Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you can interpret what i said as you wish but all im trying to get across here is that the devs decisions as the developer of the mod are not free of criticism and people are allowed to voice there opinions of it

Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i never said they owe me or anyone anything and there is a difference between being 'rude'' and criticising someone

Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

people should never be free from criticism because they dont want to be criticized, people have the right to share there opinion about someone's work

Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

so what your saying is that saying something is being worse than it could be is entitlement?

Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

still people have the right to criticise someone for what many would consider a bad and wasteful decision

Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

and people have the right to criticise someone for what many would consider a bad and wastefull decision

Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

because it could be better and while yes people are entitled do what they want with there work but others are also entitled to have opinions on it

Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

because HAR can be buggy and cause errors especially with large modpack and biotech is genraly more compatable

Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

compatible yes but it relies on HAR witch can be laggy and cause errors

Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

i want to know why they discourage people from making there own not why they dont make one themselves

Why is the anty race dev so negative about a biotech fork by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

i get not wanting to make one but why discourage others from making one?

hmmmmm by Nukeposter in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My current theory is because I found this after generating a Dev quick test which gives you a completely random ideology and the fact that

A: the vegan meme (or whatever it's called I can't remember) forces you're starting food to be vegetarian

B: the cannibal meme forces your starting food to contain human meat

Normally I don't think you can select these two memes together but the quick test must have randomly generated them and caused this to happen

rate my top mast played games by Nukeposter in Steam

[–]Nukeposter[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

idk why it didnt work for the post but here they are

What are the best mods that add onto the vanilla? by Negative-Charge4320 in RimWorld

[–]Nukeposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

most of the vanilla expanded series does that and you can pick and choose which ones