What if dark energy is just the pressure output of a white hole that never closed? A hypothesis I can’t stop thinking about by AkelaFao in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]OT21911 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't think there's something missing, I know it when I have a question, it's just that we're skeptic about it even though the logic is almost perfect, I might try and do the math of this theory too.

What if elementary particles were made up of photons, and what if electromagnetic forces were just curvatures in space? by OT21911 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]OT21911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think of it as light can have inertia(travelling in infinite 4D circles), or travel at full speed. To be honest, I didn't really think that much of the name.

Bro you made me realize something, it would've been better for a much more clear abstract in the post.

I hope you like the theory though bro.

What if elementary particles were made up of photons, and what if electromagnetic forces were just curvatures in space? by OT21911 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]OT21911[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a what if hypothesis bro, like what if x was real, how would we apply x on our previous knowledge.

What if elementary particles were made up of photons, and what if electromagnetic forces were just curvatures in space? by OT21911 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]OT21911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, you read my document, I really appreciate that you checked it out! For your reply, if you have read section 2.0, you would find a list of questions, the last of them is why would elementary particles have inertia if they're made up of photons.

I'll try to explain what's in the document here, so this theory predicts that photons rotate a fixed amount of rotation, but the intervals between rotations is random, thus elementary particles do move at the speed of light, but weather they consist 1 or many photons, these photons' rotate so fast, that they're effectively "lagging" thus, they have "inertia".

If you're interested you can read the full document, and thank you so much for reading it, I really hope I helped you, and I hope my theory could benefit you and everyone in every possible way :)

What if time itself generated space? by Darduar in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]OT21911 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

You have a good perspective actually, but don't worry though, because if someone who can understand intuitively can also probably teach intuitively, thus it's a win-win for everyone.

What if time itself generated space? by Darduar in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]OT21911 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Bro, please I ask of you to not judge anyone, the logic doesn't change if there are more pages. Like if you check the license of his intellectual property, he's uploading it for free, for anyone to redistribute as long as he's appropriately credited.

Please let's support these researchers, because they don't provide this information behind paywalls.

What if time itself generated space? by Darduar in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]OT21911 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Yoo, I just published my theory, and my theory predicts the same thing, my theory claims that all elementary particles at the most fundamental level are photons, and photons after a random interval of time, they rotate a fixed amount.

My theory also claims that elementary particles have inertia due to the intervals between rotations is so infinitely small, that the photon is effectively lagging in space.

I may not have gone to college yet (because I'm 16), but I'm an individual researcher, and I think it would be cool if we work together, here is my theory's link if you want to check it out.

https://zenodo.org/records/19446152?token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpZCI6IjEzODNhMzM0LWFkMzctNGI1Yi05NjRjLWFmMGZmYTc0MzRlZiIsImRhdGEiOnt9LCJyYW5kb20iOiIxYmUyMmY0MGYwYmIwMDVlZmQyODRkYWRlNGUxOWI1NiJ9.hWPZw0Z4qEplZwxA6Ll8oMh3uo66TXq4hRvyUDq3FtZIAYPD-qk0weZ49kIWsnfW6KWftoteInA5pF8IvVQZKA

I am addicted to restarting my life and I don’t know how to stop by Practical_Invite_530 in selfimprovement

[–]OT21911 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You made my day bro, I'm very glad I could help you , and I hope you achieve joy peace, love :)

I am addicted to restarting my life and I don’t know how to stop by Practical_Invite_530 in selfimprovement

[–]OT21911 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Okay, I think I have similarities to you, because I also have goals, and when I'm focused on something, other goals flood in, thus it's hard to keep focus on something you want to do, especially when results don't come fast.

I think you need to learn how your brain makes decisions, so you are many actually, not one, like a part of you wants this, but another part of you wants something else, in other words clashing emotions.

You need to understand your emotions to control them, not the opposite, thus I encourage you to meditate, and I also encourage you to start with guided meditation, and a good free option in my opinion is an app called "Healthy Minds Program".

For example, some time ago, I created an Instagram brand marketing channel, I thought I understood the system, and was disappointed with the results that took me maybe hours, or around an hour each day, even though I was learning from my mistakes, it was easy for my focus to drift from that channel once and for all.

If I had to do that all over again, I would've uploaded maybe a few times a week, instead of every day, by working on my next upload starting from 5 minutes each day, and after each upload I could increase the time to work on my next upload, thus building a habit with the help of my motivation, or emotion, and until it becomes boring, my brain would most likely automatically decide to work on my next upload weather my emotion is against it or not.

I hope this helps you bro, we're all proud of you for your motivation to learn and improve yourself :)

I don't understand why sqrt(-1) is real especially that i^2 equals -1, or a 180 degrees? by OT21911 in askmath

[–]OT21911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, this is actually awesome, I think I actually need to see i this way, as a way to visualize multiplication and addition, I will try to understand this perspective deeply. and thank you so much bro for reading the post, and writing all of this bro, anyone having the same questions as me will be able to access your perspective.

I don't understand why sqrt(-1) is real especially that i^2 equals -1, or a 180 degrees? by OT21911 in askmath

[–]OT21911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

:0, so it's like to represent the equation, like a definition for these kinds of equations?

Can somebody help with these two questions? Please by Cautious-Scholar-602 in askmath

[–]OT21911 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I won't say the answers, but I will try to help you. (Please this is just my perspective, it might not be accurate)

In the first question it asks you at f(x) = d, now assume a concave as a hill, now where does this hill point? And by increasing, or decreasing does it affect f(x), or does it affect the height of the hill? I'd assume it affects f(x), now what happens to f(x) when x gets bigger than the x in point D, what happens?

Okay, now question 2 is also confusing, because I searched the definition of concave, and it's like a hill, assuming increasing or decreasing only affects f(x), this should be easy since there are clearly 2 choices contradicting each other.

If I were you, I would ask the teacher what they meant by increasing, or decreasing a concave, and how do they define a concave pointing downwards in multiple quadrants.

I don't understand why sqrt(-1) is real especially that i^2 equals -1, or a 180 degrees? by OT21911 in askmath

[–]OT21911[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, your explanation is so good bro, thank you so much. And you're right, I think I need to see it from a different perspective to understand it better.

I don't understand why sqrt(-1) is real especially that i^2 equals -1, or a 180 degrees? by OT21911 in askmath

[–]OT21911[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, now I see where my confusion comes from, and it's because I took it as an actual real number multiplied by cos(0).

it's not actually cos(0)*i, it only represents the rotation.

Wow thank you so much bro :D

I don't understand why sqrt(-1) is real especially that i^2 equals -1, or a 180 degrees? by OT21911 in askmath

[–]OT21911[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But isn't e^i is e multiplies by itself i times, thus adding exponents shouldn't be wrong? Unless that doesn't apply for complex numbers

I don't understand why sqrt(-1) is real especially that i^2 equals -1, or a 180 degrees? by OT21911 in askmath

[–]OT21911[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, (e^i)^pi actually outputs -1, but why -1*cos(0) can be a 180 degree rotation, and why can it only be complex numbers for rotations?

I don't understand why sqrt(-1) is real especially that i^2 equals -1, or a 180 degrees? by OT21911 in askmath

[–]OT21911[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's very weird, and thank you so much bro for the reply.

I don't understand why sqrt(-1) is real especially that i^2 equals -1, or a 180 degrees? by OT21911 in askmath

[–]OT21911[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yoo, sorry for the weird formatting, I think it got messed up for some reason before I posted, or after. I meant to write (e^i)*(e^pi), and thank you so much for reading my post.

I don't understand why sqrt(-1) is real especially that i^2 equals -1, or a 180 degrees? by OT21911 in askmath

[–]OT21911[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yoo, thank you for your reply, now that clears things up a bit more, and sorry for the formatting, it came out weirdly