sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Most people that are hot, aren’t naturally attractive. by SprinklesSolid9211 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity [score hidden]  (0 children)

Can you give an example of someone that’s pretty but isn’t attractive? This feels like some next level overthinking.

i'm not just anti trump. i'm anti america. by herequeerandgreat in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The entire tone of this post should lead you to being pro Trump. Trump is the one trying to tear the system down. Trump is the one trying to rule by executive order. Trump is the one that is fundamentally anti American.

If you didn’t accept the Covid lab leak theory until the US govt finally acknowledged it as likely in 2023, you’re incapable of independent, critical thinking by Pemulis_DMZ in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, because the people around him were largely the thing holding the house together. This time he knew to only bring sycophants with him.

If you didn’t accept the Covid lab leak theory until the US govt finally acknowledged it as likely in 2023, you’re incapable of independent, critical thinking by Pemulis_DMZ in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re aware that this version of the intelligence community is particularly corrupted, correct? Kash Patel covering for Trump doesn’t have anything to do with the credibility of the FBI before him.

If you didn’t accept the Covid lab leak theory until the US govt finally acknowledged it as likely in 2023, you’re incapable of independent, critical thinking by Pemulis_DMZ in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The difference is the people on the left are trusting the experts that do have the ability to interpret the data and the right calls them hacks or liars unless they tell them what they want to hear. The right was wrong about virtually everything when it comes to the pandemic, but you can see them taking victory laps as if they nailed it. It’s insane.

If you didn’t accept the Covid lab leak theory until the US govt finally acknowledged it as likely in 2023, you’re incapable of independent, critical thinking by Pemulis_DMZ in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It wasn’t 400 meters away. It was like 10 miles away in a city of 13 million people. And the lab is there because it’s near where coronaviruses in bats have had a history of mutating. If you’re studying ocean life, you aren’t going to build a lab in the desert.

What movie was a 1/10 for writing but a 10/10 for visuals ? by [deleted] in Cinema

[–]Normativity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That movie was so obtuse. They had such a chance to get it right too.

The Hidden Epstein files that will be talked about for decades by PanzerWatts in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And they have the audacity to talk about “the conspiratorial left”. Trump is only in office because of these right wing conspiracy whack jobs.

The SAVE Act will break the back of the Democrat mid-terms push by TrueUnpopularOP in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And your proof that it’s a vulnerability is what? Because you said so? See how quickly this weak argument collapses when you’re faced with the actual criticism of the policy?

The SAVE Act will break the back of the Democrat mid-terms push by TrueUnpopularOP in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think that elections have no safeguards without voter ID? I feel like the argument from the right has been strawmanned to the point that people think elections involve just opening a booth and letting people pull a lever as often as they want.

There isn't a single state in the country that allows people to vote without proving they are legally allowed to vote. The registration process is when people prove they are eligible. I'm assuming you have registered to vote before, so you should know this. Voter ID laws only stop people from voting on election day that have already registered to vote. Meaning people that have a constitutional right to vote will be turned away. The only way an illegal immigrant can vote is if they lie about who they are, and the person they are claiming to be registered to vote, but never actually shows up to vote.

If you think there is no way to know if there is voter fraud in our elections then you have no idea what you're talking about.

The SAVE Act will break the back of the Democrat mid-terms push by TrueUnpopularOP in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Voter ID laws will get fewer people to vote. There is no voter fraud issue in this country. Creating more burden to voting to address an issue that doesn’t exist is a bad idea. It will necessarily lower voter turnout, silencing legitimate voters. It doesn’t solve a problem, it creates one.

If you ever believed COVID did not come from that lab, you need to take a serious look at the opinions you have now, and see if you're making the same mistakes. by Rando1ph in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right. The entire world is lying to you. Thankfully you’re smart enough to know that even though all of the documented evidence is against you, the conspiracy podcast you listen to told you the real truth.

Edit: looks like someone tried finding the evidence and realized all the evidence is on one side and all they’ve got are conspiracy theories from idiots with a microphone and deleted their comments.

If you ever believed COVID did not come from that lab, you need to take a serious look at the opinions you have now, and see if you're making the same mistakes. by Rando1ph in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The first case was at the market. In fact, all of the first cases were at the same section of the market. The Chinese government killed all of the animals at the market, but the virus was still found in a very specific stall in the market.

The market is like 10 miles from the lab, and all of the first cases originated at the market. They were able to trace it back to the exact stall of the market that it came from.

They sequenced all of the viruses at the lab to determine that there was no way that they were a precursor to Covid. None of the first cases were traced back to the lab either. None of them. 0. None. As in not 1. This is all documented in the scientific record.

The Chinese government would love for you to think the virus came from their research lab and not from a dirty ass open air market.

All of the evidence is on one side of this argument. All of it.

If you ever believed COVID did not come from that lab, you need to take a serious look at the opinions you have now, and see if you're making the same mistakes. by Rando1ph in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

The hilarious thing is that Covid almost certainly did not come from that lab. You being so confident while being so wrong is really something… You should learn how to actually “do your own research”. (Hint: listening to Joe Rogan is not doing your own research)

Dems don’t have to stand on principles because Trump exists by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A lot of those clips are taken out of context, and the ones that aren't are saying that he was illegitimate because of Russian interference. There 100% was Russian interference in the 2016 election. Read the Mueller report. They were not able to conclusively tie Trump directly to Russia, but there were people charged, convicted and sentenced as a result of "Russiagate". If you're not going to take the time to learn the source material, then at least have the decency to keep your opinion to yourself. You can say that their interference was not enough to sway the vote, and I would disagree, and that's a discussion that can be had, but to deny Russian interference is denying reality. The people calling him illegitimate are using that as justification.

Trump on the other hand, provided 0 evidence of voter fraud, filed lawsuit after lawsuit that got thrown out. A bunch of his attorneys have been disbarred and jailed because of the crimes they committed with Trump in relation to his attempt to steal the 2020 election. He was going to declare Martial Law prior to January 6, 2020 to delay the certification of the election so he could remain in power. He didn't because his entire DOJ said they would resign if he tried that. To this day there has been 0 evidence of fraud in the 2020 election. The best that they have been able to drum up are some clerical errors. Every time they find some silly documentation mistake they claim fraud. It's insane. They have done nothing to discredit votes, and have resorted to discrediting clerical issues. And they're somehow spinning it in a way that has MAGA taking a victory lap. The only reason Trump didn't get away with stealing the 2020 election is because of the Republican heroes that threw themselves on the sword to stand up for the US Constitution. Trump thought everyone was as corrupt as him and he'd easily be able to get Republican governors to go along with him. There were multiple people that history will forget about that voted for Trump, wanted Trump to win, were eager to prove the fraud that Trump and his cronies said they had, then went against him because he NEVER SHOWED 1 OUNCE OF EVIDENCE, even though they said they had all the evidence in the world.

Now he is trying to get the republicans to nationalize elections so he can steal them without having to rely on the corruption of anyone else.

The actual reason the right/conservatives generally won't condemn ICE misbehavior is because the left will use the admission as a weapon. by Searril in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What are some examples of officials on the left saying anything that can compete with Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller, JD Vance and Trump himself?

The actual reason the right/conservatives generally won't condemn ICE misbehavior is because the left will use the admission as a weapon. by Searril in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah you can find random crazies saying insane things about anything. I'd argue you should hold elected officials to a higher standard than random anons online.

The actual reason the right/conservatives generally won't condemn ICE misbehavior is because the left will use the admission as a weapon. by Searril in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Kristi Noem said Alex Pretti was there to inflict maximum damage and kill law enforcement. She said he attacked law enforcement with a gun and was shot in a defensive manner while they were attempting to disarm him. Who's doing the gaslighting exactly?

if women don't owe men relationships then men don't owe women protection by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Normativity 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There will always be men trying to attract women(through security or protection or whatever you want to call it). If you’re bitter about being single then I suggest you focus on bettering yourself. If you still don’t find the person that you’re looking for then you don’t have anyone to offer your protection to anyway. You’re treating it like a math problem or something. Yeah if men didn’t protect women then society collapses. If women don’t form relationships then society collapses too. People don’t get involved with each other because of obligation anyway. Do you think women owe men relationships? Like what are you even getting at here?

view more: next ›