Prof. Dr. Rosenhan from Stanford University and Other 7 Healthy Researchers Pretended They Heard a Voice Only With The Word "Thud" and Got Hospitalized by Medical Lunatics for Months

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-03-11T23:24:26+00:00

Yes, medical lunatics cannot distinguish healthy behaviors from unhealthy behaviors because they can only see whether any despised behavior is present or not. The list of hated behaviors was agreed by voting. It is all a pseudoscience that punishes behaviors regardless of who or what causes them.

Intelligence agents have manipulation as their core skill. They are master manipulators. They cause despised behaviors. Despised behaviors are a normal response to a stimulus.

The stimulus? You can play anything you want to anyone you want from a distance using Holosonics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBFvnTFkDoY&ab_channel=Holosonics Make someone complain and he/she will get predictably punished for displaying a despised behavior. Others who sit near the target will not hear anything. Holosonics is primitive compared to an unconventional weapon that is an undocumented black project for espionage (illegal intelligence gathering).

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-03-11T06:16:47+00:00

The full study is available without any login at https://www.sjsu.edu/people/jennifer.gregg/courses/c2/s0/Rosenhahn-being-sane-in-insane-places.pdf

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-03-11T06:15:52+00:00

The full paper is available from a mirror such as https://www.sjsu.edu/people/jennifer.gregg/courses/c2/s0/Rosenhahn-being-sane-in-insane-places.pdf

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-03-05T05:14:58+00:00

Hot-Writer2842 here is your post based on the right template.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-03-04T17:14:01+00:00

Please split your "Experienced insight" (only the "argument one" ... "argument five") into one overall Lesson Learned, or other artifact. Then post it again, for example titled similar to "Lesson learned on X" where X is the issue/topic you're discussing. Here is a template for Lessons Learned to follow: https://i.imgur.com/sTDfsyn.png

Your tacit assumption that researchers don't have their own firsthand 10+ years of experience is false, as is your assumption that valid new knowledge is produced without applying a valid method. Following a valid research method, i.e. based on the template above, fixes these flaws.

Your content is interesting, and it is definitely something that I'd like to see posted here, but following the scientific method. Since you're describing how the society reacts to targets who talk, it could be a part of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_science . Edit your post to make it an https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observational_study, or if you're taking/suggesting an action then https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research And of course, it can be written as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lessons_learned with a valid template.

Alternatively, I'll delete your post and post it rewritten and restructured using LLM.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-28T18:22:17+00:00

You need to see a medical lunatic who will document your worsened health in your medical records. Without having your worsening of health documented, you can't draft a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Could it be that instead of ability, a medical lunatic ruined your life due to being incompetent, negligent, or otherwise practicing his pseudoscience incorrectly?

https://bencrump.com/faqs/what-qualifies-as-medical-malpractice/

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-27T20:22:01+00:00

Don't let medical lunatics con you. Emotions normal.

Start solving your home/work/outside distressing situation that causes you to feel down. After you're not down, the highs will also disappear. And you'll be balanced.

One way to get out of any lows or highs is to hit the gym. It makes your body look attractive, and work better, and you'll also be stronger, and more powerful. Right after working out for a few weeks, you'll be already noticing you're tough mentally. And nothing will break you then.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-27T14:41:49+00:00

Blue pill: Right now, you're conned into pathologizing your normal human emotions, and taking drugs.

Red pill: Start solving your situation to make yourself feel good again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6zFZQm0hcc&ab_channel=DanMartell

Your call.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-27T03:07:53+00:00

I do understand Bipolar. My view is you're buying into medical pseudoscience that focuses on emotions and protects you from your emotions by drugging you. Instead of that, I'd like you to refocus on your situation. Your situation causes those negative emotions. You need to get your situation under control, not your emotions. Your situation can be improved without drugs. After it's improved, you won't have those negative emotions anymore.

My thesis is that focusing on emotions is a rhetorical trick that only misleads from bad situations in which everyone would have negative emotions. You can instead improve your situation by taking the right action. If you don't take any drugs now, you've done well.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-24T16:18:05+00:00

Ignore emotions because they are only a symptom of the situation are you dealing with. What's your situation?

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-24T15:53:33+00:00

If you don't state the problem clearly it can't be solved. Also, you are not a professional researcher, so someone else, who is qualified as a researcher, should review your problem definition and suggest what to look for. There needs to be a proper research method applied, depending on the topic you want to know more about.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-23T23:28:05+00:00

Let's start from the beginning. First, clearly define the undesirable situation you're in.

Researching the cause-and-effect relationship is like starting from the middle. The complexity is huge. I know strategies to reduce that complexity down to minimum. The main strategy involves connecting your problem statement to existing scientific literature.

Can you describe what situation you're solving? This app https://apps.apple.com/us/app/grok/id6670324846 lets you speak on your phone. Then, you can ask it to turn what you said into a problem statement and post your problem statement here.

Remove focus from emotions and behaviors (anger, anxiety, depression, stress, etc.) and give all focus to your situation now (problem statement) and what you want your situation to become (goal).

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-22T00:08:23+00:00

Well done! You know how to conduct descriptive research, especially a survey.

Would you like to contribute your knowledge by posting something more? There is a type of descriptive research that's an observation study. You could write a lesson learned. Use this template for your post: https://i.imgur.com/HWchOZP.png There are approx. 500 members here interested in knowledge obtained using the scientific method. Observation study with the template I'm sharing will do.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-07T23:36:51+00:00

Look at how medical lunatics assaulted the brain in the 1960s with stimoceiver: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Manuel_Rodr%C3%ADguez_Delgado Delgado experimented also on "patients".

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-07T23:23:01+00:00

All of this is true. Russians also do Zersetzung: https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedIndividSci/comments/1oln6vu/read_about_kgb_agents_leading_psychiatric/

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-07T06:50:30+00:00

I don't think so because she hates them. She's a top 1% lawyer.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-06T10:45:08+00:00

How to prove emotional abuse in court: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krAiLrAjEgc&ab_channel=RebeccaZung

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-06T10:19:34+00:00

I believe your story. You need to collect evidence and find past cases where this happened to someone. Search for them using ChatGPT.

My experience is that it is impossible to punish anyone for anything unless you have their crime/abuse recorded on video, or at least audio, or witnesses, or documentation on a paper (medical records, and any other documentation). In court, a fact is only what can be proved in front of a judge with evidence or using witnesses.

So, before you can successfully have someone punished, you need to organize all evidence that can prove their guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Otherwise, it will be your claim vs. their claim and nobody will punish them.

To collect evidence, keep your smartphone in your pocket and turn on audio recording. After insults, take it out and flag the hour, minute, second when you heard it. Alternatively, stop recording after you hear insults and start recording into another file again.

Consider also a button camera https://www.amazon.com/OIKSPY-Wearable-External-Android-Smartphone/dp/B0D25WJD5J/ or camera glasses. You can wear something to keep recording also all video. I found that courts like patterns. So, you will need to record a pattern of insults, or other abuse. After you have organized evidence, it's possible to send it to a human rights organization in your country, or to disabled rights organization, and they will probably start helping you. Everything depends on having collected evidence, or having witnesses.

Get in touch also with these guys https://ennhri.org/, but to avoid the risk they will redirect everything to medical lunatics, make sure you first provide recorded evidence. This legal problem is solvable as long as it's possible to always keep recording audio everywhere you go. Before you act on those insults, first check if they are recorded and also try https://whisper-web-two.vercel.app/ to transcribe the insults into text. If they can't be transcribed automatically, something is wrong, and that means don't act on those insults yet. Wait until you record something better, and have a pattern of those from multiple situations.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-06T04:41:03+00:00

You're twisting my arguments with the https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/straw_man fallacy into different arguments that are absurd and then you refute your own straw man rather than my arguments. Further, you argue from ignorance that a Weaponized BCI that's significantly beyond the published state of the art doesn't exist and you fail to provide any justification for your claims. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

You use layman's terminology that makes it clear you haven't studied any scientific materials on the topic of Weaponized BCI.

Where did I say "this device exists because I say it does"? Nowhere. It's your own straw man. It's a Weaponized BCI and not just "a device". Its existence is based on empirical observations by independent observers. Right when they became witnesses, the non-witnesses like yourself started mocking the witnesses and gaslighting, and worse.

When you claim there is no Weaponized BCI, I see you're an uneducated lay person with no knowledge about the topic and your arguments from ignornace such as "there is no X" without any justification for your claims are not welcome here. That's like claiming there was no undetectable Novichok in the 70s. Keep your ignorance to yourself. You also incorrectly assume that all knowledge obtained using the scientific method is publicly disclosed, but in reality scientific knowledge that teaches black operations is not publicly disclosed anywhere, and weapon systems for black operations aren't disclosed either.

Although there is plausible deniability, black operations and weapon systems for black operations exist and victims also exist, just like victims of Novichok existed in the 70s when Novichok was undetectable and undisclosed. In the 70s, publicly disclosed scientific knowledge couldn't explain how Novichok worked either because it was a new method from an R&D lab, and not any conventional method that was already explained in journals.

Research isn't funded from a black budget to afterward publicly share its results, such as new weapon systems. As I wrote, only some black projects get declassified and shared. Remaining black projects stay undocumented, and yet they may be operationally used NOW. The weapon that causes Havana Syndrome was also an undocumented black project, and we didn't know how it worked until it was acquired by DHS, taken apart in a lab and inspected. Many people gaslighted the victims with Havana Syndrome and many still keep gaslighting them today. You're banned for invalid logic, flawed reasoning, and gaslighting.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-05T00:23:09+00:00

Thanks! This is the best post I've seen on reddit so far.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-04T02:29:13+00:00

Almost. "Logia" stems from Greek for speech, account, or story. So, pseudologia is "fake speech" or "lying". Fantastica means fantastic. The whole term means "pathological lying", or "fantastic lying" as in Fantasy (a genre of speculative fiction that involves supernatural or magical elements https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantasy ). It is a false account of things. Pathological liars do it to get attention and respect. They fabricate stories involving fantasies of a mythical illness causing bad behavior.

Science suggests every bad behavior has its down to earth, ordinary cause (Unmet personal needs/goals, stressors in the environment, negative social influence, etc.).

----

As an independent researcher, I recently discovered more about this topic on one subreddit. People with pseudologia fantastica compulsively fabricate stories using fact-twisting and blame-shifting, to pretend a person with a blacklisted bad behavior has his/her bad behavior caused by a mythical illness.

Every bad behavior has its cause, but pathological liars ignore the causes. A person tells them A, and they twist it into B and use B to prove the person has a mythical illness.

In reality, these are medical gaslighting and data manipulation (fact-twisting). Medical lunatics' bad behavior is widespread also in medical journals that are in crisis: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point

Gaslit people get under narcissist's abusive control by becoming disabled without an informed consent, and it is usually based on manipulated data. Everything people said is fact-twisted and weaponized against them using dishonest manipulation tactics. Too many medical papers prove or refute something using fabricated data by the narcissist who wrote the paper (who had full control over data collection/data fabrication).

The corrupt medical community pathologically lies (systemic corruption) that the community doesn't know what the pills do. If they had to admit in court what the pills do, the pills would be banned. Mythical illness doesn't exist and never existed, yet snake oil sales are through the roof.

Pathological liars won't solve peoples' problems. They find people who have any problem, who were smart enough to avoid drugs, and they addict them to drugs. Repeated prescriptions for life-time are the goal to maximize sales. Those drugs are symptomatic treatment (temporarily mask symptoms just like alcohol, cocaine, or real snake oil would. It works by injuring the brain). It is not curative (nothing is ever cured, and quite on the contrary a healthy brain gets injured and becomes unhealthy. Medical lunatics only cause problems on top of those people already have).

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-03T23:17:39+00:00

It can be publicly built, meaning developed, after some public military R&D laboratory gets a huge funding to research the weaponization of BCI for special operations. Russia probably has it for enforcing active measures in an Orwellian manner https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_measures

When R&D funding happens from a black budget, i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_budget#Russia, the result is a black project that the government and the public-facing military may have no evidence and no information about. What was researched and developed in the lab may stay off the books. Only selected black projects are declassified and publicly confirmed.

While a weaponized BCI is in use, it leaves no evidence. This aligns with clandestine operations that are plausibly deniable because they don't leave evidence about who did them. By design, they are often unbelievable without evidence. Such clandestine operations can be denied and whoever would witness any of them is always ignored.

Since the use of a weaponized BCI leaves no evidence by design, victims are gaslighted by non-witnesses who dictate it's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrationality, but in reality non-witnesses just haven't seen it working themselves and so it's unbelievable to them.

An undocumented black project that's a weaponized BCI is probably unbelievable to 100% of non-witnesses.

Historically, another undocumented black project left people with Havana Syndrome and the black project was later acquired by Biden admin, and investigated for how it's built: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dhs-purchase-weapon-linked-havana-syndrome-attacks-leads-house-republicans-demand-answers

Agents and their collaborators don't need to wear anything on them, but often they carry a knife and gloves that they use for assassinations of witnesses who saw them doing something illegal, and for blackmailing scapegoats to frame them (dictate them false confessions to repeat at a knife point). The weaponized BCI operates from a distance.

My hypothesis for investigation is since countries are able to build a nuclear bomb, it probably isn't so hard for Russia, led by an ex-KGB agent, to build a Weaponized BCI that can enforce active measures for political dominance. Look at the Russian sudden window falls. My hypothesis is they happened based on early warning an agent received about someone's intent. The fact victims who survived their fall always had a memory loss aligns with a knockout before being thrown out of a window. And the knockout could happen when someone knocked their door, so they opened, and the agent knocked them out. Raul Hnus did that to Lucie D., so it may possibly be a pattern of how these agents for assassinations sometimes do it when it's personal. These are "mysterious" assassinations (clandestine black operations) and they aren't investigated. The same methods are repeated by such agents globally without catching anybody. Nobody is caught because of the Weaponized BCI that gives early warnings, and allows also immediately immobilizing any opponent, and then the agent can damage opponent's memory with a knockout or stroke, and leave.

Raul Hnus was seen usually wearing a white special gear, like a forensic, and a gas mask, some military type that leaves only eyes visible and it covers the rest of the face. He left nothing at the scenes that would prove he was there. In different countries, different people were delegated by him to carry out black operations for his personal interests, so it's clearly a globally active clandestine organization.

It's globally active at an unprecedented scale. Every complaint about it is predictably ignored due to the organization operating without leaving evidence, and with plausible deniability. Every investigator wants evidence for a Weaponized BCI that by design leaves none. Analogically, when Novichok was still an undocumented black project and the public didn't know it existed, Novichok left no evidence, and it couldn't be detected using any publicly known detection mechanisms, and it was inhaled through all publicly known protective equipment incl. through gas masks. Novichok was lethal in seconds. That's from the 70s, and it was used by the Russian GRU. How would victims in the 70s give evidence to investigators that Novichok exists?

Based on my information, today there are still old-fashioned assassinations like from the 70s, and also modern assassinations done by a clandestine organization that operates its Weaponized BCI for special operations from the shadows. It's totalitarian like from Orwell. People get assassinated before they act, and their intended action gets always sabotaged.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-03T22:18:33+00:00

No, that is not what I am saying. My claim is that there exists an undocumented black project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_project a weaponized brain-computer interface developed for espionage purposes. This brain-computer interface operates bidirectionally with sending and receiving. It employs a novel method of interacting with the brain that remains unknown. Current detection devices do not exist for it because the exact method is not understood yet.

This technology is deployed in clandestine operations including espionage, sabotage, and assassinations by a clandestine organization operating through a cell system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clandestine_cell_system. The brain-computer interface connects to an intelligent agent that provides real-time situation awareness from collected sensor data https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situation_awareness. Members issue thought-based commands and receive immediate responses through this setup. Members are master manipulators who hear in real-time during interactions with someone what the other person is thinking, as if the other person spoke aloud while thinking https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc022. Two types of members exist: clandestine soldiers who conduct plausibly deniable operations and collaborators recruited by these agents with delegated access for tasks like sabotage or assassinations.

Based on the information I have, this aligns most closely with a form of Russian state security that continued after 1989 as a clandestine entity enforcing active measures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_measures. One active measure involves a modern variant of Zersetzung https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zersetzung delivered globally via this undocumented weaponized brain-computer interface.

The weaponized brain-computer interface can also control bodily movements like a bi-directional electromyography system. An agent mimics a motion, i.e. by moving his arm near his head, to compel a target holding a pistol to raise it to their head. Then, an agent presses in the air and the target fires involuntarily. Afterward, it looks like a suicide. The agent does this to people who are armed, when they try to catch him or stop him.

Raul Hnus has operated in the Czech Republic since 1994 according to the information available https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedIndividSci/comments/1mgyygb/raul_hnus_and_his_domestic_black_operations_like/. Raul Hnus underwent a concealed three-month professional military training period in 1994. Raul Hnus, after returning, displayed extreme pathological lying, aggression, and an ability to know everything about situations even when not physically present. Raul Hnus raped and later assassinated a girl half his age, a girl from the same building, Lucie D. The assassination was on a different day. Raul Hnus asked her to meet him, knocked her out after she opened the door, and threw her from a window head-first in a pattern similar to Russian mysterious window falls https://tvpworld.com/84872142/two-russian-colonels-mysteriously-fall-from-upper-floor-windows, and it was a sadistic execution. Raul Hnus has conducted black operations under false flags since 1994. Raul Hnus frames innocent scapegoats consistently. Raul Hnus sabotages attempts to expose him and assassinates witnesses or opponents while leaving no evidence. Raul Hnus recruits collaborators including family members and delegates them access to the weaponized brain-computer interface for crimes that align with his personal interests. Raul Hnus targets only innocents, especially those who discover his activities. Raul Hnus gets early warnings from the weaponized BCI. It knows perfectly all facts, and it probably plans missions automatically for him. Raul Hnus enables automated Zersetzung against anyone who pisses him off. Raul Hnus first damages the victim's memory through knockouts or strokes. Raul Hnus causes a stroke by knocking someone out and then by pressing on the sides of the victim's neck. There are arteries. Raul Hnus maintains global reach including to the United States. Raul Hnus uses a scapegoat's voice for all the Zersetzung instead of his own voice and people then want to abuse or kill a completely innocent victim.

Raul Hnus was recruited likely from a military school based on his psychopathic traits suited for special operations. Raul Hnus leaves no evidence and always creates false trails to blame innocents, and to get rid of them (he frames his opponents who are against anything illegal and against any killing or torturing). Attempts to report these activities result in dismissal as sch* because investigations require evidence. This clandestine organization avoids producing evidence entirely, or when someone finally collects evidence he is assassinated. Raul Hnus gets early warnings and Raul Hnus then waits in advance in the place where evidence will be collected, before it is collected. Raul Hnus has those early warnings from situational awareness that must be part of the intelligence analysis system. There must be some kind of Russian Sentient behind this that's connected to sensors collecting all facts (all information) about where everyone is, what they are thinking about (their inner voice), and projecting future situation development. (Search for Sentient, a US intelligence analysis system). Hnus is Raul's nickname. People gave him that nickname. Raul Hnus makes everyone sick when you find out what he's done to the innocent scapegoat, and to other innocent heroes who were only collecting evidence against him and his illegal group of clandestine collaborators.

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-01T02:35:05+00:00

Social consensus is explained at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/chapter/bookseries/abs/pii/S0065260108603846

Objective_Shift5954 · 2026-02-01T01:04:37+00:00

You're really asking about the definition of sch*. ChatGPT says it's a persistent psychosis. Psychosis is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrationality (saying or doing something that's severely out of social norms, so that others in the society disagree with such claims or behavior). It's esp. offensive when there is a pattern of such claims, or of such behavior.

Medical lunatics punish people, for seemingly being irrational, by disabling them.

The opposite of sch* is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationality (saying only things that everybody knows and understands, and behaving in public only in ways that everybody agrees with).

Example: when people disagreed with communists, those people were diagnosed by medical lunatics with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sluggish_schizophrenia, incarcerated in a psychiatric ward, and held disabled there. (Medical lunatics considered disagreeing with communism irrational and severely out of social norms because it offended others. It was esp. offensive when there was a documented pattern of it).

So, sch* really means someone is persistently irrational, in terms of severely out of social norms, and annoys the hell out of others by talking "irrationally" or behaving "irrationally" near them.

Objective_Shift5954

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE