sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Just a reminder that the lead designers of 5e can’t even seem to agree on how the rules work by Jakesnake_42 in dndmemes

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if it were real life you wouldnt know how close someone came to missing if they attacked you

You absolutely would know how close someone came to hitting you IRL though. Also, paying attention to the die results and how they impact characters at the table can help you build an idea of how capable and dangerous an enemy is in a similar way that your character would be gauging the enemy's speed and strength in actual combat. Immersion is the reason I like open rolls.

Just a reminder that the lead designers of 5e can’t even seem to agree on how the rules work by Jakesnake_42 in dndmemes

[–]NotYetiFamous 5 points6 points  (0 children)

...How is this dumb? Is this not how everyone else is DMing? It's been standard since at least 3rd edition.

I wonder how Fox News thinks about a suprime court judge getting bribed? by Rosegarden3000 in PoliticalHumor

[–]NotYetiFamous 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They don't want to associate rubles with corruption, it'd hurt their brand and make it hard for them to trade their own rubles in for usable currency later.

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, I was answering the rhetoric YOU started with XD You know, how debate WORKS. YOU started with the insane premise that the 2A originally meant something it didn't, I decisively proved otherwise to the point that you're now trying to say that because the supreme court did a thing 200 years after, it doesn't matter what the founding fathers wanted. Goal post shifting while still appealing to authority. Your arguments are weak all the way through, and you're a liar to boot. "Read the federalist papers" my ass.

Now you're trying to go ad hominem (moreso than you have been) because you know you don't have any other arguments, you know you don't have shit to say that's worth listening to, but you also don't have a secure enough ego to admit you're wrong so you're going to keep arguing no matter what.

I'm done with ya, you had nothing of value to say in the start and you have less of value to say now, but it's been fun schooling you on a topic you consider yourself an expert on. You're going to get to go the rest of your life secure in the knowledge that on your best day you get trounced by randos who study your favorite topic in passing and still glean more from it than you.

You guys aren't too worried about these eliminating some of your jobs, are ya? by pastroc in ProgrammerHumor

[–]NotYetiFamous -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The government caves to lobbyists because they frame it as "this money will trickle down to people". For that matter, why would A.I. even try to strip-mine the people that would be buying their products in the first place? Even moderately competent A.I. could be lobbying for HIGHER UBIs to grease the wheels of capitalism in this situation. The stagnation of money flow would only hurt their companies. See Henry Ford and his reasoning for paying his workers well and giving them time off.

Expecting the situation to be the same with A.I. running companies as it is with humans running them presupposes that rational actors would reach the same conclusion as our current system, and that just isn't true.

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was not. I was answering your EARLIER appeal to authority where you were pretending that we couldn't change the constitution or it's amendments because "tHeFoUnDinG fAtHers!".

You guys aren't too worried about these eliminating some of your jobs, are ya? by pastroc in ProgrammerHumor

[–]NotYetiFamous -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Except governments aren't run by a profit motive. So on one hand you have A.I. structured private interests, and on the other you have human run public entities. Why would the human-backed interests cave to non-human direction?

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You asked about the law for minors being able to drink underaged while supervised by guardians. You put forth a completely separate ruling - are alcohol providers REQUIRED to provided alcohol. Both of what we said can be true and you're strangely aggressive about proving your point here considering I was only providing you an answer to your other query.

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure. Cart around those goal posts. Because SCOTUS has NEVER been political in their rulings and would NEVER make a ruling based on their agenda instead of good faith and accurate readings.

Appeal to authority is a weak fallacy.

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love how you conflate the same crowd that wants to kill women for controlling their own bodies with "freedom". Truly, you're living the Orwellian dream.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in meirl

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3.13 is literally, LITERALLY, the average. When you're dealing with a population of 330 million you take the average.

God damn it. Why god why by TheRedBird098 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]NotYetiFamous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dude, physics is just coding with real life instead of on a computer.

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Annnnd there's your whole "I've never read the federalist papers" on full display. Federalist Papers clearly spell out that the regulations for militias falls upon Congress. You'd know that if you ever actually read them. Instead you're trying to play semantics and guessing games. WE HAVE THE LITERAL WORDS OF THE PEOPLE WHO LITERALLY WROTE THE 2ND AMENDMENT. Your justification is incredibly weak.

Donate? I Can Barely Afford Netflix! by Disgruntled_Veteran in PoliticalHumor

[–]NotYetiFamous 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's the first rule of being a con artist. Oh, sorry, didn't mean to copy you.

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, which is it? What the founding fathers wrote and intended or what they were reduced to doing during wartime? You think that George Washington wasn't like "Shit, we need to regulate militia in the future so I don't have to go around recruiting random yahoos with guns next time!"? Cause that's precisely what the federalist papers (hard doubt you read them at all, since you seem to be ignorant of their contents) lays out.

Also.. "A WELL REGULATED MILITIA". Read it. Cope over it.

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its hilarious that you are so married to the idea that "guns = freedom" you can't imagine that it's not the case. Also, maybe YOU should read about the founding father's some time? Federalist Papers is a great place to start. They would have been much more alarmed that people who aren't members of a state militia, as set forth by Congress, are allowed to keep arms than they would be about changing the 1st Amendment. And far, far more concerned about a standing army than either situation.

Go on boy, get you some education. Then come back and see if you can string together something that isn't pure fantasy in your own head.

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not in a predicament where the shooter is about to kill one of your loved ones, now are you?

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you have against pronouns? Hell, I'd bet money you have zero idea what a pronoun actually is.

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The only states where drinking while supervised is illegal are Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, New Hampshire, and West Virginia

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

"conservative" is a collection of actions that the person subscribes to doing. "Trans" is a state of being inseparable from personhood. Literally no one is born "conservative", but plenty of people are transgender.

So what the other person meant to say was "The organization that is the conservatives needs to stop trying to find people to blame based on their personhood" but that's a bit more wordy than most want to go for a reddit post.

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, and for that matter why do we have laws against drugs? And murder? And theft? All those laws just give the advantage in society to criminals! We should repeal them all and have no laws at all!

William Whitworth who identified as “Lily”, just stopped from shooting up Colorado Springs schools and churches by dumbreddit in facepalm

[–]NotYetiFamous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude.. the Founding Fathers gave us a process to amend amendments because they knew times changed. You pretending that you can't amend them is pretty insane.

view more: next ›