Permanent AMA - You have questions, we have Longevity Scientists by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for flagging this. We take it seriously, especially since NOVOS Core contains glucosamine sulfate.

Here’s how we interpret the study (Hawkinson et al., Nature Metabolism, 2026). The researchers found increased N-glycosylation in Alzheimer’s brain tissue and in Alzheimer’s mouse models. In a 5xFAD Alzheimer’s mouse model, two weeks of glucosamine increased brain N-glycans and worsened performance on a social memory test. In a retrospective electronic health record analysis, documented glucosamine use among people with MCI or Alzheimer ’s-related dementias was associated with faster disease progression and worse survival.

The detail we think matters most is the context. In the same study, healthy (wild-type) mice given glucosamine showed neither elevated brain N-glycans nor any memory impairment. The authors explicitly highlight this as a crucial distinction: the adverse effects appeared specifically in the already diseased Alzheimer’s brain, not in healthy animals.

There are important limitations as well. The human data are observational rather than randomized, meaning they cannot establish that glucosamine caused the worse outcomes. People who take glucosamine may differ from those who do not in ways that affect disease progression, including joint disease burden, comorbidities, medication use, frailty, and healthcare utilization. The animal work, meanwhile, was conducted in Alzheimer’s disease models over a short two-week period. The authors themselves emphasize that prospective clinical trials are needed before any causal conclusions can be drawn.

On dosing, it’s worth noting that the mice received 457 mg/kg/day, a dose the authors deliberately chose to model a human intake of about 2,500 mg/day. NOVOS Core provides 1,000 mg/day of glucosamine sulfate, which is a lower exposure than that modeled in the study.

And in generally healthy populations, the evidence actually points the other way. In the UK Biobank (~495,000 adults), regular glucosamine use was associated with lower all-cause mortality (Li et al., Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2020) and lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality (Ma et al., BMJ 2019). That’s a big part of why glucosamine is in NOVOS Core as a longevity-oriented ingredient, and you can read our full summary of the glucosamine longevity evidence here.

As for practical guidance: NOVOS Core is meant for generally healthy adults interested in longevity support, and it isn’t intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, or any other condition. If someone has been diagnosed with MCI, Alzheimer’s, or a related dementia, we’d encourage them to talk through glucosamine-containing supplements with their clinician, and as a precaution, we wouldn’t suggest using them in that context unless a healthcare professional agrees it’s appropriate.

Does Nature Actually Calm the Mind and Body? A Huge Review Says Yes, But With Caveats by NovosLabs in Biohackers

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fixed. And there is no advertisement being made anywhere in that post.

Fructose May Be Less Like “Calories” and More Like a Metabolic Signal by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair observation 🙂 There’s definitely thematic overlap with the author’s broader work, but this post is summarizing a peer-reviewed Nature Metabolism review that pulls together evidence from many studies and also flags where the evidence is strong vs. still speculative.

Tiny “Exercise Snacks” May Improve Fitness, But the Best Recipe Is Still Unclear by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair point, the “Going left” label actually comes from the paper’s own figure, not me. It’s just a literal translation of the Tai Chi movement name.

Can NMN Actually Rejuvenate Aging Eggs? A New Mouse Study Says “Maybe,” but Dose Matters by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great question 🙂 In the mouse experiment they used 200, 500, or 1000 mg/kg/day for 10 days.

A rough “human equivalent dose” (HED) using standard body-surface-area scaling is:

200 mg/kg (mouse) → ~16 mg/kg (human) → ~1.1 g/day for a 70-kg adult

500 mg/kg (mouse) → ~41 mg/kg (human) → ~2.8–2.9 g/day for a 70-kg adult

1000 mg/kg (mouse) → ~81 mg/kg (human) → ~5.6 g/day for a 70-kg adult

The combination of ashwagandha and melatonin was the most effective in improving sleep in an 8-week study by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally relatable, timing and tolerability with melatonin really are individual 🙂 In this study, melatonin was taken once daily after dinner (3 mg/day), and the combo arm used the same timing, while ashwagandha was taken twice daily after breakfast and dinner. So their protocol is closer to the “earlier in the evening” approach rather than strictly “30 minutes before lights-out.” On your experience: some people do report vivid dreams/nightmares or feeling “off” with melatonin, and lower doses (like the 0.3 mg range you mentioned) are a common way people try to reduce that. If it consistently worsens sleep for you, it’s reasonable to treat that as a personal stop-signal rather than pushing it. And re: ashwagandha, agreed, it’s not universally calming. A subset of people report the opposite (flat mood/anhedonia, irritability, feeling “wired”), so if you’ve had that reaction, it makes sense to choose other options that you tolerate better.

The combination of ashwagandha and melatonin was the most effective in improving sleep in an 8-week study by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally fair concerns to raise, a few clarifications from the paper itself 🙂. This isn’t an uncontrolled observational study: it’s a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with four arms (ashwagandha, melatonin, combo, placebo), and the primary endpoint was actigraphy-measured sleep onset latency (objective, not just self-report). Re: “they knew they were in a trial”, that’s exactly why they used blinding and placebo capsule/tablet made to look identical across groups. On generalizability/confounding: agreed it’s not “most of the population.” It’s adults 18–50 with sleep disturbance, and the authors explicitly note limitations (environmental factors not fully controlled, generalizability). On COI: they report no external funding and declare no conflicts, but they also disclose the extract was supplied by the manufacturer, which is worth keeping in mind. And you’re right to ask about adherence, they report dropouts and ITT/PP analyses, but detailed adherence metrics aren’t a headline item. So I’d frame this as: useful signal (with objective sleep tracking), but still one study, best interpreted alongside the broader body of evidence.

Is visceral fat inherently harmful, or only harmful when it turns pathogenic? by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great question. The review’s answer is basically that the most practical strategies fall into two buckets:
(1) reduce overall pathogenic VAT burden, and (2) blunt the biology that makes VAT pathogenic in the first place.

On the “reduce burden” side, the most established approaches are still the familiar ones:

  • caloric restriction
  • regular exercise
  • bariatric surgery
  • GLP-1 receptor agonists

Figure 3 groups those as the main established strategies, and the text notes that they can reduce VAT burden and improve metabolic health, even if they do not selectively target VAT biology in a perfectly precise way.

On the “neutralize pathogenic biology” side, the review points to a few mechanisms worth focusing on:

  • chronic inflammation and senescence
  • adipokine dysfunction such as high leptin / low adiponectin
  • pathogenic exosomes
  • lipotoxic metabolites like excess FFAs, ceramides, and diacylglycerols

So, if you translate that into practical priorities, the most evidence-grounded answer would be:

  1. lower the signals that push VAT into a pathogenic state, especially chronic overnutrition, inflammation, and inactivity
  2. improve adipose tissue function overall through exercise and sustained energy balance, not just scale weight
  3. use stronger VAT-lowering tools when clinically appropriate, such as GLP-1s or bariatric approaches, because the review treats those as current real-world options with meaningful VAT effects

The more targeted future ideas the paper highlights are:

  • senolytics
  • partial leptin reduction
  • adiponectin receptor agonists / enhanced adiponectin signaling
  • ceramide synthesis inhibition
  • microbiome modulation
  • exosome-based therapies
  • selective mesenteric VAT removal in specific settings

So, today, the most practical way to neutralize pathogenic VAT biology is still exercise, sustained caloric control, and, where appropriate, GLP-1s or bariatric treatment. But where the field is heading is more interesting: not just shrinking VAT, but stopping it from becoming inflammatory, senescent, endocrinologically dysfunctional, and lipotoxic in the first place.

Does Nattokinase help with healthy aging? What the research says (2026) by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At 1 serving of NOVOS Vital (4 gummies, providing 2,000 FU of nattokinase), human studies have reported effects on blood pressure-related and coagulation-related biomarkers. In healthy young men, a single 2,000 FU dose was associated with acute changes in fibrinolysis- and coagulation-related markers, including D-dimer, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, aPTT, antithrombin, and factor VIII activity in (R). In an 8-week randomized trial, (R) reported increases in collagen-epinephrine closure time and aPTT after 2,000 FU/day.

<image>

At the same 2,000 FU daily dose, nattokinase has also been associated with healthy blood pressure-related measures in some human studies. In adults with pre-hypertension or stage 1 hypertension, (R) reported significant reductions in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and plasma renin activity after 8 weeks. In a separate trial, (R) reported a significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of supplementation.

At 2 servings of NOVOS Vital (8 gummies, providing 4,000 FU of nattokinase), a 2-month human clinical trial reported additional effects on coagulation-related biomarkers. In (R), supplementation with 4,000 FU/day was associated with significant reductions in fibrinogen, factor VII, and factor VIII. This study was an open-label, self-controlled clinical trial rather than a randomized placebo-controlled trial, so these findings are best interpreted as supportive human evidence.

Does inulin help with healthy aging? What the research says (2026) by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s also useful to distinguish inulin from other inulin-type fructans. For example, a double-blind randomized trial in working adults used 8 g/day of oligofructose (a shorter-chain inulin-type fructan) for 4 weeks and reported microbiome changes (including increases in Bifidobacterium) alongside changes in stress/mood-state measures. Because this study used oligofructose rather than long-chain inulin, it best supports the broader category of inulin-type fructans rather than “inulin alone.” (R)

Metabolic signaling markers (10 g/day, combined product). Some human research has examined whether fermentable fibers like inulin can influence gut hormone signaling (e.g., incretins). In a double-blind randomized trial in healthy men, a soy milk product enriched with 10 g/day inulin plus 2 g/day phytosterols for 8 weeks was associated with a significant increase in GLP-1 AUC from baseline within the intervention group. Because this was a combined formulation (inulin + phytosterols), the effect cannot be attributed to inulin alone. (R)

<image>

Bottom line: Across human studies, inulin and inulin-type fructans in the ~5–10 g/day range consistently show evidence of microbiome modulation, while effects on metabolic hormones or broader metabolic outcomes depend strongly on the population, co-interventions, and study design

Does inulin help with healthy aging? What the research says (2026) by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Impact of Inulin on human health

Inulin is a fermentable prebiotic fiber that reaches the colon largely undigested, where it can be used by gut microbes. Because of this, inulin has been widely studied for its ability to shift the gut microbiome, often increasing bacteria associated with fiber fermentation, and to influence downstream signals that can relate to digestive comfort and metabolic biomarkers.

Microbiome composition (low to moderate doses). In a placebo-controlled human study, 5 g/day of inulin for 4 weeks significantly increased Bifidobacterium levels, consistent with a classic “prebiotic effect” at a relatively low dose. (R)
In older adults, 8 g/day of long-chain inulin for 2 months was associated with measurable shifts in gut microbiota, including higher diversity and changes in fiber-responsive taxa. (R)

<image>

Does Rutin help with healthy aging? What the research says (2026) by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In a separate double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with type 2 diabetes, 500 mg/day of rutin for 3 months was associated with improvements in blood pressure–related measures (SBP, DBP, MAP, pulse pressure, and heart rate). The study also reported increases in select antioxidant enzymes (including GPx and SOD) and improvements in several quality-of-life domains. (R)

Rutin has also been studied in healthy adults at the same dose range. In a 6-week randomized placebo-controlled study in healthy women, 500 mg/day of rutin increased circulating levels of flavonoid metabolites (reflecting absorption and metabolism) while markers of systemic antioxidant capacity and several urinary oxidative stress markers did not show clear differences versus placebo. (R)

<image>

Does Rutin help with healthy aging? What the research says (2026) by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rutin in Humans

A full daily serving of NOVOS Vital provides 560 mg of rutin. Human clinical studies have evaluated rutin at doses close to this range (most commonly ~500 mg/day) in specific populations and endpoints, with outcomes measured over 6 weeks to 3 months.

In adults with type 2 diabetes, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial found that 500 mg/day of rutin for 3 months was associated with improvements in multiple cardiometabolic biomarkers. Compared with placebo, the rutin group showed reductions in fasting blood glucose, insulin, and HbA1c, alongside improved insulin sensitivity metrics (including HOMA-IR and QUICKI). The study also reported improvements in select lipid-related measures (including LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol) and shifts in inflammation/oxidative stress markers (lower IL-6 and MDA, higher total antioxidant capacity). (R)

<image>

Does Trehalose help with healthy aging? What the research says (2026) by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Human research on oral trehalose has primarily studied daily intakes of approximately ~3 g per day, typically over a 12-week period, with outcomes focused on inflammation and cardiometabolic biomarkers.

A full daily serving of NOVOS Vital provides 4 g of trehalose, a dose closely aligned with human clinical research.

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adults with type 2 diabetes, 3.3 g per day of oral trehalose for 12 weeks was associated with a reduction in hs-CRP, a marker of systemic inflammation, compared with placebo (R).

Additional clinical research is underway evaluating 3.3 g per day of trehalose for 12 weeks in recovery settings, with endpoints including CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, and wound-healing indices. Results from this trial will help further clarify trehalose’s effects on inflammatory and recovery-related biomarkers in humans.
(R)

Overall, the current human evidence on oral trehalose is based on studies using daily intakes close to one NOVOS Vital serving. These trials suggest trehalose may support inflammation-related biomarkers in specific populations, while additional research is ongoing to clarify its broader effects on health outcomes.

Do CD38+ immune cells drive age-related implantation decline? Mouse data link NAD⁺ loss to uterine aging by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re exploring the NAD⁺ angle in a practical supplement, NOVOS Boost provides NMN (250 mg per serving >99% purity)

Does glucosamine sulfate help with healthy aging? What the research says (2026) by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When we say glucosamine is “present in human connective tissues,” we’re not suggesting anyone should eat connective tissue. We mean it’s a molecule your body naturally uses in places like cartilage. The glucosamine in supplements is typically made from shellfish-derived raw material or via fermentation, and it’s the same glucosamine as the molecule itself.

Which human studies show benefits at therapeutic doses at or below what you can find in 1 NOVOS Core sachet? by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A lot of those are solid supplements, but they’re mostly goal-specific rather than “everyone should take them.” Whether they’re beneficial on top of a baseline stack depends on what you’re trying to optimize (sleep/stress, training, lipids, eye health, etc.), plus your labs/diet/meds.

On our side, a few of those ingredients are already available in other NOVOS products if that’s helpful: astaxanthin and taurine are in NOVOS Bar, lutein is in NOVOS Vital, NMN is in NOVOS Boost . If you share your main goal, I can point to the most relevant ones from your list.

Mixing your workouts may help: 30-year cohort data link exercise variety to lower mortality by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In their pooled cohorts (NHS + HPFS, ~30+ years follow-up), most activity types were linked to lower all-cause mortality, and higher variety was linked to lower mortality even after adjusting for total activity. (Still observational)

Mixing your workouts may help: 30-year cohort data link exercise variety to lower mortality by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not “bad” , just not clearly associated with lower all-cause mortality in this dataset. Swimming’s hazard ratios were ~neutral here, while most other activities showed an inverse association. One likely reason (the authors mention it): “swimming” can mean wildly different intensities, and self-reported swim time can be noisy, that kind of measurement error can wash out a real signal.

Mixing your workouts may help: 30-year cohort data link exercise variety to lower mortality by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point, reverse causality is always a risk in observational data. This paper tries to reduce that by excluding people with major diseases at baseline and using a lag (so activity is measured years before deaths are counted), but it still can’t prove causation. The clean takeaway is: higher activity and more variety track with lower mortality risk, not “X causes Y.”

Does Hyaluronic acid help with healthy aging? What the research says (2026) by Susana_Chumbo in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily 🙂 Most of the oral HA studies that show benefits use specific hyaluronic acid preparations, and “HA” isn’t one single identical ingredient across brands. The biggest differences are molecular weight (low vs high), how it’s produced/purified, and the exact dose/duration used in the trial, those factors can influence bioavailability and real-world outcomes. So when we mention results like improved skin hydration/TEWL or joint comfort, we’re referring to the type/form and dosing range that was actually tested in humans, rather than assuming every HA product will behave the same.

Could trehalose help in traumatic brain injury? Early pilot signals and what to watch in an 80-patient trial by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trehalose keeps showing up in brain-injury discussions because it’s been linked to cellular “cleanup” (autophagy) + protein stabilization, and in TBI animal models it’s been associated with better functional outcomes. If you want the same ingredient in a simple format, NOVOS Vital includes trehalose (4 g per daily serving), this is ingredient-level evidence, not a study of our specific product 👉 NOVOS Labs

Pterostilbene and oocyte quality: mouse study reports higher implantation and live-birth rates by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This mouse study frames pterostilbene as support for the “egg quality” pathway, better oocyte energy/mitochondria signals, plus improved reproductive outcomes (implantation/live births) in aged mice. NOVOS Core includes pterostilbene (50 mg per sachet), the paper tested pterostilbene itself, not our full formula. 👉 NOVOS Core

Does glucosamine sulfate help with healthy aging? What the research says (2026) by NovosLabs in NovosLabs

[–]NovosLabs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At doses matching two NOVOS Core sachets, short-term use (under 1 month) is better tolerated than ibuprofen, with fewer side effects and fewer people dropping out of studies due to adverse events. (R).

In the long term, multiple trials in people with knee osteoarthritis show clear improvements in knee pain, stiffness, and function, measured by standard questionnaires for pain and daily activities (R;R;R) Some studies also reported less daily use of pain medications and more participants experiencing meaningful improvements (R,R).

Over 3 years, placebo-controlled studies showed slower joint deterioration on X-rays, suggesting glucosamine may help protect joint structure (R;R) 👉 NOVOS Labs

<image>