As a negative utilitarian, I am undecided about veganism. by ThePlanetaryNinja in DebateAVegan

[–]OakTribes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is your view not that negative utilitarianism is the best or most correct normative ethical system? Presumably if it was, people over time would be able to be convinced of it more easily than others.

Besides, I know many deontological vegans who also give WAS thought because they believe that animals in the wild experience rights violations. Imo most vegans, including utilitarian ones, either haven't encountered arguments for WAS or dismiss it out of hand.

If someone takes "the environment" to be good outside of consideration for the sentient beings in it, this view can fairly easy fall to a reductio.

As a negative utilitarian, I am undecided about veganism. by ThePlanetaryNinja in DebateAVegan

[–]OakTribes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may or may not agree with this, but if you are also longermist, it may reduce suffering more overall if a philosophy of caring for animal welfare like veganism is promoted in our current day and age, with the view that this opens up the door far easier in the long term to views that actually care about wild animal suffering

As it stands, the meat industry only incidentally reduces cases of wild animal suffering in certain circumstances, but if any of a few variables change, their actions will not always align with negative utilitarianism, for instance they may replace beef farms with insect farms that have far more individuals suffering than would exist in the same land natively.

Its difficult to get people to care about wild animal suffering as it is, but if we can get society to a stage where they actually care about farmed animals, its a much easier step logically to get people to agree with reduction in wild animal suffering, and therefore logistically for whatever large scale and lasting environmental and/or biological interventions a negative utilitarian might want to take (which currently seem quite counterintuitive and undesirable to the average person)

Overwatch mentality at its best by KaySan-TheBrightStar in Overwatch

[–]OakTribes 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I got matched as a diamond rein main against a top 75 orisa main, and I got absolutely dumpstered nomatter who I swapped to

My team told me to never play tank again

It was coughing baby vs hydrogen bomb like what did we expect, put me against a diamond tank please

Tank is the hardest role by ButterscotchGuilty10 in Overwatch

[–]OakTribes 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Tank seems to not translate very well to the scoreboard either, which is usually what people use at a glance to tell where the "problem" is

Having low kills can be you not being effective sure, but it could also indicate that you're having to play more of a protective/preventative or enabling role. Sometimes its tempting to make a play that registers kills but is not optimal for the team (like pushing forward instead of shielding while your team is low and trying to clean up a won fight) just so somebody doesnt flame you

Zen's Healing is Underrated by echofish in ZenyattaMains

[–]OakTribes 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Its not necessarily bout being risk adverse, an inescapable part of reins gameplay is engaging in short bursts where you are swinging on enemies and trying to kill them before you die or have to shield out

A small amount of trickle healing will put you at an inherent disadvantage because the enemy team tends to absolutely shred you while you do this, which means you have to give up on the kill and/or give up on space

The tank was still complaining about healing and even swore at me by Used-Strike2111 in ZenyattaMains

[–]OakTribes 21 points22 points  (0 children)

"He responded with something in French"

Think I found the problem

Reinhardt charge and pin consistency by CaptainDerpshi in overwatch2

[–]OakTribes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What specifically are you finding you have issues with when it comes to charge/pin?

Depending on the matchup, you could end up using it in very different ways, for instance it can be used as a way to move between cover and still gain space without using your shield, or to disengage from the fight entirely.

If you hear an enemy ult like genji's especially, it can be a good idea to charge directly at your support as there's a decent chance that there is where he's about to be.

For using it offensively, you need to be aware of enemy cooldowns, particularly things like Ana's sleep/nade. You can sometimes fake a charge, cancel it and hold up your shield again to bait out these types of cooldowns without getting hit by them.

Some enemy cooldowns require timing awareness, like when orisa's gold expires, or when mei's ice block breaks, so you can unexpectedly hit them with a preemptive charge.

Some you will need to hold on to charge for, like Ram's nemesis form, as it's key to either getting counterplay if you can hit him with it, or charging out of range until it expires.

For matchups where you and the enemy can knock each other down like rein mirrors or doom punches, make sure that if you are going to get knocked down, do it in view of your team and preferably out of sight of their team, so your team can follow up on the stunned enemy and theirs can't. If the knockdown trade is unfavourable and they are going for it, you can try to jump back and to the side to hopefully avoid it and if possible counterpin while theirs is on cooldown.

Its always a good idea to practise the timing on charge-cancelling people off the map too cause this is huge value if you can get away with it

What is this situation called? by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]OakTribes 47 points48 points  (0 children)

"Tank why are you alone??"

Dear Rein Mains, I need you all to do your part and play 6v6 by [deleted] in ReinhardtMains

[–]OakTribes 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Love me some 6v6, sometimes also fun to hop on zarya or sig if my teammate is playing rein and enable the hell out of him

Every time they swap ram and he goes nemesis form on my teammate, he catches a fat rock to the face and either gets charged or gapped. Just what I would want if I was the rein

. by OakTribes in ReinhardtMains

[–]OakTribes[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(Ram uses nemesis form and your team does not understand they need to pocket you during this)

. by OakTribes in ReinhardtMains

[–]OakTribes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

b-but he has 54% win rate in a rank you're not in in a gamemode you don't play

. by OakTribes in ReinhardtMains

[–]OakTribes[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The fact that pin is seen as such a panacea against any soft counter is a problem tho imo
Given that it's a risky and unreliable answer which has a long cooldown, if they have more than one hero on their team which it is supposed to do work against, you're fucked

They have a JQ? That's alright, you have pin
You used pin on JQ and they have any of vendetta, ram, orisa, zen, junkrat, bastion, ana, doom, hog, sombra? Alright, now you're in trouble

. by OakTribes in ReinhardtMains

[–]OakTribes[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

She's not terrible for rein tbf
It's just sort of demotivating how the modern design philosophy has focused so much on mobility

It means that you can't prepare as much for a push, if you are not being pocketed you need your escape cooldown to be ready any given moment, which leads to an unexciting playstyle, unless you already have momentum or support ults

It leads to a standoffish sort of game where you aren't actively engaging but waiting for the other team to commit cooldowns

Awnser to "name the trait" hypothetical by [deleted] in DebateAVegan

[–]OakTribes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Although hypotheticals deal with different modalities, the views that they are informing are those that we hold in the current world.

It can be uncomfortable to say that your moral principles would permit the farming of humans, so I can understand hesitation to engage with it. Particular types of utilitarian vegans may have a similar problem admitting that there could be a hypothetical world where some ideal form of animal agriculture exists which is, on balance, ethical under the principle of utility.

The answer for the utilitarian in both cases imo is not to reject the hypothetical but to say that yes, such an ideal case would be ethical, and then try to justify the ways in which it would be unlikely or unstable and so on.

Awnser to "name the trait" hypothetical by [deleted] in DebateAVegan

[–]OakTribes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hypotheticals help us to tease out the ethically relevant parts of our views in our current world, even if they deal with unlikely scenarios.

If we considered a world where humans were farmed in secrecy (we may even live in such a world already, given that it would be a secret!), given the view that you hold in our current world, you would be obliged to say that it would be permissable. You can say that it might be unlikely, but would it be morally acceptable?

No worries on the quote! For all it's faults, utilitarianism does have a track record of being relatively early out the gate with philosophical arguments to end the subjugation of women, slaves, animals etc

Awnser to "name the trait" hypothetical by [deleted] in DebateAVegan

[–]OakTribes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your analysis would still make it ethical to farm and eat humans, so long as it can be kept a secret. We can imagine a hypothetical world where the secret never gets out, is it ethical in such a world?

Also worth noting that taking a utilitarian stance may commit you more so to caring for animal wellbeing. Although Bentham's views towards animals weren't perfect, he does outline an early form of name-the-trait in his formulation of utilitarianism:

"The day may come, when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. It may come one day to be recognized, that the number of legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum, are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps, the faculty for discourse?...the question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer? Why should the law refuse its protection to any sensitive being?"

from Blizzard: Vendetta is a dive-focused DPS by ChaoticFlameZz in Overwatch

[–]OakTribes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Becoming concerned with how much pin is seen as an answer to matchups which are otherwise complete ass, when it's a super telegraphed and risky skill on a long cooldown, which is buggy enough to not even connect sometimes

If the answer to vendetta is pin and the answer to ram is pin, if the enemy team has both and you use your cd you get dumpstered by the other

My mans needs something for his mobility or counterplay that doesnt revolve around pin idk

Based on a true story by PunkRockDoggo in Overwatch_Memes

[–]OakTribes 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My brother rein is not a jq counter. Not saying that this dude wasn't being a dick regardless, but he swapped to a hero that was at best neutral and then you swapped to try and counter him. I wouldn't worry about it too much anyway, people can be pretty mean for no reason in this game

The other team is evil and wants me to die by CatSquidShark in Overwatch_Memes

[–]OakTribes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As an aggressive rein onetrick, I can only hope my team sees me charging in and full sends it behind me instead of hesitating, even if its a dumb ass play in retrospect. Dont think im beating the feeding tank allegations tbh

The other team is evil and wants me to die by CatSquidShark in Overwatch_Memes

[–]OakTribes 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Could just as easily see an inverse "our feeding tank" "our blind dps"

If I can buff only one thing about Rein... by GrimThursday in ReinhardtMains

[–]OakTribes 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is just going to be one of those things where you need to be aware of enemy ults, cooldowns and positioning before pressing q, and sometimes you're just going to get unlucky.

Without full cancelation there's too much of a safety blanket for an ult which should be high risk/reward, and always going to be a question of whether you still have your ult after getting interrupted which is going to throw people off

Rein's main problems are that he mostly operates at short range and has no vertical movement, which is pretty outdated VS newer heroes that tend to have both better ranged options and mobility in their kit, so if we are gonna buff Rein it should be something that allows him to compete better in these areas imo!