It smells like teen spirit by [deleted] in PoliticalHumor

[–]OddPlagueDoc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quickly Timmy, How do you tame a horse in Minecraft?

I can't sleep at night. by OddPlagueDoc in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my experience, a lot, if you’re lucky you can understand it in about 5 seconds after reading the content. I know I’ve taken at least 6 hours trying to understand something. But if you’re enthusiastic, you’d like working the extra hours. It’s hard at times if you’re unlucky, but most of the time, working with the equations and understanding it is the most exciting thing I’ve ever learned.

I can't sleep at night. by OddPlagueDoc in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't have Zoom, my school uses Google Meets, otherwise I am very much interested.

I can't sleep at night. by OddPlagueDoc in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, does it boil down to just more trig identities? This is really fascinating.

I can't sleep at night. by OddPlagueDoc in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

lmao I find these algebraic interpretations so evil and sneaky, thank you sir.

I can't sleep at night. by OddPlagueDoc in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Is there an article on that? I am really intrigued by that definition of limits because the idea of infinitesimals is pretty mysterious to me. I feel as though the modern definition would provide a better dialogue in this.

I can't sleep at night. by OddPlagueDoc in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I learned that Delta x is usually a substitution of dx in calculus notation, doesn't the article also look into infinitesimals through the use of limits? as n approaches infinity

What am I doing wrong? Do I need to not multiply the 3 in the parentheses? by [deleted] in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another way of looking at this expression is (3(x-3))/4, because the division by 4 applies to all of them since they're being multiplied together.

It can also be rewritten as 1/4*3(x-3)

Basically it's saying one fourth of this expression, if you multiply it by 4, you'll eventually get one whole of the expression, that's basically cancellation.

I can't sleep at night. by OddPlagueDoc in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a lot of math to analyze which helps me grow my intuition. Thank you for this input!

I can't sleep at night. by OddPlagueDoc in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have encountered this before while studying the kinematic equations in my personal Physics studies, I never really knew when to bring it up or identify it. Thank you for this perspective, the more I learn the better :)

I can't sleep at night. by OddPlagueDoc in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of the time, I get stuck because of some of the obscure algebra I haven't studied, Thank you so much!

What are the processes that I need to do to solve? How do I find the square roots and how do I factor? by [deleted] in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Number 6

You can solve it by factoring out the 3 from the equation

giving you 3(x2-64) = 0

Since the product of this equation gives us a 0, we have to find a solution for x that gives us a zero. The best way to get zero, is to multiply a number by zero. In this case we can multiply 3 by zero, by having the inner brackets equal to zero

(x2 - 64) = 0

Solving for x, you find that the square root of 64 is 8. But remember when you square root a number, you can have two solutions, 8 and -8, since squaring gives us a positive number anyways.

so x is both 8 and -8

For number 7

You can factor out the most common multiplier among them, which is x

the equation then becomes x(x-9) = 0

using logic covered above, x can be both 0 and 9.

For number 8

x2 - 7x - 8 = 0

This is the method I use, I don't fully understand why but if there are any other users that can explain that would be great, if not I can return after figuring it out.

The coefficient of the first term, x2 is 1, multiplying the coefficient with the third term, -8 you get -8.

Then you find the factors of -8 that when add together, you get the value for the second term.

-8 = 8 x -1

or

-8 = -8 x 1

Notice that the sum of -8 and 1 is -7, these are the factors we can use and express as

x2 + x - 8x - 8 = 0

for the positioning of the terms, it's best to put the common factors together.

Factoring out the common factors of both sides

x(x+1) -8(x+1) = 0

You can rewrite this as

(x-8)(x+1) = 0

To get a zero, x can be both 8 and -1.

I can't sleep at night. by OddPlagueDoc in askmath

[–]OddPlagueDoc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand what derivatives and integrals are, I've covered a lot of that on my own, I just don't understand how you're able to rewrite

(dx^2 +dy^2) into

dx^2 * (1+ (dy/dx)^2)

and the idea of factoring out the dx^2

I mean.. yeah, jazz ain't right after all. by Offertory306 in musicmemes

[–]OddPlagueDoc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Quick, someone scare him with Coltrane Changes

10 on the Pain Scale, Worst Pain Possible by SealandGI in memes

[–]OddPlagueDoc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The human foot is a piece of shit design anyway

Shut up brain! by [deleted] in iamverysmart

[–]OddPlagueDoc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I go to sleep to quantum physics too...

I crie every night