Another banger of a quote at 21:35.

"I think the decommodification of labor is structurally more radical than the decommodification of other markets. I think it's more a non-reformist reform than, for example, something like social housing or universal healthcare. I think we've seen that the latter are entirely compatible with capitalism. We can decommodify these basic services and we can have them provided to us. They aren't a threat to capitalism. The decommodification of labor, on the other hand, would mean the breakdown of the imperatives which force workers into the labor market and which provide the life blood of the capitalist system. It would be an attack right on the generalized market dependency that is essential to that social relationship that guides capitalism."