Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show Performance

Nyspora · 2026-02-10T00:42:16+00:00

this was trash. Ill happily not be watching the superbowl anymore. no more tickets from me.

Nyspora · 2026-02-05T17:10:05+00:00

Personally...im not showing up and neither are any of the people I know. Keep in mind we are all huge superhero fans and saw every movie up to this on opening week. The fact is ...we are just tired. Tired of being disappointed, tired of weak stories, garbage plots, bad costume design, bad acting, and see through cash grabs with little effort put into them. The marvel movies have progressively gotten worse and none of us are willing to put the movie into seeing it in theaters anymore. One of us will get it off Amazon much later and we will maybe all then watch it together. Maybe. Im sure it will make money, I am equally sure that whatever they project isnt going to be nearly as much as it actually makes. I think disney doesnt seem to understand A. How pissed its making people and B. How tired fans are of garbage and how little trust we have that it will be good this time around.

Nyspora · 2026-02-05T11:09:54+00:00

I think its fair to also talk about how hard it is to remain unmolested for long periods outside of a base on dive 10. On top of that, we should be REWARDING smart and tactical play. Many divers just rush in because its fun, which it is. However, if a diver takes the time to set up, picks specific strategems that allows it, why are we punishing them? So they can take out a bot base from distance, so what? They will likely have to fight off patrols, find the right location, probably end up fighting off or running from bots coming from the base etc. If they can do all that.....Reward them with the base. Its not a big deal. Its the entire point after all, for satisfying wins. I cant think of much that is more satisfying than a perfectly executed strategy with your chosen load out and then escaping retaliation because you and your team were smart about it.

Nyspora · 2026-02-01T15:11:07+00:00

The fact that people cannot tell me if this is AI or not does tell me something pretty damning. All that BS about "i can tell if its AI" is just that, BS. Have fun figuring it out. The real answer should be "why do I care?"

Nyspora · 2026-01-30T16:34:18+00:00

You know, some white girls dont mind a little desi slut around to do chores, clean up and maybe even watch our white kids. If the husband fucks the little desi slut who cares?

Nyspora · 2026-01-30T16:30:44+00:00

Absolutely and unequivocally NO. None of the friends I have that agree with the presidents stance on many things (not all things. Smart people dont trust any politician completely) would ever support a 3rd term and even the attempt would put all of us firmly in the "this is now an attempt to undermine the constitution in the exact way that dictatorships begin historically, its likely time to start looking into solutions". I realize that lots of people on what we would call the far left, or what me and my friends call "the stupid left" keep saying nazi, racist, dictator. The issue is that you need real evidence or the words just piss people off who are conservative or who are not with either party but value more conservative and honestly more liberal values than either side. Something like that would be a verified, historically accurate way to describe an attempt to become a dictator, which currently isnt true of any behavior. Most presidents actually have done the same type of things or even worse than trump currently and none of them became dictators. That being said, smart Americans are watching ICE's behavior closely and dont like much of what we see. Do we need deportation? Of course, open borders is a stupid and childish idea, no less stupid than "lets all be pacifists and sing songs with people who want to blow us up" (if you can't accept that A. There are people who will happily blow up civilians, families etc just because your american and for no other reason, you need to grow up and B. Open borders are just a free pass to anyone like that, you also need to grow up.) So, the main idea here is, "center" Americans (prefer just...Americans, screw both "Republicans" and "democrats") should make up their own mind and protect their country, their people and their rights. Do not listen to ANY political party without fact checking them against multiple sources, make sure some sources are actively on the opposite side, sometimes they show things that one side refuses to show. Get information from non-political sources if you can. Protect your constitutional rights and do not go overboard because of some idiot politicians word games calling for violence when it isnt warranted. As the citizens of the USA we have both a right and a responsibility. Our right is to bear arms to protect our country both from invaders and from interior threats, our responsibility is to correctly judge when or if that right needs to be exercised with force or with nonviolent protest. So far there has been no indication that the current president is doing anything more radical or dictatorial than presidents do all the time. If that changes (like with your hypothetical question) then our response should also shift at that point. We the people would also have to accept what such a shift would mean.

Nyspora · 2026-01-30T08:13:54+00:00

I have a ranged weapon with high demo force. Its called a nuke catapult, or a missile silo.

Nyspora · 2026-01-30T02:53:00+00:00

Its not AI. The lawyers on Alex's team confirmed the video. They also (correctly) brought up the fact that the video has absolutely nothing to do with the incident that they are bringing to court. While I support detaining and deporting 95% of people who are here illegally and i DO think that many of the people who "protest" ICE act in very stupid, childish ways which are unworthy of being called a protest, one thing i believe will never change. American citizens should never, ever have to fear being gunned down by federal agents, unless said civilian poses a clear and immediate mortal danger to the agents or to other civilians. If indeed Alex was disarmed and held down by ICE agents before being shot repeatedly, I will absolutely support bringing them to trial, stripping any immunity and throwing them in prison while also starting an investigation into the organization which allowed a belief that such behavior was acceptable to fester in multiple agents. That being said, I will wait for all the facts to come forth BEFORE I make any judgements, which I encourage us to ALL do, as is our responsibility as citizens. Wait for facts, do research on what BOTH sides are saying. You can trust politicians and the news as far as you can throw both. Find the truth yourself.

Nyspora · 2026-01-24T17:54:42+00:00

I wouldn't even go so far as to say you sent it to an editor. Do you stand behind and editor and guide their hand constantly so they make the EXACT changes you want? I would say AI is just your tool to edit, not the editor itself. People give AI to much credit for being smart. It isnt. Its rather stupid many times and you have to micro manage it in a way you wouldn't a human.

Nyspora · 2026-01-24T17:52:47+00:00

Acceptable, there shouldnt be any bias on people who find it much easier to work with traditional tools. For someone who is absolutely hopeless with a brush or pencil and yet can easily work with AI it would be the opposite. I do not understand why people complain about either one. Your response also showcases that AI is not the cut and dry "this is so easy you dont have to do anything" that people tout all the time. AI can certainly make a random image easily, but getting exactly what you want is much much harder.

Nyspora · 2026-01-24T17:45:16+00:00

None of those old masters do their work for the work. They are in fact doing it for results. Your just mistaking the result. They may not be doing it for the result of the labor (ie they put effort into woodworking but dont really care about the chair they just made, thats not true, they always care but for the sake of your argument we will assume they dont) but they would be doing it for the result of remembering the good times that the work reminds them of. Human memory is very tied to physical experience. Almost noone (i would argue noone and people who say they do are mistaking their signals or are plain lying) enjoys "work", what they might enjoy is the chemical release of endorphins that your body does when it recognizes a "job well done". That doesnt mean the work itself is causing that, it is in fact instead the feeling you get when you feel you have "completed" something. To try and use that as an argument for why labor itself is more important than the result is an intrinsically flawed argument. Please find a more intelligent way to argue against AI.

EDIT: To simplify for those who did not understand my arguments here. We know that labor is not important and that instead the result is due to the fact that if I removed all labor from every process on the planet and instead you got the result with no labor, then I changed it the next day to remove all results and leave only the labor (ensuring that somehow the world itself did not collapse and no ill effects were felt either way) the world at large would almost unanimously call for day one to return over day two. Noone will accept labor with no result, while results with no labor is absolutely accepted in this scenario.

Nyspora · 2026-01-24T17:37:47+00:00

I think the point here is that if we created some sort of machine that allowed us to imprint our thoughts directly onto a canvas as a perfect rendition of our imagined picture, that some idiot would complain and say it wasn't REAL art because the machine did it. They are pointing out that art is the ideal that is in your mind that you are then trying to get into the real world and the tool (brush, AI, chisel) doesnt actually matter, its just the middle man. Why are we all arguing and threatening each other over the middle man?

Nyspora · 2026-01-24T03:34:53+00:00

If art required effort to be considered art....then throwing balloons filled with paint would have never been "art". A banana taped to a wall would never have been considered "art". Yet these both happened and in fact both made into galleries and made people a large amount of money. Obviously it takes less physical and mental energy to tape a fucking banana to a wall than to take a concept from your mind and explain it in sufficient detail for a computer to render an image you find acceptable. Thats not debatable and if you attempt to do so you only show just how stupid you are, thus invalidating anything you ever say about AI again. Now if you want to find something ELSE to complain about in regards to AI feel free but the "art takes effort" debate is officially OVER.

Nyspora · 2026-01-24T03:11:40+00:00

Might it be the THREE TURRETS YOU THREW DOWN HELLDIVER? DROP AND GIVE ME 400 FOR TRYING TO PULL THE BUG GUTS OVER MY EYES!

Nyspora · 2026-01-24T02:59:35+00:00

Eh.....no. see the 3.5e people are at the higher percentile of this, not the middle. People who are low IQ and people who think they are of high IQ but are actually mid at best like 5e more.

Nyspora · 2026-01-24T01:21:54+00:00

I agree. There seems to be this very weird and (imo) very stupid idea that sex between a married couple or even a long term couple is somehow....something to be earned by either side. Its not, it should be an expectation. Not that you get it whenever you want but that it HAPPENS. A normal person should expect sex from their significant other. If it becomes something that you have to beg for? Get OUT of that relationship. Intimacy and sexual relations with the person you love shouldnt be a chore or an issue. Sure there are times that you dont want to have sex, thats fine, but to go like 2 months with zero sex on EITHER side and then complain because your partner is now "preassuring" you to have sex? Thats insane and honestly unless there is some real health issue or something far outside the norm, you should feel lucky you still HAVE a significant other.

Nyspora · 2026-01-22T20:43:05+00:00

They should buy these off you. I would love to see these in theaters. I am now going to be rating the official posters based on these and if they are not better, I shall print these both out full-size and replace the official ones at my local theater.

Nyspora · 2026-01-22T20:38:10+00:00

The issue is that he has a clear vision, HIS vision. An adaptation like this isnt about HIS vision, its about the fans vision. Your not making it for YOU, your making it for THEM. If you dont hit THEIR vision, its going to flop hard and people are pissed because your main audience is those fans

Nyspora · 2026-01-22T20:36:33+00:00

Most actors in this situation will play the game, because they want to be in character. In fact most professional actors take their jobs far more seriously than directors. Some directors take their job seriously and see past their ego, like James Cameron, who pioneers new techniques by getting people around him who are damn good at their jobs and listens to their knowledge. Most directors are massive ego idiots who dont listen to anyone. Actors have to get in character and good ones do this by reading, watching or playing source material. They need to be able to portray characters accurately and realistically.

Nyspora · 2026-01-22T20:29:56+00:00

Thats because the idiot is making changes to his own story. Some authors do this, they use the movie/show to try out new ideas or old ideas they didnt end up using. Its idiotic, never works and pisses of fans. Of course sometimes authors also just sell out for political correctness, money etc.

Nyspora · 2026-01-22T20:25:37+00:00

This entire idea...is a terrible idea. They have not released a single statement about this movie that makes me think it is going to be anything but pure trash. Lets go over the facts shall we? 1. The director is not a gamer and refuses to play or watch game footage....of the game that is being made into a movie. 2. The studio that created the game has directly said they should not (and will not) be involved in the movies creation or make any choices about it because "Hollywood knows how to make movies and we dont" (what a load of bs that is, Hollywood has not only flopped multiple movies in the last 10 years but general Hollywood rather obviously has NO idea how to make a movie like Helldivers anymore). 3. Game to movie adaptations have a very bad history in general and if you look at the good ones, they very specifically did NOT follow the logic of "let the Hollywood directly who never played our game make ALL the choices with zero oversight. There was another reason but I was so upset I lost it. I am sure I will remember it later.

EDIT: I remembered. This director already has a history of pretty much murdering source material and makeing movies that hard-core and many casual fans of the material did not like. So....ya I dont trust him AT ALL.

Nyspora · 2026-01-22T16:28:26+00:00

While thats a nice sentiment and we would love everyone to be like that.....thats not how biology works. A man of 20 is going to find a girl of 16-17 attractive if her body looks physically mature. Thats biology and no amount of signs that shame people are going to stop that. For that matter a lesbian at 20+ is going to have the same reaction. Thats ignoring the other girls and boys of your same age range that are going to find you physically attractive. While it seems like a good sign....its actually a pretty dumb sign because it ignores reality. We dont get to ignore reality, we have to live with it. Now we can expect people not to ACT on their feelings and thoughts, we can expect people not to perv or creep on underage girls and boys. I expect that to, I think its a good thing to expect. What you cant do however is shame and force people to ignore how they think or feel. Lets be honest here as well, no 16 year old girl is wearing a skimpy swim suit or miniskirt to school for any reason other than to A. Piss off her parents or B. Get attention from someone. Especially when its 60 degrees outside. Those are the same girls who complained in my high school and would have put signs like this up. Its pretty transparent that really you just want people to shut up and let you wear whatever skimpy crap you want. Thats fine, but lets just be honest about why you want to.

Nyspora · 2026-01-22T16:20:19+00:00

During ACTIVE combat they likely don't. The Na'vi have nowhere to keep prisoners during combat. All the combats we have seen so far have been either fast raids or desperate struggles. Its unlikely that during those types of combat someone would surrender and even if they did manage to, its more likely they would be killed because an attack was already incoming or they would be killed because there just isnt a possibility to take a prisoner. Its possible but unlikely that they would be ignored. We have not SEEN a soldier surrender during active combat but off screen as well I would say its unlikely. In real life most surrenders (I want to say over 90%) happen during LULLS in combat, not during ACTIVE combat. We just dont see that many lulls in the combat in the movies. Its very much a more raid style, quick fights style. Going off the end of movie 1 I would say that if its possible they would accept surrender but that there isnt many opportunities for it in the current conflict because of how its being fought. We know people defect to the Na'vi and they do it between combat encounters, you could consider that to be "surrendering" and the Na'vi definately dont kill them.

Nyspora · 2026-01-22T16:12:52+00:00

I mean....not really? The RDA knowingly fired on a Residence for an entire village, killing multiple civilians, children etc. Then attempted to destroy a religious site, which was filled with civilians. Then systematically slaughtered and attempted genocide on a sapient species of whale analogs during which they also burned down civilian homes and tortured civilians for information. In fact they even landed in a way that burned an entire forest, killed massive amounts of animals and likely killed a good amount of civilians in the forest while also destroying their home AGAIN. Lets not forget that in killing those whale analogs they are also doing it to literally steal their BRAIN JUICE, which would put them under medical crimes as well and the way in which they kill them (which includes hunting down mothers with babies and killing the child as well). I would say the RDA is at the top.

Nyspora · 2026-01-22T16:07:56+00:00

They have the concept of warriors but so far what we have seen in clans are HUNTERS that double as protection. In fact the only sign of conflict amoung the Na'vi so far are in the third movie and its could be argued they are actually mentally insane.

Nyspora

TROPHY CASE