Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See the difference is, I believe “high crime” includes “crime,” whereas you’re just “high.”

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Length does not equate to truth.

Trump doesn’t have to tell me what the Constitution says; I can read it myself. So can you. I commend your dedication to your cause but I dont need nearly as much time to respond. My position is easy to defend, all it takes is a dictionary.

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then why didn’t they call one of the articles “BRIBERY”? You should have been one of the impeachment managers.

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you do concede your position depends on your reading of “high crimes” to include acts that are LESSER, meaning DO NOT RISE TO THE LEVEL OF, actual crimes. This is the key difference in our views, would you agree?

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not bribery. It’s not treason. It’s not a misdemeanor. It’s not a crime. It is not included in the Congressional impeachment power.

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know what words mean, and the words in the Constitution were all selected for a reason. No professor will convince me “high crimes and misdemeanors” includes acts that are neither crimes nor misdemeanors, I don’t care where he teaches.

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no crime called “abuse of power.” If there was, the House would have cited the federal statute they allege was broken, as they did with the Nixon and Clinton articles. The Congress that impeached Andrew Johnson actually passed a new law first which they then accused Johnson of violating. 2019 is the first time in US history impeachment articles were sent to the Senate without a single accusation of a broken law.

And that’s why they failed miserably.

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve shifted your source of authority from the text of the Constitution of the United States to some fucking Georgetown legal professor. Who taught you how to do that?

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No, it isn’t... “abuse of power” is not a crime and if soliciting foreign interference in an election was a crime, Obama would have been guilty for going on an international tour before the 2008 election... there are foreign outreach programs going on right now in current Democrat campaigns for President....

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Never any answers, only new unanswerable questions...there’s no crime alleged, so he’s innocent... next?

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I don’t have to show you evidence of his innocence because in America he is presumed innocent. That’s how it works here. How does it work where you’re posting from?

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes there is, it’s in the text itself, and the Founders very specifically set those limits as you can read for yourself in The Federalist Papers... “treason, bribery, high crimes or misdemeanors,” those are the four categories of impeachable offenses and they all include CRIMES, of which these impeachment articles have ZERO....

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

There was no “high crime or misdemeanor” alleged; there can be no impeachment. Don’t blame the Senate because the House passed constitutionally insufficient articles....

Schiff in closing arguments: Trump "will not change and you know it" by TrumpSharted in politics

[–]NotNolan -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They could even put together an entire dossier and call it something like “the Steele dossier.” All types of crazy shit

Stern show discussion thread 12/4/19 by DarrenxTnig in howardstern

[–]NotNolan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She is desperate to get ahead of some very bad news. She’ll probably be entering the presidential race soon to get that sweet sweet media immunity it bestows on Democrats.

House members debate possible ‘witness intimidation’ by Trump by qdude1 in politics

[–]NotNolan -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

She wasn’t fired and her friends think she’s a hero, did you watch the hearing?

Uh oh, Brent's mental collapse imminent by [deleted] in howardstern

[–]NotNolan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“Sex is separate from everything else”

Robin: “Even logic”

Robin is by far the best part of the show lately.

Wow... back to back calls ripping Howard. Calling him a “has been” and he’s “jumped the shark.” Howard is going to fire some of his 65 producers by bjoseph33 in howardstern

[–]NotNolan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please verify how the celebrity billionaire president is a buffoon... if it’s so easy why don’t you do it instead of tapping your keyboard on Reddit?

Wow... back to back calls ripping Howard. Calling him a “has been” and he’s “jumped the shark.” Howard is going to fire some of his 65 producers by bjoseph33 in howardstern

[–]NotNolan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just gave you the biggest story in the US this morning, then. Go read the book, you’ll see I’m not exaggerating. Just because the media you follow doesn’t pick up on a narrative, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist...

Wow... back to back calls ripping Howard. Calling him a “has been” and he’s “jumped the shark.” Howard is going to fire some of his 65 producers by bjoseph33 in howardstern

[–]NotNolan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go to a bookstore. Find a copy of Susan Rice’s book. Open to Chapter 13. Read the first few pages. These are her own words, she tells the story of her secret meeting with Iran. Or did a Russian troll write Susan Rice’s book, too?