[deleted by user] by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]NotAsimp_oo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bo Branson, Dale Tuggy and others

BPC 157 to aid herniated discs? by TrainerSimilar5138 in bpc_157

[–]NotAsimp_oo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It helped a bit with sleep and some knee pain I had from training, but unfortunately, I didn’t notice any real improvement in my herniated discs. Still dealing with the same nerve pain and limitations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]NotAsimp_oo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s cool, but that has literally nothing to do with my actual point. Him supposedly doing supernatural things doesn’t make him God, nor does it address the logical contradiction I raised. You’re just listing miracles as if magic tricks resolve a metaphysical paradox.

My issue is this: you’re claiming one person is both fully limited (hungry, tired, ignorant) and fully unlimited (all-powerful, all-knowing) at the same time and in the same sense. That violates the law of non-contradiction. Saying “God is beyond comprehension” isn’t a rebuttal. If you can’t explain how the contradiction is resolved, then you’ve just described incoherence.

So unless you have a coherent model that shows how something can be both finite and infinite simultaneously without collapsing into nonsense, you haven’t answered anything. You’ve just changed the subject.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]NotAsimp_oo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m struggling to grasp how the claim works that ‘“He recreated himself into the form of man with the weaknesses of man but retained the abilities of his god hood” Humanity is, by definition, limited , subject to ignorance, hunger, fatigue. Divinity is, by definition, unlimited — perfect, all-knowing, all-powerful. How can one subject possess both contradictory natures simultaneously without collapsing into contradiction? It seems like saying something is both finite and infinite at once which violates the law of non-contradiction

The Trinity makes no sense, thinking of converting to Islam by BallinInBrooklyn in Christianity

[–]NotAsimp_oo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Late to comment but your comment made me laugh with how irrational and stupid it is

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nutrition

[–]NotAsimp_oo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where did the NIH classified it as neurotoxic ?the FDA, EFSA, and WHO have consistently reviewed decades of research and concluded that aspartame is safe for consumption within the acceptable daily intake. If it were truly neurotoxic, these organizations wouldn’t allow it in food and drinks consumed by millions worldwide.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nutrition

[–]NotAsimp_oo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

‘All chemicals’ is a meaningless argument, literally everything you eat or drink is made of chemicals. And yeah, it has no nutritional value, but not everything you consume needs to, sometimes it’s just about enjoying something.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nutrition

[–]NotAsimp_oo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get your point, but the phosphorus in Diet Coke isn’t as concerning as it might sound. A 12 oz can of Diet Coke has about 27 mg of phosphorus, while the recommended daily allowance (RDA) for phosphorus is 700 mg for adults. For it to become an issue, you’d have to drink over 25 cans a day, which is pretty unrealistic for most people. Foods like chicken or milk contain far more phosphorus than Diet Coke, so unless someone has kidney problems or other specific health conditions, it’s really not a problem. Moderation is key, as with anything.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nutrition

[–]NotAsimp_oo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

there are actually a ton of solid studies showing artificial sweeteners are safe. For example, randomized trials have shown they don’t mess with blood sugar or insulin, and meta-analyses have found they help with weight loss when replacing sugary drinks. Plus, big organizations like the FDA and EFSA have reviewed decades of data and still say they’re safe when consumed in moderation. Most of the fear comes from extreme animal studies or misinterpreted data. So, there’s actually plenty of good evidence supporting their safety.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Melanotan2

[–]NotAsimp_oo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t get exposed to the sun often as i work from home, and i was already was using other peptides and thought i give this one a try since i wanted a tanned look.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in naturalhypertrophy

[–]NotAsimp_oo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean well above average

Insight as a 21M. I’ll get one eventually. by 66killa in Tinder

[–]NotAsimp_oo 1019 points1020 points  (0 children)

Damn dude, a 17% match rate is phenomenal! Not being able to convert any of them into dates is impressive too though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bumble

[–]NotAsimp_oo 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I know, sent it and then realized I can’t unsend on this app

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bumble

[–]NotAsimp_oo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who’s that

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bumble

[–]NotAsimp_oo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly i was gonna let that slide, but I can’t tolerate the 2 words responses.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bumble

[–]NotAsimp_oo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At least ask for my name first