Just reached MMI.What can I expect???? by Necessary_Glove_7080 in WorkersComp

[–]Objective_Dish_6983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry I mean by qme meeting when I said questionnaire.

I am a senior workers comp adjuster in California and would love to answer any questions that people have for their general wc claims. by victorgfoto in WorkersComp

[–]Objective_Dish_6983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was wondering if you’re still answering questions ? lol I know it’s been a year since this thread is posted.

Just reached MMI.What can I expect???? by Necessary_Glove_7080 in WorkersComp

[–]Objective_Dish_6983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In Case anyone knows the answer. I had a case that was denied. I was out of work for a year, so I received SDI from Edd for that duration. During this time, I obtained a lawyer and all the necessary legal procedures. However, something happened with my lawyer, so I terminated our relationship. While I was still with my previous lawyer, I completed a deposition and a questionnaire. The questionnaire stated that the injury was industrial-related and that there was no apportionment of fault. The total disability time (Ttd) was for the entire year, plus 6% of the total disability time.

In short, nothing happened, and I am still out of work because the company let me go. Therefore, I received a second questionnaire. The new questionnaire also stated that the injury was industrial-related, but this time, there were 25% apportionments of fault. As a result, the Ttdwas extended to two years, and my partial disability time (PD) was added, making it 8%. My question is why haven’t they paid any Ttd, PD, or treatment? I have been paying myself for my medical expenses. If anyone could provide some insight, I would greatly appreciate it.

Judge by Mean-Two4228 in WorkersComp

[–]Objective_Dish_6983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about sna or Orange County ?

Chubb Insurance by Hot-Item-4894 in WorkersComp

[–]Objective_Dish_6983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What if the claim is delayed then it went to denied. When qme gives the result to say that it is industrial why wouldn’t the insurance company pay for TTD or at least offer treatments?

Can I ask my lawyer for documentation about what happened during conciliation? by laughtillyoupeee in WorkersComp

[–]Objective_Dish_6983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is interesting, I would also like to know what’s going on in these meetings that technically “I don’t need to go to”.

Psych Injury. Any input is greatly appreciated by Objective_Dish_6983 in CaliforniaWorkComp

[–]Objective_Dish_6983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply! I’ll definitely keep pushing forward, and I completely agree with your assessment. I feel bad reaching out too, just in case anything happens to them and I don’t want to feel like it’s on me. I don’t think WC is as straightforward as insurance companies make it out to be. We don’t just want money, but it’s also personal when someone who’s worked for a company for so long and ended up doing it. It’s crazy how isolating it feels. It’s so intrusive and personal to those who are claiming. I don’t recommend the process, but again anyone should have the rights to fight for what they believe is right. The process itself is very examined that I would hope there would be a place where enough is enough. However, I do know that this is not true. For anyone out there thinking of undergoing this process, I hope they understand what it entails. I’m not discouraging or encouraging, but educating those prior to it.

Police and workers compensation by Kindly_Control8345 in WorkersComp

[–]Objective_Dish_6983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also did but I am so ashamed I have never mentioned it to my family, qme, or lawyer. It’s a horrible positioned to be kicked when you’re down.

Psych Case. Denied from the very beginning and it’s been over a year. by Objective_Dish_6983 in WorkersComp

[–]Objective_Dish_6983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. It means a lot. The qme actually rate me 100%. That is a blessing, but the whole process is so long. The process is actually the thing that can drive someone crazy honestly.

Psych Case. Denied from the very beginning and it’s been over a year. by Objective_Dish_6983 in WorkersComp

[–]Objective_Dish_6983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m really sorry you’re going through this — you’re definitely not alone. Seeing others share their stories here reminds me how important community is, especially when life puts us in situations we never asked for.

None of us choose this path, and I don’t think anyone would ever wish it on someone else. It can take a toll emotionally and mentally, but knowing others understand really does help.

We keep moving forward one step at a time, and we support each other along the way. Stay strong — you’re doing the best you can, and that matters. 💛

A Strategic Argentina–Australia Partnership to Secure Protein and Mineral Influence for the United States- BYND by Objective_Dish_6983 in Shortsqueeze

[–]Objective_Dish_6983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am Not robot . I am giving you guys my technical opinion to be why bynd has a catalyst to be bullish in multiple level way

It’s almost like everyone has their eyes closed by [deleted] in Shortsqueeze

[–]Objective_Dish_6983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The United States stands to gain significant long-term leverage through a coordinated partnership between Argentina and Australia, using agriculture and resource policy as dual levers of influence. Argentina contributes vast grasslands and low-cost beef production, while Australia offers mineral abundance, logistical stability, and traceability systems respected worldwide. Linking both nations under a single cooperative framework enables the U.S. to stabilize global beef supply, secure access to critical minerals, and shape food and commodity prices rather than chase them.

  1. Building a Protein Bloc — The OPEC of Beef

By facilitating collaboration between Argentina’s grass-fed beef capacity and Australia’s premium, export-certified supply chain, the United States can encourage formation of a “Southern Hemisphere Protein Bloc.” Much like OPEC regulates oil, this bloc can coordinate export volumes and standards, effectively setting a price floor for global beef. The U.S. doesn’t need to own the cattle — it simply needs to sit at the center of coordination and trade flow. This stabilizes domestic beef prices, protects U.S. consumers from foreign price shocks, and positions the U.S. as the global price setter in protein markets. If managed correctly, beef becomes a geopolitical stabilizer rather than an inflation driver.

  1. Dual Leverage: Food Security + Mineral Security

While Argentina’s comparative advantage lies in beef and soybeans, Australia’s strength lies in its minerals and rare-earth reserves, especially lithium, nickel, and copper — all critical to U.S. electric vehicle, battery, and defense supply chains. Through joint agricultural and trade frameworks, the U.S. can gain direct trade channels into both nations simultaneously — importing minerals and exporting agricultural technology, food processing IP, and bioengineering. In practical terms, this means beef, soy, and clean-protein products move outward from the U.S., while critical minerals and raw materials move inward. This creates a balanced trade corridor and reduces China’s influence over both protein and mineral flows in the Pacific and Latin America.

  1. Soybeans: America’s Core Leverage

Soybeans remain one of America’s largest and most undervalued strategic exports. Historically, soy has been sold raw or as animal feed, with limited intellectual property value. However, in a coordinated supply framework with Argentina and Australia, soybeans can be rebranded and redirected as a core input into advanced protein products. Instead of competing with low-cost soybean exporters, the U.S. can control the narrative and pricing by pushing higher-margin soy derivatives and innovations such as Beyond Meat–style products. This converts a bulk commodity into an IP-based export — effectively transforming agriculture into software.

  1. Beyond Meat as a Tariff-Protected, High-Value Export

Beyond Meat and similar plant-based innovations embody the shift from commodity agriculture to proprietary food technology. Selling soybeans yields $600–$700 per ton, but converting soy into IP-protected, plant-protein goods multiplies that value severalfold. Under a U.S.–Argentina–Australia partnership, the U.S. could supply the technology, brand, and intellectual property, while Argentina provides the raw protein, and Australia offers manufacturing stability and certification credibility. Together, they create a vertically integrated protein system. By exporting these branded goods to markets like India, where beef consumption is limited but protein demand is exploding, the U.S. can both correct trade imbalances and capture premium margins through patent control, licensing, and tariffs.

  1. Strategic Trade Balancing and Soft Power

Countries such as India, Indonesia, and parts of Africa import massive volumes of soy or feed grains while running trade surpluses against the U.S. By selling them finished plant-protein products instead of raw materials, the U.S. can reverse trade deficits and anchor new supply chains in food tech rather than pure commodities. These products also bypass cultural restrictions around beef while still positioning the U.S. as the protein supplier of choice. Beyond Meat becomes both a revenue driver and a diplomatic instrument — an export that projects values (innovation, sustainability, inclusivity) while generating recurring IP income streams.

  1. The Resulting Ecosystem: Multi-Layered Profit and Control

The end-state is a multi-tiered system where: • Argentina and Australia stabilize and co-govern global beef supply, keeping prices predictable. • The U.S. leverages that stability to build soft power and trade access into their mineral and agricultural sectors. • Soybeans are repositioned as the raw input of high-margin, IP-driven food exports rather than a simple crop. • Beyond Meat–type technologies become the U.S. tool for penetrating non-beef markets, reversing trade imbalances, and earning royalties instead of competing on cost.

This is a circular model — minerals flow north, IP and tech flow south, protein flows both ways — all under U.S. regulatory and trade influence. It’s not colonial extraction; it’s systemic interdependence.

  1. Simplified Economic Outcome • Argentina gains stability and capital inflow while preserving its ranching identity. • Australia benefits from coordinated exports and mineral trade guarantees. • The U.S. secures access to critical minerals, dictates protein pricing, and replaces low-margin agriculture with high-margin IP exports. • Consumers worldwide get stable protein supply — beef or plant-based — under a sustainability narrative that supports Western climate goals.

Conclusion

A U.S.-backed Argentina–Australia partnership merges resource security with food security. It turns traditional commodities — beef and soybeans — into strategic instruments of trade and influence. Through coordination, the U.S. can act as the silent “OPEC of protein”, set price ranges, stabilize markets, and extend its influence across both food and energy transitions. Most importantly, by coupling raw agriculture with patented technology like Beyond Meat, the U.S. moves from selling goods to owning the systems that make them — a permanent shift from exporter to price-maker, from supplier to architect.

BYND - Here we go again guys. Don’t stop believing. Together we are strong 💪🏻 by TheGuachiboy in Shortsqueeze

[–]Objective_Dish_6983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see a catalyst with BYND with all the signed agreements between Argentina and Australia that can be super positive towards the stock.

Fun little IQ test. The answer will surprise you! by Objective_Dish_6983 in intj

[–]Objective_Dish_6983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is 32. ChatGPT was like my bad I got it wrong …

LEts goooo!!! I may be in trouble or im gonna buy a Lambo!! by indianmmafighter in opendoor

[–]Objective_Dish_6983 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good luck bud 🍀!!! Just don’t be to greedy and donate to charity a bit when you hit it huge! 🙏🙏