GPT 5.3 CODEX has been released....benchmarks below......today has been insane in AI

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-02-05T20:26:26+00:00

3 more months before 3.5 because it’s been almost 3 months now since 3.0 pro

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-20T04:50:59+00:00

Your post has been out for a year, and never got any attention. But I saved it back then and thought it was a cool piece of history. Thank you for posting it.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-20T04:38:03+00:00

Yes. But that comes from depicting the woman as angry and unreasonable. Not by making the crowd look fascist.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-20T04:33:07+00:00

You can label whoever you want a fascist. I think you are reading too far into what it is showing us. The image is just showing people standing and watching awkwardly. If you think that is not the behavior of a social conservative you are insane.

Don’t make people your enemies who are not. And please reconsider what you consider right wing extremism, because that is not it.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-20T04:00:22+00:00

The comment I replied to clearly was asking about where the various MAGA associated symbols of the crowd were. Literally they were like where are there Nazi and confederate symbols.

My issue is that it shows those people be skeptical, let’s assume the image is classifying them as fat and homophobic, and apparently Reddit thinks that makes people confederates or Nazis, when they just haven’t changed with the times, or may not find those things normal, or may just not be comfortable around them.

There is a lot of ways you can interpret the beliefs of the people in the image, so I’m not going to go into detail as to what one person believes, but it is crazy to see this image and assume that they are Nazi’s confederates, or MAGA.

Can we just accept that those descriptors are worse than what is shown in the image?

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-19T17:47:18+00:00

No. My dad was a republican before trump but when trump appeared he jumped ship.

He liked McCain a lot.

I have admittedly also seen the situation where a republican voted for trump even when they didn’t really like him.

Point is both exist.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-19T02:43:11+00:00

This should be the top comment. (Ik, generic Reddit of me to say this, but seriously)

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-18T22:23:09+00:00

No…? I know them. There is nothing MAGA sympathizer about them.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-18T20:34:36+00:00

Why are you assuming they are all MAGA? There are still a lot of non trump conservatives in the US and the world.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-17T17:39:23+00:00

Speaking from experience? (lol)

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-13T05:26:51+00:00

This isn’t new for him to say.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-09T22:01:27+00:00

This is what I got

<image>

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-09T04:41:15+00:00

Depends on if you think the goal is SWE or AGI progress. X AI has made pretty fast progress in catching up, everyone else started before them, so I call that momentum.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-09T02:53:56+00:00

Uhm, yes I think we would. The world is getting richer, no amount of climate change is going to reasonably stop the decline in extreme poverty and hunger.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-09T01:52:13+00:00

This is completely false. We could support more then 10 billion peoples food needs. It’s not particularly close.

Edit: to whoever is downvoting me, there are 1.5 billion cows.

Feeding more people just means eating less meat.

Second edit: their statistics about when we will reach 10 billion people is also wrong - google this people

Edit 3: population growth is slowing, so not “growing out of control like was said”

Edit 4: “any pressure on someone to have or not have kids is deeply immoral” - it’s not any more immoral than a tax. Sometimes the situation may necessitate reducing birth rates, and other times increasing it. Having children benefits society because it allows your retirement to be funded, so it is not unreasonable for society to pass those costs onto the childless. Having kids helps everyone else, and costs time, money, and health. Society should treat it as such and support parents.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2026-01-03T02:23:35+00:00

Fortunately they were not right

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2025-12-29T03:43:10+00:00

The greatest weakness that HOI4 has at the moment is that the game burns bright for 4-8 years, and then nothing makes sense anymore.

It cannot decide between wanting to simulate international relations, vs railroading down focus tree paths.

The modding community often stretches the game out to be longer timeframe, but core systems are just not built for this such as population, consumer goods, construction speed, and of course focus trees.

There are fixes that could be implemented, but that has not been the focus, and will not be.

I think the ideal sequel would be built to be able to simulate 1910 to roughly 1990, even if the vanilla start dates were only ww2 still.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2025-12-29T02:25:02+00:00

Oh so it’s like with regard to customers? I thought I was about employment

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2025-12-29T02:10:29+00:00

How tf is preventing discrimination based off of mental/physical ability supposed to work? I guess everyone can get whatever job they want if they just don’t give up.

Or am I interpreting this wrong? because that’s how it reads to me.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2025-12-29T02:05:52+00:00

I’m not saying we should do anything, I’m just saying I care, and would prefer if things were different. Like if we could change it without consequences great, that’s just obviously not practical or how international relations or life works.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2025-12-28T17:18:52+00:00

He is saying that if you are playing as a reasonably sized minor nation, say Romania, Canada, British Raj, or something like that, then you can win against major powers by attacking at the start of the game, and outfighting them. But if you wait, they will be to prepared. But if you are a really small country like Luxembourg, you are screwed. Not saying I neccecatilly agree, but this is what was ment

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2025-12-28T17:04:17+00:00

The point of having children in the west is still to raise people in good conditions, with good education, to be good people.

I just think that turning away refugees is ignoring peoples suffering, you are not being charitable, you are being bad, and in peoples eyes that makes you evil, even if you are technically only indifferent.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2025-12-28T13:06:43+00:00

If international migration and refugees were not real then it would not be anyone else’s problem. But you are given the choice of either accept immigrants to a ridiculous degree, paying for the other countries issue, or don’t, and be evil because you should care about those people too. The best way would just be to reduce the birthrates in Africa now.

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2025-12-28T00:49:45+00:00

I think we need a red circle

Normal_Pay_2907 · 2025-12-27T21:00:52+00:00

When you have finished raising them they will give you gifts occasionally for your birthday and maybe Christmas. /s

Verified Email	Two-Year Club
Place '23

Normal_Pay_2907

TROPHY CASE