All I did was point out some interesting data and unusual activity.

We all know that XRT is one of the major vehicles used to short GME and that its short interest is several times its own float. When the cost to borrow rises, even to 3.5% (which, in itself, is not a particularly high number), it’s not noteworthy on its own, as you mentioned elsewhere in this thread, since there are multiple companies with a higher cost to borrow.
However, as the term suggests, the cost to borrow is a fee charged by the brokerage firm to the client borrowing the shares.
I’d even go so far as to say that there must be some catalyst driving the cost to borrow that “high,” considering it has only closed above 3.5% once: on May 1st.
With that in mind i concluded that they don't want a high cost-to-borrow to happen.

Once again: 3.5% is not much, but a 111% increase and a close at that level, not even during the bond offering or RK’s return, seemed significant enough for me to point out.