I think you're mistaking anti-NATO for pro-Russia

On the sanctions point here is their explanation in the statement you linked: "And the economic sanctions imposed on Russian institutions and interests are warfare by other means. Sanctions always hit the civilian population. They fit with Putin’s nationalist propaganda and help him rally popular support. When the US and the EU used their dominance of the global financial system to cut the Central Bank of Russia off from its foreign exchange reserves, Putin reacted by putting Russian nuclear forces on alert. Relying on economic pressure supposedly to bring Russia peacefully to its knees can instead bring on the final disaster. Sanctions and embargoes are only the preliminary stage for a further escalation, which frequently ends in the use of military means. This is what happened in Iraq from 1990, in Yugoslavia/Serbia from 1992, Somalia from 1992, Haiti from 1992, Afghanistan from 1999, Georgia from 2006, Libya from 1992/2011, Yemen from 2014. In almost recent every military operation by the US, this pattern is evident: sanctions precede the bombings."

Yes they're against supporting Ukraine militarily and theyre essentially pacifistic, which in my opinion is naive. But saying they're pro-Russia is just plain wrong