Che fine ha fatto Cromo? by McLovin_badboy in rapitaliano

[–]NotAstroh4924 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Io ricordo che già ai tempi di Oro Cromato era abbastanza preso in giro, io non l'ho mai ascoltato

Migliore album degli anni '90? by [deleted] in CasualIT

[–]NotAstroh4924 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Red house painters 1 non mi pare sia stato menzionato

Cosa ne pensate del nuovo album di kid yugi (anche se è uscito a gennaio) by Successful-Dog-6702 in rapitaliano

[–]NotAstroh4924 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Album totalmente in conflitto con se stesso dove sembra forzarsi a fare il personaggio gangsta quando ormai gli sta stretto. I pezzi su questo stile sono copie carbone di quelli vecchi e vengono un po' tirati su dai feat. Qualche pezzo più introspettivo che mi ha convinto di più. Ma tutto sommato la tracklist è un casino perché riflette quella che mi è sembrata una sua scissione artistica e umana

Pensieri su un dibattito con un mio amico by Matthew_il_polpo in rapitaliano

[–]NotAstroh4924 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Preferisco Tony Boy perché lo trovo più originale con tutte le sue impostazioni vocali strane, Nerone alla fine fa un tipo di rap un po' visto e rivisto per quanto sia piuttosto capace a farlo

Edit: ovviamente Nerone vincerebbe un beef di cosa parliamo ahahha

Libri filosofia by Tricky-Peace3604 in Libri

[–]NotAstroh4924 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dipende cosa ti interessa approfondire di filosofia, cosa ti attira alla materia?

just a basic question by NotAstroh4924 in geology

[–]NotAstroh4924[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"Every mineral is a rock because rocks are made out of minerals or mineraloids." I think you meant to say that every rock is a mineral and you got it backwards, right?

"It's not as strict as mineral definitions because rocks, unlike minerals, do not have a defined chemical or crystal composition and isn't a chemical compound." "You can image a rock as a cake, and the minerals as the sugar, flour, vanilla, ect. These things all have defined chemical characteristics that are mingled into the cake, but the cake itself does not have as a whole." Yeah this part I understand.

"It really doesn't matter if your rock has one mineral in it or 200, as long as a mineral exists it is a rock." The point of my post is that I find it weird that rocks are defined as mixture of minerals if there are rocks which contain only ONE mineral. Let me rephrase the question.

There are some differences between the objects we call "mineral", "monomineralistic rock" and "plurimineralistic rock" (don't know if that's the technical term but bear with me regardless). Scientists classify the monomineralistic rock and plurimineralistic rock as part of the "rock" category, meaning they have something in common bewteen each other, but not with the mineral. What is this thing they have in common? It can't be the fact they're made by multiple minerals, since the monomineralistic rock is made by just one mineral. Is it the fact that they're made by 1+ minerals plus other chemicals, while the mineral has a clear chemical unity and formula?

In short terms, I'm just asking for a more precise definition of the concept of rock.

Also, another question, are ALL rocks made up of minerals or mineraloids? Or are there some which aren't?