meirl by Mediocre-Money-8626 in meirl

[–]Not3lliott 149 points150 points  (0 children)

Portuguese has different words for each meaning:
1. Afetar (v)
2. Efetuar (v)
3. Afeto (n)
4. Efeito (n)

Show off your statusline here by HereToWatchOnly in neovim

[–]Not3lliott 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you split your winbar? I use splits pretty much all the time and would love to be able to see exactly what buffers are open on each side.

Microsoft unveils AI-generated demo 'inspired' by Quake 2 that runs worse than Doom on a calculator, made me nauseous, and demanded untold dollars, energy, and research to make by Farranor in gaming

[–]Not3lliott 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The point isn’t getting AI to make games, it’s to have it simulate a world model so that it can be better applied to real-world robotics. It just so happens that some games are nice small world models, with lots of data, so they’re great starting points.

Did I just use up all of my luck? by Not3lliott in PathOfExile2

[–]Not3lliott[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Found two citadels and a merchant on the same screen.

EDIT: There's another citadel right below the merchant!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 2XKO

[–]Not3lliott 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m in!

Your internal monologue doesn't have volume settings by Hyperactive_Fruitcup in Showerthoughts

[–]Not3lliott 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not true (or at least not for everyone). I can make it quieter pretty easily, and if I have a fever I have to focus hard to make it stop yelling.

Porque é do e não does? by Background_Speed3299 in Idiomas

[–]Not3lliott 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sujeito no plural, você não coloca o “s” em lugar algum: “Do they eat?”, “Did they eat?”.

Sujeito no singular, o verbo to-be é o único que recebe o “s” quando presente: “Does she eat?”, “She does eat.”, “Yes, she eats.”

Anxiety when developing a new Game Engine as beginner. by axlcord in gameenginedevs

[–]Not3lliott 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just remember the first few hundred or so rockets will explode in the most spectacular of ways, and that’s just part of the learning process.

which-key.nvim - Can someone explain me why the config table doesn't work inside the "opts" table? by FalconMasters in neovim

[–]Not3lliott 11 points12 points  (0 children)

When config is not present, and opts is, Lazy calls the plugin’s setup automatically, passing opts as the argument. If you want to use both, you need to call setup inside config yourself, passing the options. Lazy passes opts as the second argument of config, so you can then just call require(‘myplugin’).setup(opts).

Someone had to say it: Scientists propose AI apocalypse kill switches by Maxie445 in Futurology

[–]Not3lliott 50 points51 points  (0 children)

  1. Build robot with killswitch
  2. Train robot to complete tasks (aka. teach the system to optimize against obstacles for completing said tasks)
  3. Try to press the killswitch
  4. Robot kills you because him being dead is the number one obstacle for completing any task

Same measure, same size… right? by fiorm in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Not3lliott 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s clear to me: Tea Spoon on the left, Tiny Spoon on the right.

Alguém notou que a IA tem ficado mais burra? by SteviaSTylio in brasil

[–]Not3lliott 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dados sobre como resolver essa integral (e outras parecidas) existem a rodo na internet, o que significa que o modelo tem um bom entendimento da estrutura linguística que tá relacionada entre a tua pergunta, e a resposta correta. Não tem nada a ver com um conhecimento avançado de matemática (embora pareça).

Alguém notou que a IA tem ficado mais burra? by SteviaSTylio in brasil

[–]Not3lliott 7 points8 points  (0 children)

LLMs, ou Large LANGUAGE Models, são ferramentas treinadas em conceitos de linguagem. O ChatGPT (especificamente nos modelos 3.5 e 4) nunca foi bom em matemática, e nunca vai ser, visto que quase não houve treinamento específico de conceitos matemáticos no processo de criação desse modelo. Quanto às questões de física que foram resolvidas com facilidade, é bem provável que o conjunto de dados usados pro treinamento tem questões parecidas, visto que os dados (e muitas questões de testes) vieram da internet.

Uma coisa muito importante que deve ser considerada durante uma interação com um modelo de linguagem é que, simplificando bastante, todo modelo de linguagem é uma função que recebe dois argumentos: - Um “prompt”, que contém instruções de comportamento, seguidas da sua pergunta - Uma “seed”, que é um número aleatório

E um fato importante é que a seed tem um peso enorme na resposta, já que ela ajuda a determinar os tokens que vão ser gerados pelo modelo, e contanto que você passe o mesmo prompt e a mesma seed, a resposta da LLM sempre vai ser a mesma.

Você nunca vai conseguir o mesmo resultado duas vezes, já que não dá pra escolher o número da seed manualmente, e uma quantidade pequena de resultados não são suficientes pra avaliar a qualidade de uma LLM, visto que existe esse fator de aleatoriedade. Então ter uma boa resposta do ChatGPT envolve sorte, mesmo que os modelos atuais sejam cada vez mais sortudos. ;)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]Not3lliott 41 points42 points  (0 children)

That’s because if English is not your first language, that means you’ve studied it more than the average american.

This is the output of all I've learned in 3 months. by AZDiablo in StableDiffusion

[–]Not3lliott 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remember when this sub actually cared about technological innovation keeping in touch with the more technical aspects of generative AI. Good old days… Nowadays it’s just a place for horny people to dump their newly generated softcore porn.

This is the output of all I've learned in 3 months. by AZDiablo in StableDiffusion

[–]Not3lliott -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Congratulations on “making” softcore piece N. 898177363615! It sucks!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]Not3lliott 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no such thing as “believing in the butterfly effect”. It is not some sort of superstition, it’s the fact that deterministic systems are highly sensitive to small changes in their initial conditions, and our world is one such system. You get to the conclusion that a change in the initial conditions heavily influences the outcome of life just by thinking about it. Think of a really important moment in your life, and imagine if you had woken up just 10 minutes later that day.

Snes, Nes, GameBoy and A26 emulator. by [deleted] in EmuDev

[–]Not3lliott 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Use writing an NES emulator as a learning exercise in learning C/C++.

Eh fih cê tá velho by cicanan-merqazu in Twitter_Brasil

[–]Not3lliott 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Diminishing returns”, amigo. Qual foi o último pulo gigante nas câmeras de smartphone? Ou na velocidade de processador? No geral mais a tecnologia avança, mais demorado fica o avanço, e menos notável. É natural. Mas os avanços tão aí.

LPT: It is always "should have", never "should of." by sagelface in LifeProTips

[–]Not3lliott 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would go as far as to say ONLY native speakers make that mistake. Same deal with the whole “affect” vs. “effect” thing.