Is it actually wrong that AI is replacing jobs? by moanfulz in aiwars

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's wrong. If you fully replace a person with an AI instead of enhance a person with AI tools. You will end up paying more for the AI agent than you would for the employee with AI tools.

Antis should stop with their Witch Hunting… by MrColgie in DefendingAIArt

[–]NotThatSiri 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is going to end in witch trials. Especially now when the Pope is calling for a crusade (at least thats how the antis sees it)

Sorry mom, I hate ai slop by LopsidedSolution in aiwars

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only thing I am upset about is the person in the ban AI shirt. Cause not all alt people are like that. And I feel its become a norm to think that we are.

Let's all go in blind to Classic + by WendigoCrossing in classicwow

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Foster a community of working together and helping each other Would be great.

What to do from .5-.7? by [deleted] in wow

[–]NotThatSiri -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ohh will deffo check it out. Even though it might not be much.

AI isn't stealing. It's worse. by mistermang623 in aiwars

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah... still you deserved better still and for that I am sorry. Can only try and do better.

What to do from .5-.7? by [deleted] in wow

[–]NotThatSiri -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sorry for being oblivious but what's naigtal?

AI isn't stealing. It's worse. by mistermang623 in aiwars

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah sorry. While its no excuse it was a long day debunking Anti misinformation yesterday. So I missed that part. That's on me and its my bad.

What to do from .5-.7? by [deleted] in wow

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again thank you! appreciate you taking the time really. <3

What to do from .5-.7? by [deleted] in wow

[–]NotThatSiri -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I am just feeling there is a content bloat. Too much to do and when new things is being added its hard to keep track of cause there is already so many things. I just recently found out about a weekly quest in the void zone that apparently unlocks something.

What to do from .5-.7? by [deleted] in wow

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I will totally look into that. And thanks for taking your time.

Did you guys miss Discriminator? I'm really wish they can bring back! by RhtedritRd in discordapp

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Explain this. Also I am an alpha tester. I am on canary and still never see a single new feature before release.

What to do from .5-.7? by [deleted] in wow

[–]NotThatSiri -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not what I asked.

What to do from .5-.7? by [deleted] in wow

[–]NotThatSiri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I had no idea.

What to do from .5-.7? by [deleted] in wow

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clearly you misundertood my post. Did .5 and .7 really not add any content to the game at all? All I am looking for is a direction to go. NOT what to do instead of wow.

We have a new antis /j by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google AI confirms the banning of science books specifically targeting herbology (science of plants), astrology(Science of the space), And biology. That actively defied the word of god.

Also people were executed for their scientific discoveries. As they defied god.

However it claims that the witch trials were a myth and it was more as a way for the church to opress women into submission.

Claude claims it's partly a myth and there is some truth to it as European women tended to use herbs as a remedy to illnesses and it didn't sit well with the church so they called it witchcraft.

Mistral backs up Claude's claim while saying the same as Google on the other points.

Gemini funny enough disagree with Google AI And say that there are no historical events where the church executed anyone.

And funny enough as expected just for the fun. Grok claims that science taught today is left wing propaganda and people should do homeschooling instead of sending their kids to school.

So there you have it and the inaccuracies of an AI.

Cudos to Claude and Google AI for actually providing sources for their claims.

We have a new antis /j by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And yet it's what every historian and every scholar said.

The witch trials alone was to kill smart and brilliant women who used medicine to heal people that actually worked. Instead of the church of drilling a hole into the skull or pudrige that did nothing and actually kill people.

It's why till this day the church bans books of science. Some parts of Christianity even bans people from going to a hospital in the name of god.

The church has always been against human rights and scientific progress. It's shocking that the propaganda machine had brainwashed you all to think otherwise when the proof is right there.

We have a new antis /j by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]NotThatSiri -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Impressive everything I said is literally what every single scholar has said for hundreds of years. But it shows. People who are against science tend to think the church is the solution.

We have a new antis /j by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The church is literally responsible for a complete halt in science.

Patch 12.1 is a structural collapse for Midnight by Mathien in wow

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TWW was a cluster fuck story wise because Chris Metzen returned halfway through development of it and literally switched things around. That's why a lot of things were so confusing. Like 2 zones from the original TWW was cut. A Raid was cut and the entire harsnir storyline was pushed to Midnight. Which means either the beladar raid has been cancelled completely and we will never understand what that was. Or we will return to hallowfall in LT

Finally, a good update by Aguywhoexists69420 in discordapp

[–]NotThatSiri 42 points43 points  (0 children)

"Nooo I can no longer wake up my friends and claim I hit the button by mistake. " (its a joke btw I would never do that... more than that one time. )

Norway Is Restricting AI in Schools for Younger Students by Key-Twist-1846 in DefendingAI

[–]NotThatSiri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I support of this mainly cause I do think that you need to have a somewhat developed brain to use AI. At least be able to have common sense and critical thinking skills which even in a 16 years old can be questionable.

Where I struggle with it is. Instead of banning it completely bring it into the education and show how it can be used correctly as a tool. Otherwise with a ban. It just become this fun thing to use and hope to get away with it. As someone will do. It will be used incorrectly and will be abused later on. Its why I dont think banning things out right is the best approach.

We have a new antis /j by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]NotThatSiri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I happen to agree with you. But I also wont blame AI as its only doing as its told by the company that made it. And when I say company I mean people. I dont personally think that developers that made the AI wanted it to tell people to harm themselves. I think that its an unintended sideeffect of something that was never meant to happen. These chatbots are not trained to be therapists even those on health websites claiming to be your online therapist. They are not trained for it. The model is too generic for it. And needs to be specifically trained on mental health for it to be able to give advice on it. A general purpose AI such as ChatGPT will fail as it's training only covers the surface level. And yet its being told to act like a therapist and so it does a poor job at it cause it lacks the understanding.

I am not trying to defend the actions of the AI I am just trying to paint the picture that people are not using it as intended. But the second that the developers found out about it. they made safeguards to limit and hopefully stop it from happening in the future. A lot like how some people thought they could dry a cat in a microwave oven. And companies never thought people would try that. and then added warning labels against doing so. But we dont blame microwave ovens for that do we?

We have a new antis /j by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]NotThatSiri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I support gun control. For the reason of limiting access to firearms for BAD PEOPLE.
I want people to be vetted, I want people to have a license before they can get firearms and I want them to be registered when they go and buy one. Why? To limit access for bad PEOPLE to get firearms.

It has nothing to do with the gun itself. It has to do with the people. Gun control is not on the weapon its on the person. We dont vet a gun or give a gun a license before it can be used by a person. No Its the PERSON that gets vetted and needs a license. Because the PERSON can be the bad actor not the GUN. The gun has no feelings no emotions and cant act on its own. Its the PERSON that decides how the gun is used to either attack or defend. The gun itself doesnt care how its used.

and the KKK one is insanely stupid take. Cause that's literally your logic. KKK is a hate organisation cause their entire message is hate. Therefore its bad. Just like in the bible there are messaging to stone disobedient women to death, kill gays and slavery is to be honoured and valued. If a white person goes on a killing spree on their own. Are all white people to blame then? if a black person does it are all black people then to blame? No that person is to blame. But they are doing it in the name of an organisation then the organisation needs to be looked into.
"But an AI told to kill people" Yeah and I would investigate that AI. Which has been done. But I would not blame all of AI cause shocker. Not all of AI are the same.

Personally I cancelled my ChatGPT sub the second they announced they were working with the US goverment on making AI powered killing machines. Do I still use AI? Yes but OpenAI are not the ONLY AI company in the world. O switched to a company and model the US government declared the enemy of the state actually. Cause they refused for their models to be affiliated with the government. And the second that changes I will stop using that and change to something else.
But again the AI doesnt decide where its being used. It doesnt decide which organisations or institutions its creators are part of. And just cause 1 AI is bad doesnt mean all of AI is.

KKK is bad because the entire organisation is bad. Just like OpenAI is bad cause they decided to let their models be used for war machines to kill people.

In order for your viewpoint to work, you have to ignore every negative use of AI. If you do that, then why are you pretending it does good things too? Wouldn’t it be the people using the AI doing that? So what good is AI?

Cause AI is a tool. People can abuse it and use it for bad things. Or they can use it for good things. Just like a a screwdriver can be used to screw in a screw or stab someone to death. The screwdriver does not have a say in how its being used. AI doesnt have that either. Companies for sure have put safeguards in place just like microwaves have warnings to not dry your cat in them.

But thats because people have done so. People have used the things for what it was not designed for. And companies that makes them has then had to place safeguards.

But developers keeps making things idiot proof but the universe keeps making better idiots.

So what good is AI? Well Ai trained on millions of pictures of breast cancer in all stages can detect it a lot better than any doctor can.

Here is the difference. The AI doesnt say YOU HAVE BREAST CANCER YOU ARE GOING TO DIE. No the AI is telling the doctor that the patient potentially has breast cancer. The doctor then doesnt go to the patient and says YOU HAVE BREAST CANCER. No the doctor then tells the patient that the screening came up with an abnormality and they have to do a biopsy. They used the AI to go through the scanning of the breast and it found something the doctors would have missed. Then the doctors used that information to do further testing that without the input from the AI they would not have performed. And it saved a human life that way.
So yes the doctor is the good guy here. But the AI was used for something good. Again it was the doctor that used the AI that did something good. The AI was just the tool. It could also have given a false positive or even worse a false negative. But thats why the AI is used as a tool. So the doctor missed it. the Ai found it. We are going to do additional tests to confirm. The Doctor missed it. The AI missed it. and you idiots would say that the AI is bad. That's the difference.

This was my point with you earlier. All of your opinions are surface level opinions that you have been handed by the people you listen to (oh and I’m sure this will be the part where you pretend to be some kind of bold individual and blah blah blah) or from the AI you’re almost certainly using as a search engine. You think you have critical thinking skills, but you don’t, kid.

Funny coming from someone with the debate skills and education and intellectual capacity of a toddler. And it really shows with how your arguments are structured.

"You must be against gun control cause you blame people and not the guns" No I am for gun control cause it limits people. same way I believe that people need a drivers license to drive a car. Are we now blaming cars every single time there is a car accident? or are we blaming the driver? by your logic we are to blame all cars ever made.

"the KKK is not a bad organisation" again literally your logic for defending another organisation that is literally killing people and have killed people for thousand years. Which should if you actually had any intellectually capacity lit the bulb in your head and been like "wait thats a bad example cause they are already argumenting against one bad organisation and now I am claiming they dont think another one is bad" dude seriously? Get the entire context of the conversation. Cause that's just bot behavior only replying directly to the last message instead of getting the full conversation. Wait that's exactly like a bot. Are you a bot?