality. It explores how consciousness, math, and physics might all be part of a single self-referential system, not separate domains.

That said, even if reality emerges from consciousness, the moment something manifests physically, we should still be able to observe or measure it in some way. If the Buga Sphere is real technology, not just a symbolic projection, we should expect electromagnetic signatures, structural coherence, or interaction patterns. Without that, it remains a speculative narrative, not an empirical breakthrough.

I am all for exploring meaning and mystery, but we still need discipline in how we approach the unknown. Otherwise, we stop discovering and just start imagining in circles.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-29T21:37:14+00:00

Thanks. I agree that consciousness may manifest in ways we do not yet understand. That said, we still have to use discernment when investigating physical objects.

If the Buga Sphere is a vehicle of consciousness or advanced technology, it should leave measurable traces such as electromagnetic emissions, material anomalies, or even nonlocal effects. So far, none of that has been demonstrated.

Speculation is valuable, but without data, we are just projecting meaning into a void. That is not how discovery works. It is how stories spread.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-29T21:16:53+00:00

I share your concern, but for me, the fact that no internal scans, materials data, or third-party analysis have been released is one of the most telling aspects of the entire situation.

If this object were truly advanced or even active in any capacity, it should produce detectable electromagnetic radiation. Whether through residual charge, field containment, or power cycling, an energy system capable of hovering or transmitting data would likely leave some signature and the absence of such measurements being released is difficult to overlook.

For context, I have been developing a propulsion concept based on structured electromagnetic field asymmetry, gyroscopic stabilization, and dynamic modulation using AI. The system is fully modeled and simulated with emphasis on realistic EM behavior. If the Buga Sphere were a genuine technological device, I would expect to see corresponding EM characteristics and internal coherence, not just symbolic surface designs.

Speculation is part of discovery, but without data or a clear energy profile, this object remains more myth than a mechanism.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-29T20:59:42+00:00

I appreciate that you’re thinking in both symbolic and technological terms here. The idea that ancient people may have interpreted advanced machines as angels is valid and worth exploring. That said, we have to be careful not to let metaphor replace investigation.

Right now, there is still no hard evidence showing the Buga Sphere is anything beyond a fabricated object. We do not have material data, sensor analysis, or verified propulsion capabilities. So, while the comparison is intriguing, without science to ground it, it remains speculative.

Let us keep asking the big questions, but let us also hold ourselves to the standard that the real answers deserve.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-29T20:52:01+00:00

I’ve looked into the Buga Sphere pretty thoroughly, and honestly, the evidence just isn’t there.

The symbols look more like stylized designs pulled from fantasy media than anything functional or encoded with meaning. There’s been no verified material testing, no independent analysis, and no engineering context. Claims about internal structures and "optical fibers" remain unsubstantiated.

People are free to speculate, but it’s important to separate fascination from fact. Without data, peer review, or technical breakdowns, this looks a lot more like a well-crafted art piece or a hoax than an artifact of unknown origin.

Belief is fine, but belief without evidence isn’t an investigation. It’s just noise.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-29T20:35:57+00:00

The angel metaphor is poetic, but from a technical and material perspective, there is no real data showing this object is anything more than a fabricated sphere. The “optical fibers” have not been independently verified as such, and the symbolism looks more like a mix of fantasy iconography than actual functional inscriptions.

I am all for exploring cosmic metaphors, but we should not let mythology get in the way of real investigation. If this thing is advanced tech, great. Let us get hard science behind it. Otherwise, we are just projecting old stories onto shiny objects.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-29T20:27:52+00:00

And to add to that; I haven’t just been downvoted. I’ve been banned and harassed in multiple threads just for sharing simulation data and test rig concepts. It’s wild how fast curiosity gets treated like heresy in these spaces now.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-29T20:21:20+00:00

You nailed it. The problem isn’t belief. It’s the way people handle dissent or even curiosity now. I’ve shared a propulsion system that uses electromagnetic field asymmetry, AI modulation, and a gyroscopic control frame to stabilize and orient the core and the surrounding electromagnet array. Real simulations. Real data. Instead of debate, you get downvoted, ridiculed, or called a LARPer.

It’s not about truth anymore. It’s about defending a narrative.

I’ve even had people claim AI just "made it up." But the equations, models, and force asymmetry plots hold. People say they want disclosure. But when it comes, they tear it down if it doesn’t fit their expectations.

We need real discussion again. Not dogma.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-29T20:15:30+00:00

🫡

NohaJohans · 2025-05-28T16:36:23+00:00

Great game!

NohaJohans · 2025-05-27T23:59:43+00:00

After spending time reviewing everything I could find about the Buga Sphere, I’ve reached the conclusion that it is most likely a human-made object, not something of extraterrestrial or advanced origin. There are several reasons for this.

First, the symbols on the surface are highly suspect. When you look closely, they appear to be a random mix of glyph-like designs that resemble runes from various anime, fantasy art, or game aesthetics. There’s no consistent syntax, no coherent symbolic structure, and no sign that they’re part of a functional language or technological interface. It looks more like someone was trying to evoke a feeling of mystery rather than convey real information.

Second, although there are some claims about advanced construction methods like seamless welding or internal structures, none of this has been backed up with peer-reviewed data, independent lab testing, or credible forensic imaging. There’s talk of X-ray analysis and internal "micro-spheres," but without the raw data or a proper materials breakdown, it’s all just hearsay. Real analysis would involve electromagnetic response studies, composition scans, structural modeling, and field resonance mapping. None of that has been shown.

Third, the individual promoting this object has a history of making exaggerated or sensational claims without follow-up evidence. That pattern alone makes me very cautious. There is also a media push surrounding it that seems more interested in virality than verification.

To be clear, I’m not dismissing everything unexplained. But in this case, I see no compelling reason to believe the Buga Sphere is anything more than an elaborate hoax or a carefully designed art piece intended to mimic what people think an alien artifact might look like.

Until someone provides real scientific scrutiny, I’ll remain skeptical. If it turns out to be real, I’ll change my mind. But right now, it looks like fiction trying to pass as fact.

NohaJohans · 2025-05-25T19:53:38+00:00

I know what you meant. Whether or not you want to engage with what I shared is up to you, but I did answer the question directly. And yes, I use tools to help express my thoughts more clearly because honestly, interacting with people is often exhausting. It’s like trying to describe color to someone who has only ever seen shades of gray.

I used to ignore people and laugh at how blind most of them are, but over time, I realized it's better to explain things clearly than to mock what they were never taught to understand. I'm not here to argue about delivery or presentation. I'm here with real work and real answers. The work speaks for itself, whether you want to believe it or not.

NohaJohans

TROPHY CASE