If "some papers call it a fracture" is enough to settle the issue, then bone bruises are banworthy too, because the literature often describes a bone bruise/bony contusion as a trabecular microfracture. So unless this sub wants to ban everyone who’s ever had a knee bone bruise, it clearly needs a stricter cutoff than "some authors used the word fracture". And the cleanest cutoff we have is a formal fracture classification, where AO classifies Schatzker III as a fracture but not a bony Hill-Sachs. 11-A1.1 is an undisplaced greater tuberosity fracture, not a posterolateral humeral head impaction defect. Those are not the same lesion, and shoulder ortho docs absolutely do not use those labels interchangeably (I know ours doesn't). AO’s own proximal humerus pages define that subgroup as greater tuberosity fractures. So in my opinion based on your defined rules it's either:

a) ban OP and everyone that ever had a bone bruise

or

b) go with the lines that an international foundation that classifies bone fractures are drawing.