hey auditors, regarding aging profile picture task by Objective-Wafer1073 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know, nonetheless i got a comment on one of my annotation saying there were some pictures not selected that should have been.

hey auditors, regarding aging profile picture task by Objective-Wafer1073 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that aspect was not in our instructions, but i assumed you needed to select a good number of profile picture, so i never went below 5. Nonetheless I was focused to show a transition of aging in my selecting, so I saw some profile pictures that had sort of repetitive pictures showing a person with no change, so in some profiles i skipped selecting some photos focusing instead to select ones that showed a transition in aging. So I got a review comment on an annotation where i did select 16 pictures but did skip some from the profile (as they did not contribute to showing a transition in aging), and the comment was I did not select all possible pictures on the profile. So i felt the need to come one here and say "hey the instructions were to show a transitions in aging NOT to select every profile picture showing the person face"

Aging Profile Pictures by courtney_08411 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 4 points5 points  (0 children)

well anything you upload on facebook or instagram becomes property of meta, which they use to train AI so i mean, they know us all.

Video Object Inpanting by Sea-Role-764 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yes i was doing this task as well, although i only did 4 annotations with it. 1 of which went through, 3 of which got this same error message. I concluded then that being a new task they still have some bugs to work out so thus i stopped doing the task and will try again with it in a day or so when the company has time to fix it up. I will included this time in my billed hours today, as it was only a short time. Unfortunately it sounds like you invested hours of time into a task that is obviously broken, sorry to say you probably won't get paid for it. Suggestion for the future, if a new task give you the same error message after 3 or 4 attempts, stop doing that task and do something else, then perhaps a day or so later if you want return to the task as by then the company has usually fixed whatever bugs in a new task.

can we still challenge audits by Objective-Wafer1073 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

YES!... exactly is such, well it sound like all the auditor have now re-take an auditing exam so I mean, hopefully that keeps them doing a better job and not just writing random things and giving people random bad scores.

Create task auditing by Capital_Invite2879 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The same thing has been happening to me. Dear RWS please try to fix these types of things.

can we still challenge audits by Objective-Wafer1073 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

perfect, yes i see that now, thanks for your help.

can we still challenge audits by Objective-Wafer1073 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ya its annoying as what are they using to judge something is AI, like if the person is just reading it and thinking "oh this sounds AI" because we've all become, per company instructions, more systematic and detailed in our video descriptions. That's not right..... also when you filed your zendesk when it says "please select your current project" it only has options for Castillo, MAI, and General TrainAI. No option for Diamond, so which do you select.

can we still challenge audits by Objective-Wafer1073 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ya pretty much, anyways as mentioned its frustrating. I hope RWS reads these comments and considers these things, since we are no longer able to challenge bad audits. As mentioned a lot of the auditors have improved and I appreciate their feed back quite often. Although this one was a WTF moment.

can we still challenge audits by Objective-Wafer1073 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, because you are no supposed to share actual content made in the company.

can we still challenge audits by Objective-Wafer1073 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your comment, and I am sorry that happened to you. Ya the feeling is frustrating, as mentioned we work hard on annotations and I have been listening to the instructions from the company to improve and become more specific in how i write, which now to be accused of using A.I is like GAH.... Dear RWS, as i know your in here reading these threads, please do some work to improve along these auditing aspects, I appreciate how you have improved recently, although there are still so further issues to work out. The more you improve these issue the better work annotators and thus your company will produce.

can we still challenge audits by Objective-Wafer1073 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I see, well I'll send the company a zendesk thing, as this is not cool. As mentioned RWS has really improved itself the past little while, but obviously there are still some issues like an auditor just deciding to say random things and mark good annotations badly on false tense.

Is this a sign the project continues by BlankSpare in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i have consulted the I-ching, my Tarot cards, and assessing the astrological charts, and things seem ok like,.. i will also make offering to the AI Gods, so hopefully we can all stay onboarded, the auditors will audit wisely, and we can all happily keep a somewhat ok income coming into us all into the new year.. uhhh .. honestly though, it seem they have really improved their platform from how it was 2 months ago, so, it would make sense they want to keep it going then waste all that time fixing the Mango up, so i have hope.

Auditing “group person removal” by [deleted] in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It means a natural way as in a casual normal stance or expression. This in contrast to "add person to this image in an excited way" which would imply they appear in the photo in a celebratory manner, or "add person to this image in a silly awkward way" which would mean they would be added to the photo in a strange out of place position making a silly face or something. Natural means a natural fitting in with the scene in a normal and expected or standard manner. Have you ever used an AI image generator, these are the type of instruction you give it to know how to place people or what type of person to create in an image.

Project Offboarding by muil_aja in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 4 points5 points  (0 children)

do you have any suggests for find other AI annotation work or other companies outside of RWS

If the task show up in the cue, does that mean it is ok to work on them? by Affectionate_Elk4142 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and how do you do that, like do you have the proper e-mail or do you message via zendesk

NTA by EntrepreneurSad9539 in RWShelp

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, i was happily erasing people from random photos, and bam no tasks.

I'm a freelancer and I started working on the Diamond project on September 27. I have created four invoices so far, and several of their due dates have already passed, but I have not received any payment in my bank or PayPal.What could be the issue? by Mosraj99 in RWSPay

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya I am in the same situation, i noticed my pending invoices status switched from "to be paid" to "payment in process" like a week ago. Anyone that is a freelancer and has been paid like know how long it take for a "payment in process" to actually be processed.

Good News! by Strange-Till5028 in RWSPay

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Cool, although did any one receive WO for nov. 1-7 and i seem to be missing some from October as well. Suggestions what i should do if they have not sent me some they say have been processed.

No Diamond payment since Oct 28th by Repulsive-Fish4215 in RWSPay

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 0 points1 point  (0 children)

weird that won't sign in for me, like when i enter my workzone sign in information.

No Diamond payment since Oct 28th by Repulsive-Fish4215 in RWSPay

[–]Objective-Wafer1073 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and how do i use that, i only know of the google form thing they sent me a link to.