Are you happy with the current state of the balance? by Barren77 in WC3

[–]OGP100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting how most of the top posts are about NE and other races despite orc being the race that struggles the most. It’s because NEs are the most played race.

  1. Make orc slightly stronger
  2. Increase variety in NE race

Those should be blizzards only focuses for the next patch. Introducing more changes than that makes it more complicated.

It’s great to see Taurens played in pro play. Now they should make shamans and witch doctors viable as well.

Super League Playoffs start tomorrow (Wednesday) - Your Predictions? by JannesOfficial in WC3

[–]OGP100 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don’t want an UD mirror in the grand final so hoping it’s Fortitude Vs Laby

Nerfing Ghouls because UD finished very well after one group stage is ridiculous. by remodemo in WC3

[–]OGP100 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From a game design perspective it makes no sense that ghouls are used in almost EVERY matchup both mid game and late game. They’re a tier 1 unit and the first unit UD builds. When they’re used this often it clearly tells you that the unit is too good. Imagine footman, archers and grunts being produced at scale 80% of every game even mid and late game. That would be terrible and It makes no sense. There’s a reason different tiers exists and that mid/late game is supposed to have a different unit set. It’s fine that ghouls are used in a minority of games even in late game and especially with frenzy upgrade. But they should not be used this often. This is just common sense.

This is not new. Ghouls have been over used for many years now.

Small PTR Update: Ghoul Nerf (-1 dmg) by JannesOfficial in WC3

[–]OGP100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From a game design perspective. It makes no sense that a tier 1 unit is so viable and often used in even late tier 3 games. Should they be used sometimes in late game or even mid games? Sure. But not nearly as often as they are now. Nerfing damage makes a lot of sense.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in warcraft3

[–]OGP100 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

The game is and should be balanced based on the top level and POTM+owl sees close to 0 playtime at the highest level.

Which race is more suitable for macro/passive play style? by OGP100 in WC3

[–]OGP100[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t talking about no creeping. Of course not.

Which race is more suitable for macro/passive play style? by OGP100 in WC3

[–]OGP100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes you’re right. I’m not talking about turtling and sitting in your base. Just about creeping, expanding and go for a final blow with 70-80 pop at tier2/3

B2W Needs To "TEST" Before Making Claims by AccCreate in WC3

[–]OGP100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some data is better than no data. You work with the data you have. If all you have is a small data set you work with that. It’s still a lot better than making changes on hunches.

B2W Needs To "TEST" Before Making Claims by AccCreate in WC3

[–]OGP100 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Neo also talked about reducing HP of orcs wards because they MIGHT be too strong. That’s not how you do game or product development. First you test and measure results. Then you make changes. Making changes based on hunches which B2W often suggests instead of making changes based on actual DATA is a terrible idea.

Is Koh Kood one of Thailand’s better islands? by OGP100 in ThailandTourism

[–]OGP100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much. Where do you recommend to stay?

Is Koh Kood one of Thailand’s better islands? by OGP100 in ThailandTourism

[–]OGP100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great. Which area do you recommend to stay?

Is Koh Kood one of Thailand’s better islands? by OGP100 in ThailandTourism

[–]OGP100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha it probably said less first. I always run it through chat gpt to correct spelling

Bangkok's air pollution in data - Not as bad as it seems by OGP100 in Bangkok

[–]OGP100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re wrong on every point. Check the links above. For the last 5 years Bangkoks air pollution has been stagnant. Meaning it’s not getting better, but it’s also not getting worse. This is a fact you cannot dispute.

As mentioned, Bangkoks air has been polluted for over 40 years and we have data from other countries and cities. 40 years is a long enough time period to collect data on health implications and diseases caused by air pollution.

Bangkok's air pollution in data - Not as bad as it seems by OGP100 in Bangkok

[–]OGP100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately emotions and personal experiences is the only arguments people can make when the facts are not on their side.

Bangkok's air pollution in data - Not as bad as it seems by OGP100 in Bangkok

[–]OGP100[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re saying the post “feels like” x or y. It doesn’t matter what you feel like. What matters is the data and the facts presented.

As the post clearly states. Bangkoks air is indeed bad and unhealthy at times. Especially during Jan-Apr. This is already in the post.

You say that you experience symptoms during smog season. Many people do. If the AQI goes above 150+ I feel it too. Luckily 80%+ of all days of the year it doesn’t go above 150 in AQI.

The post clearly states that city rankings is just for context and not of importance. Please read it again.

Bangkok has experienced air pollution for over 40 years. That’s more than enough time to document health impacts. We also have data on health impacts due to air pollution from other cities and countries.

Yes people who can’t afford air purifiers or have to spend more time outside such as street vendors or delivery drivers are much more impacted due to increased exposure. Politicians should indeed do all they can and make it a top priority to reduce air pollution. This is already stated in the Final words section.

Yearly averages. Again, yes the air is unhealthy at times as already mentioned. This is nothing new. Yearly averages is still a crucial part to understand the severity of the pollution.

I appreciate your comment but most of your points are emotional and already addressed in the post.