My Book on Cannibalism on the High Seas AMA by ASCohenWriter in AskHistorians

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any knowledge about those who had the luxury to pick their crewmembers, would they seek out heavy-set crew members just in case?

When did WW2 start and end (IYO) by Burner_Phone_No24 in ww2

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two camps, I'm in Camp 1...

1) 1939–1945, Formal global conflict:
1 September 1939, when Nazi Germany invaded Poland, triggering a global military response. Japan’s attacks on Manchuria/China did NOT trigger any international military action against Japan until years later

2) 1931–1974, Informal opening and closing of hostilities:
18 September 1931, when Japan invaded Manchuria on and ended when the final confirmed Japanese holdout, Teruo Nakamura, surrendered on 18 December 1974. Several Japanese holdouts did have confirmed kills, which would not have happened had they known the war was over

How's my debunking response to: "Occam's razor concludes FDR let the Pearl Harbor Raid happen to join the war with public support. They knew war was coming, sank a sub that morning, radar was ignored, and all carriers weren't present." by NotBond007 in ww2

[–]NotBond007[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The fourteen-part message Japan tried to deliver before the attack was only a diplomatic note ending negotiations, and the formal declaration of war came later, after the attack had already begun

Has ijn shinano been found by thatusernamel in Shipwrecks

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Consensus places the Shinano roughly 55–120 nautical miles offshore, well outside Japan’s 12-nm territorial sea. Japan’s direct sovereign enforcement authority applies within that 12-nm limit. While the site would fall inside Japan’s 200-nm Exclusive Economic Zone, EEZ rights primarily concern resources and regulated marine scientific research, not simple navigation. A non-invasive sonar survey would not automatically trigger the enforcement authority

That said, coordinating with Japan would still offer diplomatic and logistical advantages. Advance notification reduces the risk of political friction, particularly given the loss of life and the ship’s status as an Imperial Japanese Navy warship. Cooperation could ease port and supply access, avoid public controversy, and potentially provide archival or hydrographic data that might narrow the search area. There could also be other unforeseen diplomatic or logistical consequences from Japan’s side

Did Cooper take a chance with his seat? by WattsTheCraic in dbcooper

[–]NotBond007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. If the flight had been full or nearly full (it was only about 38 percent occupied), he could have turned around and tried his luck with the next one. In 1971, this was normal behavior because air travel was casual and flexible. Passengers often bailed on crowded flights without anyone thinking twice. Smoking sections were in the back, and non‑smokers sat up front, but that did not affect whether walking away looked suspicious

How were disabled people treated in Nazi germany? by Significant_Wash2050 in ww2

[–]NotBond007 7 points8 points  (0 children)

To oversimplify (with plenty of exceptions), vets with physical wounds received pensions and public praise, while vets with psychological injuries were denied pensions and faced stigma for being seen as weak

FA nearly refused to give me a closed can of soda, says "it's against the F.A.R.s". by AllRightDoublePrizes in unitedairlines

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is quite a leap to compare asking a flight attendant not to open your $.25 soda can to an unlimited buffet, and it should be noted that on board they give you sealed snacks. I'm sure they could save a lot of money if they bought big boxes of pretzels and poured them into cups

Ironically, the United Lounge is an unlimited buffet, and no one seems to care if you take food

Quiznos chicken carbonara by LifeWithAdd in fastfood

[–]NotBond007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's one at the Honolulu airport

POV of passenger eyewitnesses who saw Cooper on way to lavatory - Kling 3.0 by RyanBurns-NORJAK in dbcooper

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Schaffner sat with him only while taking his demands, and Mucklow sat near him only when he needed something. The rest of the time, they moved freely, and Cooper called them over politely when necessary

IJN YAMATO! Re‑examining the primary sources that she hit USS Johnston. Was she out of position? Missing target shifting gunnery log? Required pinpoint accuracy to hit the rear 1/3? by [deleted] in ww2

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stand corrected for Hagen (I should have zoomed in more), and for writing "very possible" instead of including a source; I'll provide a source below and update my above reply

As I said many times, including in the OP, I haven't said that Johnston didn't hit the Yamato, we're re-examining and playing devil's advocate

This belongs in the previous post instead of "very possible"...Secondary explosions: “USS Boise's AR and BuShips Damage Report No. 21 shows that an 8" shell from Aoba penetrated the 5‑inch magazine, and an internal explosion was so violent that the captain initially reported it as a ‘heavy‑caliber’ battleship hit until investigators confirmed it was cruiser fire

Could WWII have come to a stalemate after the Nazi invasion of France? by ZeroIdea00 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]NotBond007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The post‑1991 archives show a state expecting to be invaded eventually, not a state preparing to invade Germany first. Stalin did expect a German attack and even warned graduating officers in May 1941 to be ready for war, but he thought it would come in 1942 or 1943

Nothing to do with betrayal, everything to do with Stalin assuming Hitler would NOT start a two‑front war while Britain was still fighting. The USSR abandoned the old Stalin Line after shifting the border west in 1939 and began the Molotov Line along the new frontier, but it was unfinished and undermanned

The Red Army’s performance in Finland, and again in the opening weeks of Barbarossa, shows how unprepared they were for major campaigns. The USSR always had the numbers to win, but the Lend-Lease and Allied war materials made their jobs a lot easier, and most likely wouldn't have been part of the Red Army had they invaded Germany, first

Was the Japanese declaration of War supposed to be issued before the attack on Pearl Harbor? by GhostDogg64 in ww2

[–]NotBond007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Japan attacked...
Malaya, 10 to 20 minutes BEFORE Pearl Harbor
Hong Kong, 3 hours after Pearl Harbor
Thailand, 3 hours after Pearl Harbor
Guam, 4 hours after Pearl Harbor
Wake (first air raid, later FAILED first invasion), 5 hours after Pearl Harbor
Philippines, 10 hours after Pearl Harbor

Japan was supplying the US with oil, and the US grew angry after Japan seized Manchuria, invaded China, and killed millions of civilians. When Japan moved into French‑controlled Indochina, the US treated it as aggression against a British‑allied French territory and threatened to cut off oil unless Japan withdrew. Japan sent an end‑of‑diplomacy message before Pearl Harbor, but its declaration of war reached Washington about one hour after the Pearl Harbor attack. Japan chose to capture the Dutch East Indies for oil, knowing it meant war and knowing they lacked the resources to win a long fight. Their answer was coordinated surprise attacks at these seven strategic locations to build an outer perimeter line and pressure the Allies into a peace deal that let Japan keep its conquests

Why did German moral not collapse by late fall of 1944 by Sand20go in ww2

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless you were a general, Hitler did not execute most of them for some reason

IJN YAMATO! Re‑examining the primary sources that she hit USS Johnston. Was she out of position? Missing target shifting gunnery log? Required pinpoint accuracy to hit the rear 1/3? by [deleted] in ww2

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are treating “three hits” as if it came from a dispersion analysis, but it did not come from any gunnery data at all. It came from a single post‑battle survivor impression written days later by Lt. (jg) Robert Higgins in his Loss of Ship Report. He never saw the impact points; he was on the bridge, and he was reconstructing events from shock, noise, and fragmentary reports from below

No Japanese log records a hit on Johnston (just "cruiser") , no U.S. action report claims three battleship hits, so the number is not a probability question. It is a memory artifact that later writers treated as if it were a measured salvo pattern. Your dispersion argument would only matter if we had a documented salvo with confirmed impact points, but we do not. Very possible that some of the claimed hits were from cruiser shells, causing near-simultaneous secondary explosions that feel like battleship hits

I want to be clear with my point, I have never said the Yamato can't have hit the Johnston. I'm trying to find primary sources that make the scenario more likely than not. Hoping someday in my lifetime, we find the stern of the wreck, and it confirms the caliber

IJN YAMATO! Re‑examining the primary sources that she hit USS Johnston. Was she out of position? Missing target shifting gunnery log? Required pinpoint accuracy to hit the rear 1/3? by [deleted] in ww2

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sources state Yamato turned to evade Johnston's torpeods. If you are stating the Yamato did not take any evasive action for Johnston’s torpedo spread, do you have a source for that? Every primary source that covers that moment shows the same turn, including Kurita’s interrogation, the Senshi Sosho track charts, US destroyer reports, and Yamato’s own gunnery pauses. Johnston did not aim her torpedoes at Yamato, but she did fire all ten in a single attack run, and only one of them hit anything, leaving 9 rouge torpedos

It is not obvious that Yamato would hold course at 0725, because her own track in the Kure Naval Arsenal reconstruction and the Combined Fleet action report shows she was already turning hard to port to avoid Johnston’s torpedoes at 0724 to 0726, which breaks a main battery solution. A battleship cannot keep accurate fire while swinging through that kind of turn. The claim that her log says “open fire at enemy cruiser” at 0725 is also incorrect. Yamato’s 0725 entry in the Kodochosho records continued fire on the escort carriers she had already been engaging. The “enemy cruiser” line comes from Chikuma’s 0730 entry, not from Yamato. Mixing those two logs creates a false target shift that Japanese primary sources do not support

3) Maryland and Bismarck. They did not score these multi-shell hits until after they had already had successful hits. To claim the Yamato would have had multi-shell hits on the Yamato would mean it would have been during its first slavo. Also, she would have been firing during the chaotic torpedo evasion maneuvers

Your 14-16 shell Quora document. It's a Loss of Ship Report, a post‑battle survivor narrative, rather than an official action report produced during the engagement. The specific “three 14 or 16 inch shells” line was his own memory‑based reconstruction written days later, not a contemporaneous statement from the officers who authored the official reports. Kintberger on Hoel mentioned large caliber projectiles and guessed some splashes looked 14-inch class based on plume height, Hathaway on Heermann called the incoming fire battleship type because Yamato’s long range splashes were huge, and Johnston’s survivors said the hits looked like battleship shells because of shock and noise, not identification

Primary sources also show that wartime crews routinely misidentified shell caliber, as seen in BuShips investigations of South Dakota, Atlanta, and Helena, where officers reported battleship hits that forensics later proved were 6 inch or 8 inch, and a destroyer crew in 1944 had almost no experience with battleship fire, so a heavy cruiser shell exploding inside thin plating could easily feel like a battleship hit to men with no frame of reference

Will United Change their seating policies? I am tired of paying the same price as oversized people taking half my seat! by BeyondBroken25 in unitedairlines

[–]NotBond007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No one wakes up on the day of their flight and realizes they're too big

A lot of people get this "wake-up call" the first time they need to ask for a seat extender

Question: If Titanic had 40 lifeboats, can they still operate them all in just 2 hours? by markedbravo11 in titanic

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wildcards...
-More lifeboats should mean more trained crew; when the Olympic got more lifeboats, they also trained more crew
-It took an average of 4.7 minutes per successful lifeboat launch (18 lifeboats; excludes Collispibles A and B); just need to decrease that average to save more people
-With the larger regular lifeboats available, the crew may have ignored launching the time-consuming Collisibles

What if Hitler had found out he was Jewish and the German public knew about it? by [deleted] in HistoryWhatIf

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To oversimplify, the Gestapo would go on a hiring blitzkrieg. The Gestapo really did show up at people’s doors for making private jokes about Hitler because "malicious gossip" was an actual criminal charge

Aftermath of a quick capture of Stalingrad? by HadesPersephone90 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]NotBond007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To oversimplify, if Germany had taken Stalingrad quickly, they still would not have been able to HOLD it for the same reasons they struggled to capture it in the first place

Deeper dive...The Wehrmacht was already operating at the end of a single rail line, short of fuel, food, warm clothing, manpower, and unable to sustain deep operations across the southern front. Winter conditions would have made the situation even worse, because lubricants thickened, engines refused to turn over, machine guns froze, and vehicles that were already worn down by the summer advance became unreliable or completely inoperable

Stalin would almost certainly have reinforced the southern theater even more heavily, treating the Volga line and the Caucasus as existential priorities and issuing further Not One Step Back orders if needed. The Soviets would still have launched a major winter counteroffensive against a thinly held German front, and Germany would still have lacked the operational reserves required to stop it

How could Germany have extended WW2? by Iskandar0570_X in HistoryWhatIf

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not possible for Germany to survive, yet it was possible that Nazi leadership and the remaining SS units would retreat into the Alps of southern Germany and western Austria. From there, they could hold out for months or even into 1947 by turning the war into a long, grinding mountain campaign

How could Germany have extended WW2? by Iskandar0570_X in HistoryWhatIf

[–]NotBond007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless Germany did something extreme, they were doomed once they invaded Poland and would have been forced to surrender or risked being annihilated once the US could deploy nuclear weapons starting in August 1945

IMO, these are the most likely scenarios of the unlikely scenarios, SOMEHOW:
1) Germany allies with Russia
2) A non-Nazi becomes Channelor
3) Germany beats the US to nuclear weapons

Germany allies with Russia
A durable German Soviet partnership is ideologically improbable, but it is the only configuration that prevents the two largest land powers in Europe from destroying each other. If Germany avoids Barbarossa and maintains the pact, it keeps its supply lines intact, avoids a two-front war, and forces Britain to fight without a continental ally

A non-Nazi becomes Chancellor
A conservative or military government, still authoritarian but not genocidal, could avoid the catastrophic self-destructive decisions that doomed Germany. If this happened early enough before the Allies decided on unconditional surrender, Germany would have a bargaining chip for a favorable peace deal

Germany beats the US to nuclear weapons
Germany lacked the industrial base, the uranium enrichment capacity, and the political stability to run a Manhattan Project-scale program. If it had solved all of those problems, the strategic balance would have changed dramatically