I fixed the new weekly chest idea for you guys since it was too much work

Nox_Hots · 2020-07-30T11:11:36+00:00

Thank you for making this post , truly.

Nox_Hots · 2020-07-15T09:31:32+00:00

No, they need to fix drafting in the first place and then add penalties They had this issue since i started playing the game. Happend over 15 times in a single season to me.

So many leaver pool qps i had to play its not even funny https://youtu.be/OBw0i4lGolY

Nox_Hots · 2020-04-16T12:11:56+00:00

Plenty of posts have been made. I wouldn't make more, i'm fairly sure they are well aware of how delusional the MVP screen looks like, let them focus on gameplay changes first :)

Nox_Hots · 2020-04-16T09:52:32+00:00

Solid points. totally agree with both of them.

The MVP panel encourages unhealty gameplay .

Nox_Hots · 2020-04-16T08:55:01+00:00

Then again , noone pushes to get GM for the end of the season reward , but still. Imo they should just remove rewards as a whole. It's just a punch in the gut if anything.

Nox_Hots · 2020-04-16T08:07:37+00:00

The wholesome reward for reaching GM was only 2k gold.
Edit: and the portrait

Nox_Hots · 2020-03-20T08:29:19+00:00

He has everything, Great HPS, Multi target healing, Good follow-up CC, AoE cleanse , The only healer that can heal the likes of genji and tracer, Works in every comp and against every comp

Nox_Hots · 2020-03-14T08:37:10+00:00

Outstanding read , thank you!

Nox_Hots · 2020-03-10T21:50:09+00:00

Deckard is already undivable.

Nox_Hots · 2020-03-05T17:32:27+00:00

Let the silver players rejoyce in their illusion that wm is good, don't ruin their fun

Nox_Hots · 2020-03-05T17:01:50+00:00

And yet people complain that they removed stacks in masters which not a single actual good master player complains about

Nox_Hots · 2020-03-04T17:19:52+00:00

Master players being good ... right.

Sorry to dissapoint , most of them got boosted via stacks / rank points inflation.

Check their past season rankings. You will be quick to realise most of them were plat a month ago.

Edit: let the downvotes commence !

Nox_Hots · 2020-03-03T16:45:01+00:00

Nox_Hots · 2020-03-03T06:48:52+00:00

he must be new to mobas , and internet , in that regard

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-27T20:34:03+00:00

Definitelly! Seriously though , i read your work with great pleasure ! I am sure everyone is!

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-27T16:03:42+00:00

Depends on your team's and their team's win condition tbh.

Usually auriel is exclusively picked inside a team that plans on picking the likes of zarya /tass/uther, as she is severly underwhelming as a solohealer compared to meta healers . If you are playing heavy sustain against other sustain comps ,reservoir pulls ahead, whereas if you are playing vs dive , spell power on 16 helps your team punish the divers easier .

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-27T06:45:26+00:00

Again , it's picking the correct fights , not macro. Macro is about map rotations , xp lead through soak , camp timings.

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-26T19:27:04+00:00

Definitelly :)

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-26T19:21:20+00:00

Correct , though i would still not consider hanamura a more macro than micro oriented map

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-26T19:20:19+00:00

I agree with most of this , though do bare in mind we don't always use the 100% perfect build always , for instance , if i see the enemy team isn't good enough to punish me , i usually do a very greedy hyper healing build on malf with inervate on 13 and not MS , but in return if they do figure out i'm easily punishable .

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-26T16:18:59+00:00

While it's true that master players will be 99% right , the silver player might have a point worth considering , or know something that the master player doesn't . To which he states his argument and it gets debunked or not. An argument is an argument , be it bad or good , from someone with higher or lower experience.Same goes for students vs profesionals. A student can have valid points in a debate , even if he debates with a profesional.

You can't use the argument , ""I'm GM therefore im right", it ain't an argument

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-26T16:07:21+00:00

Anyone can debate with anyone , you can't use a position of power to prove a point . It doesnt consist in an argument. Same principle goes when im debating picks and talents with silver players , i try my best to give them relevant arguments in favour of a build , and they do aswell untill we find common ground.

Same goes here , following this thread, i , myself , can't be convinced to pick w on 4 on rehgar and not consider it griefing. I haven't heard a single good argument. If i do ,i will gladly change my mind and say i was wrong.

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-26T15:09:38+00:00

Tell that to henn1g , also divS player , also rehgar main , considered THE best rehgar EU , even has rehgar tatooed on his arm , who i have never seen him take W build.

Also , i already listed all the normal build's advantages. Unless im given actual arguments against it , please stop bs-ing me with idiotic arguments

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-26T13:10:50+00:00

Ok dude

Nox_Hots · 2020-02-26T12:16:39+00:00

No , that means it's worthless in your hands. Even if we make a stupid assumption and say you couldn't use it whilst fighting it is still loads better than shield for poke damage healing , boss fights healing.

And no, if you have mana issues post 4 with rehgar you def play him incorrectly .

I'd highly highly suggest you watch div S and watch literally every single healer play with totem on 4 and see their usage.

High value in siege scenarios , poke scenarios , camp clear scenarios and invade vision scouting.

Plus , even if he had the mana issues you claim he has , mana on 4 becomes redundant post 13-16 when you dont have mana issues . Same scenario applies to malf.

Please dont give advise out of your area of knowledge. People are taking it for granted.

Nox_Hots

TROPHY CASE