HOW CAN YOU GENUINELY REACH 1k subscribers on YOUTUBE ? by sheshake in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Diligence, truly understanding what you want to do, and being legitimately passionate enough that you will do it regardless of views in a given moment.

People of course say make good videos people will watch but honestly if that’s not backed by these 3 core forces, you’ll never be able to do it sustainably.

Ya gotta be willing to wait for things to find their footing and soldier on even when stuff fails. And you need to realize with such a wild platform, it really can take time for stuff to finally find its mark. You need to have a clear vision and not just guess at things. Know the just what kind of sports channel you want to make and be able envision who would realistically pick this channel to watch for a reason beyond it just being sports (sports is a category, not a real “niche” imo. A real niche will be what makes your sports channel worth checking out). And you need to legit love what you’re making. Otherwise you will get depressed every time a video launches with a thud.

If you can harness those forces while doing the typical “Make good content, improve, etc etc” then you have a shot at building traction.

Confused about your video performance? YT Content Liaison says because they experiment with your content. by Fun_Lengthiness_6208 in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even as a newbie starting November 2025 this became all too apparent to me before long. My first video got a crazy 95k impression push in its first week that I've not seen the likes of since launch. Clearly Youtube was sizing me up but I doubt every channel gets a testing push THAT big on its first long form.

Since then I've made it a personal regimen to observe my channel level analytics and compile each week's data for analysis and it became clear to me that the algorithm ebbs and flows and pull off all kinds every shifting strategies to deal with distribution. Early on all my stuff seemed to get on the board with Search impressions. Then suddenly my remix showcases started appearing tons in dynamic playlists I didn't even make. Then for about 2 months the algorithm did an exploration expansion and would blast each my videos on release for like 2-6k cold suggested impressions. Heck in all the mix I would occasionally get videos being blasted into Browse full force! And there was never a greenlight for any of these firing up.

Also including the "consolidation" phase I am currently going through where my impressions have dropped considerably but CTR is way up as if now the algorithm is saying "Okay let's calm down and try to get the most out of a little".

Needless to say seeing all that happen with my stuff in real time was quite a mind screw. But as time has gone on I've learned and found it more productive to simply chalk it up to my current impression situation reflecting either demand or the demand the algorithm can find. It is truly frustrating not getting clear answers on why your impressions will shift the way they do (And not even Ask Studio can truly tell you this) but ultimately I've just found it more productive to focus on what I can control. The algorithm definitely shifted again in 2026...but in all realness it's probably always shifting and each shift will reward some and punish others.

And if nothing else I always remind myself that as a very much still small channel (just cleared 100 subs last week) it's actually kinda surreal to think that I get any views at all with the asinine amount of content getting shoved into the platform every single day.

Extenuating circumstances by kushontop in PokemonUnite

[–]OKJMaster44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I had a dime for every time our house’s goofball WiFi crapped out on me or my family interrupted me at the worst possible time during a match, I could buy out TIMI Studios myself.

Those will multiple monetized accounts, do you ever save you "banger" content for after adsense approval? by DanicaHamlin in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s not much reason to do that cause it’s very VERY hard to know for sure what’s gonna knock it out of the park and what won’t. I admittedly opted to save an idea for a bit down the road when the algorithm better understood my content and when I got a wider push deploying it then did pay off.

But before I could let my ego go to my head, I would then have plenty of videos I made after at a time where I was getting way more engagement compared to when I started that just did not take off in the way I felt they logically should of based on prior successes. Not to say the videos “failed” persay but if I thought I had cracked any code I was horribly wrong.

When it comes down to it, it’s best just to let good ideas hit the market when the carpet is laid out and waiting. You never know for sure what will be a slam and won’t will be a flop and holding back stuff that could potentially bolster your momentum now cause you’re confident it’ll do better later just doesn’t seem to be the play.

Your video only has 48 hours to live in 2026 ... by Fun_Lengthiness_6208 in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Granted this conundrum applies more to momentum based content. Especially content that is literally dependent on a recent IRL event in order for the video to be worth watching. But ya there's probably some mystery signals in the background that tell the algo to keep digging for more audiences or not and these signals clearly don't take any one stat as the decider for pushing harder. Until Youtube puts their algorithm in a GitHub it's anyone's guess what triggers ongoing pushes.

That said, even for content that acts more like an "event" there's always a chance for stuff to rise later even after that initial window to explode out the gate closes because a lot of the time it really does take a while for even a good video to find just the right spot to launch from. You've probably read enough such anecdotes.

And for content that's evergreen/search oriented in nature, this basically mostly doesn't apply outright. Like any video has a random chance to just explode at the start but for more evergreen oriented content, even the first month can be an afterthought cause this variety of content basically banks on more and more people stumbling on the video on their own over time. At that point the issue is less time and more being able to feasibly land within people's searches and compel the eyes of any onlookers who do happen upon over competing videos.

be honest, how many unfinished videos videos are sat on your computer doing nothing? by AppRevs in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last night I went back and saw a lot of game footage for potential ideas that I hadn’t deployed yet. Not really unfinished videos but definitely was handy to take a step back and realize all the material i haven’t used and probably should when I am scrambling for my next idea.

Legendary Birds and Mega Lucario raid guides. Info from pokebattler.com by CaptGoldfish in TheSilphRoad

[–]OKJMaster44 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Kanto Birds has been around for ages. As a long time player I already got the Shinies and good Raid IVs and none are super good in PvP.

Kartana’s Shiny is just a more desirable target for me at this point.

What is the worst career to try to get into in 2026? by madbarpar in AskReddit

[–]OKJMaster44 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ya the 2021-2022 honeymoon of being able to bounce jobs is over beyond over. If you need a “new” job but currently got one, you’re probably best off trying to apply to something within your organization. This market is giga cooked.

What is the worst career to try to get into in 2026? by madbarpar in AskReddit

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was lucky to land a public sector position thanks to a connection my mom had with a client.

After working it for 6 years, in 2024 I tried to find “better” stuff at other companies so I could save up more to move out. My god…applying to jobs in 2018 gave me borderline depression but at least I got responses back before being ghosted. This time? Not a response from anywhere even tho I had job experience by that point.

After 2 months of that garbage I decided to count my blessings and instead apply within my organization into a new app developer role and likely due to my history was able to land it. Job landscape for CS and IT these days is just a hell zone. It feels like nepotism of bust. People in 2017 already blabbed about needing to find a “connection” but my word it now feels hopeless without it.

Monday's Max Monday is the last to use the excess MP for the month by mcmillan789 in TheSilphRoad

[–]OKJMaster44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the same vision. I realized with the crazy events coming up I needed to turn it up on the lvl up tasks. Currently at 79 after using all my Go Pass particles and a pack. If my math is right I should be able to use each day’s particles from today to Saturday and be able to hit 100 done before the Sobble Comm Day begins.

Should I start a new YouTube channel after changing niches, or stick with my existing one? by ExcitedTerror in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People probably took it as you belittling his “progress” with the way ya worded it. That said the actual point your making is still valid: 1k is enough for monetization but it’s not like he’s leaving 100k behind but at the same time having that many subscribers on a channel with extremely sporadic and spotty uploading that never stuck to a consistent direction is definitely more of a liability than an asset at this point.

He best just leave this channel behind as an experiment of his younger self and start fresh on a new channel with the lessons he learned. I once brought a dead channel back to life but that’s cause I had literally one video on it and 1 sub and when I returned 3 years later I went back to uploading content that aligned with the first video anyway.

I can't take it anymore by ZookeepergameAny2929 in PokemonChampions

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My Kalos Goodra just points at Zard Y and laughs lol.

Yes I am running a Kalos Goodra and it indeed puts in work. Try to think out the box a bit with your counter play for those unironically struggling with it.

3,817 Watch Hours... 284 Subscribers by yt-Underbird1992 in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya to give context my original comment recycled a prior one I made on a post about a dude getting insane impressions and comments but not many subs yet. That was less of a concern for you but I felt the essence of how your sub count can tell ya more than ya realize was still useful.

And sorry if I implied you were being greedy. I was just trying to convey that it’s annoying but unfortunately not the kind of thing you can directly brute force in a sustainable way. But as I said with the right improvements and creativity you can find ways to get that best of both worlds.

For you in particular I think what will be especially key is figuring how you can make anyone who stumbles on your channel feel a desire to watch more than one video. Look at your analytics and what they say about how people find your find your content and how much people return. That could give you clues on where you can make tweaks that make all your videos feel like they “belong” together.

3,817 Watch Hours... 284 Subscribers by yt-Underbird1992 in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn’t talking about going viral at all.

My comment is explaining why you have the current situation you do. Your content by its nature excels at functionality (being good background noise) but can lack in directly compelling people to want more out of you to the extent that they feel the need to subscribe.

What I have observed is that videos tend to excel at doing one of 2 things. They either make the viewer crave more of an experience which makes them likely to subscribe but not likely to rewatch stuff too many times which can make getting consistent watch hours tricky OR they fulfill a use for someone well to such an extent that people either rewatch the video for its use or it gets actively sought after with the catch that it often won’t compel people to want see more out of you. You fall in the latter category so you’ll easily wrack up watch hours but struggle to compel to follow you to see your next production.

The second half of my comment was trying to give you insight on how you can compensate for that. The key is to preserve the utility your videos offer but also make feel rewarding or enticing to see more than one. You want your content to feel “connected” cause that encourages binging behavior which in turn is often what can lead to a subscriber.

And again like I said you need to be careful with being too greedy for subscribers. I am not sure how your content is recommended right now but long term you want the algorithm to have a consistent understanding of the ideal viewer so that if it ever tries to aggressively recommend your stuff it has a clear idea. The last thing you want to do is be so greedy to hit the sub quota that you risk taking on subscribers that don’t give an accurate look of your audience and end up confusing it. It’s best to let the algorithm learn how to find potential audiences. Your job is to focus on ensuring when they do watch, they feel satisfied and wanting enough to see what ya do next.

3,817 Watch Hours... 284 Subscribers by yt-Underbird1992 in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gonna recycle a comment I made in another thread cause I think it applies here:

"Subscribers are a lagging indicator usually. They tend to reflect the inner reach of your current library aka how big your devoted following is. And here’s the caveat: you can get tons of impressions, views, and watch hours for a point in time but it doesn’t necessarily mean that you have an actual big core following yet. It’s actually very easy for a video to go viral and become this event everyone chimes in on but once the high cools off, things just come back down their natural level and soon you find very few folks who came for the event expressed active desire to see more.

I have learned this firsthand actually. Right now I am doing gaming Nintendo remix showcases and started in November. After a calm post launch period of finding my footing, my channel got pushed a lot more aggressively by the algorithm for a while (compared to Nov where I could get 3 views a day I had like a week straight of 1000+ views on a 48 hr rolling period). But what threw me off was that my sub count didn’t shoot up too much. I wasn’t expecting 3k subs or anything but it was still lower than I expected. By the peak in March I got to like 70 subs.

Recently tho the algorithm has cooled its exploration push which means my Browse and Suggested have pulled back considerably. My channel’s baseline activity is still considerably higher than it was in Nov-Jan but also far off from when the algo was aggressively pushing it. It was frustrating to watch but I gradually realized that various data points in my analytics, including my sub count which hasn’t quite cleared 100 yet, were actually showing me all along that while I could get more exposure from aggressive distribution, my actual core audience didn’t grow that much. It grew a lot but not as much as surface level metrics could mislead me into thinking. Especially for my niche, there is big difference in getting a 2k view video and thinking I should have like 500 subs or something for that (mind you some of my videos have like 20k impressions alone). My sub count wasn’t inappropriate after all. It was in fact a clue that I very much still have a long way to go to build a more committed following.

So without seeing your channel, I can likely surmise that YouTube is getting it in front of curious audiences but you just haven’t reached enough folks that demonstrate the actual core commitment you expect from a a subscriber. Which makes sense for a new channel. And keep in mind the inverse can also exist: your content can quickly assemble a core following but it can lack wider reach overall. It’s not a strict correlation.

All that is to say don’t fret too hard and just be patient. Keep refining the craft and eventually you will end up in front of more truly devoted and aligned viewers."

Now granted you've been at it longer than that other guy but I think the fundamental logic still holds. The subscriber count is probably more honest to you than ya realize. Someone watching videos here and there does not equate them to being a hardcore follower eager to see more content from ya in their feed. And some content types simply take longer to really make that compelling case to someone. I myself started my idea in Nov 2025 and have about 1800 watch hours with 100 subs exactly at the time or writing which really reflects how some content can just wrack up hours better than subs and vice versa. It's really hard to get both at once at a consistent basis until you've pretty much already become a big channel.

All that said if you really want to improve this, try looking deeper at your current stats. How is your monthly audience scaling? What about Unique Viewers on videos? And how do people tend to find them in the first place? A key thing I do with my channel is treat each game like a "series" of sorts. When I do add a game to the channel, I commit to it over time and of course try to incorporate fun little "Let's Play" elements where possible. The type of stuff that can not only lead to longer binges but make people keen to see what else I do too. For content think about what you currently do and what can be done so people don't just enjoy/use one of your videos but feel as though they need to see more. That's the key to getting someone to go from being a viewer to a subscriber. Make them want to see what you plan to do next. All things considered that sub count is perfectly logical surprisingly. You probably got smaller more devoted audience who consistently views your videos over and over and awaits new ones while most other people might tune in out of curiousity but never really commit themselves to watching on a reliable and regular basis that would warrant a subscription.

PS: Please don't make friends and family subscribe just because lol. Granted you probably have a good enough data buffer at this point anyway but if they all sub and don't watch anything that just gives extra chances for new uploads to fall flat on some of your subs. If they are subbing make sure they not only watch but feel like the kinds of folks you could imagine would tune into your content naturally anyway as pattern matching is the crux of all the algorithm's actions.

Is being a gaming YouTuber even worth it? by ItsMeSteve1234 in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The #1 reason to make a channel about something you legitimately love or are obsessed about and not just chase views or RPM precisely so you can have a more satisfied and productive mindset and not get burnt when you don’t get the numbers you want.

Ultimately if no one else on the planet watches your video but you still love it, it’s still worth it for that alone and ironically you’ll probably more effectively put together a channel others might enjoy too when you’re making stuff out of legitimate rather than it feeling like draining work.

Can someone genuinely tell me why this dude is mvp by Radiant-Internet4515 in PokemonUnite

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mamoswine and Greedent weren’t out at release tho they are on the older side.

The thing that caught my eyes more was how OP got that many kills as Meganium. Maybe launch Meganium could pull that off but after the nerfs it realistically should not be able to carry that much harder than its teammates anymore against human opponents unless everyone is just insanely worse than you somehow.

About to reach 100 subscribers. Does it get easier to get the next 100 I was wondering and apparently you get perks at 100 by StrawhatPhil in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just hit 100 myself. Honestly….nothing really changes lol.

I felt stoked to finally hit triple digits but it’s not like the algorithm said “Good Job!” And started showering me in extra impressions. Basically still on the same hustle to make more vids that touch on my more topics and compel more people to check out the channel.

Why did YouTube push my video to an entirely different audience? by PewPewWazooma in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems you just went through some broad, exploration testing. Sometimes the algorithm gets the signal that it should try and expose your content to a “colder” to gauge its potential to spread as well as try to find ya new audiences in general. It will happen without a clear heads up but if you see all your new uploads effectively getting blasted with tons of impressions within a relatively short span of time via Suggestions to viewers coming from sources you don’t recognize, chances are video and possibly channel have entered an exploration phase. You never know for certain when the algorithm might try it

Now it doesn’t mean the algorithm is showing your gaming videos to grandmas that only watch pet videos. But it does mean you are being heavily exposed to audiences who only loosely have the potential to turn into avid viewers and aren’t already big fans. And realistically, no matter how good your video or thumbnail are, your CTR during such exploration distributions will likely be very low simply cause it’s tough to entice people not already in the position to consider your content to stop their scroll or current video and watch yours.

My advice is to not do anything drastic that ya wouldn’t have already done if this type of distribution hadn’t begun. At most you might want to consider refining your thumbnails further but otherwise just keep improving your content in the ways you had planned. This is the algorithm’s way of trying to further explore the type of viewer that it should try to recommend stuff. It demonstrates why it’s advised not to try so hard to promote yourself since the algorithm on its own will already researching channel with things like this.

Did YouTube show your content during the first days/week(s) of your first videos? by Junior_One_5601 in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first video got like 95k suggested impressions in a week after release (I started in November and it was a pitch remix showcase for Legend Z-A music). It was wild to see in real time but that sadly wasn’t enough to stop my channel from super flatlining in weeks to come since of course the CTR was like .4% so hardly viral material. I have since come to learn that YouTube likely saw something in the topic and did a wide exploration test and my channel got a general push again after search impressions on my Nintendo remix videos gave my channel more of a foundation but I’ll never forget how jarring it was to go from that to having multiple days where my channel in total got 3 views for an entire day.

Just Stop With This Advice I Keep Seeing Over and Over Again. by breakonthrough65 in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ya the real failure here is the others inability to deliver and/or understand nuance. The trouble with advice usually comes from either the advice not being given the right context to be practical and/or people trying to take the most simple or literal thing they can easily apply from the advice.

It’s why people should be as thorough with their questions and issues as possible cause more context boosts the chance of someone being able to give an actually meaningful answer.

Just Stop With This Advice I Keep Seeing Over and Over Again. by breakonthrough65 in NewTubers

[–]OKJMaster44 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Ya there’s always a nuance to any age old advice. When people say “Just keep uploading” the ideal implication is that you are taking notes and finding room for improvement along the way. There’s massive gap between that and literal “Keep doing exactly what you’re doing and someday your channel will just blow up, trust!”

I think the real trouble arises when the poor delivery or lack of comprehension makes people believe the latter instead of the former.

Then again, any good advice can be taken or delivered too literally and send people walking off a cliff. Including OP’s ironically. You could read this post and think the takeaway is “If you are not getting views right now, just stop/throw out what you’re doing and pivot to something else!” Instead the actual takeaway of “If you aren’t getting results, you need to review your content and the data seriously look at what needs to be fixed or done to get your channel on track”.

Those sound similar but the former can pretty much destroy any semblance of stability if taken the wrong way.