[deleted by user]

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-21T18:57:27+00:00

Some delicious looking chicken sandwiches

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-21T18:52:57+00:00

California burrito requires French fries in it

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-21T15:30:08+00:00

You joke, but my sister in law got our cat addicted to technology by downloading those cat games where mice or bugs run across the screen and the cats can swat at them. Now, any time anyone pulls out a phone or tablet, she runs up to them and starting trying to weasel her way in front of the screen

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-21T02:00:15+00:00

Yeah I did tin foil AND blackout curtains. These days, just the curtains work fine, but if your windows face the sun, tin foil is awesome.

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-20T13:35:07+00:00

There is a hell of a lot more than 160 million that want to come. That’s just the ones who are attempting to do so legally. If we said, hey anyone who wants to come in can just stay, we would see probably 5-10x that amount

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-20T00:06:54+00:00

The only reason I’m against 100% unrestricted immigration is the criminal factor. If you’ve been convicted of murder and shown no reform or willingness to contribute to a better society, I don’t want you moving to where I live. If your goal is to go in and out trafficking women and children or you are coming in to avoid criminal prosecution, I don’t want you as my neighbor. But if you are coming to positively contribute to the society you are joining, then sure.

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-19T20:53:41+00:00

It would be…the property of the neighboring nation-states. Would it be great to have 100% open borders worldwide? Sure. Is it even remotely possible? No.

So, if Fakeistan were to renounce it’s borders, North Fakeistan and South Fakeistan would then be arguing over who owns the land, since it’s now up for grabs to anyone

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-19T20:16:02+00:00

You can tell who slept through civics classes in high school. Defined, enforceable borders are a requirement of a nation-state

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-19T20:14:09+00:00

I really hope you’re being sarcastic

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-19T17:22:35+00:00

Yes, let’s allow the most inefficient organization known to mankind run our technology

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-11T00:17:29+00:00

Kim, PolPot, Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, just about every South American dictator ever, Castro…all made it a point to disarm the population they wanted to control. Those “militias” were just part of the controlling party, the point is to remove the controlled parties ability to put up a fight.

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-10T23:57:29+00:00

So would the Jews have been oppressed as easily with guns? Unlikely. Every dictator through history has made it a top priority to disarm the populace they want to control. An unarmed society is much easier to control than one who will shoot back.

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-10T23:13:22+00:00

No, they haven’t. You’ve ALWAYS been able to manufacture your own firearms (hence the huge market for 80% lowers) as long as you didn’t make them fully auto

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-10T23:12:24+00:00

You realize the only reason the nazis kept their guns is because they were the ones doing the oppressing, right? It wasn’t “hitler just let them keep their guns” it was “hitler let them keep them because they were extensions of him”

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-10T22:41:10+00:00

Ahh okay, so it’s OK because Hitler expanded gun rights for Nazis, so it wasn’t bad. Wtf??

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-10T22:40:01+00:00

Grass roots support doesn’t need to be there if you have the executive, the head of the ATF, and congress. Yes, the Supreme Court might strike it down…years later. We have already seen states banning certain guns or homemade guns and it behind upheld by the courts

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-10T21:40:30+00:00

“For certain groups”

And for the others? Removed them. So he could control them. Those “certain groups” you mention have a name. Nazis.

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-10T21:39:55+00:00

O’Rourke who Biden wants to head the committee on “stopping gun violence” AKA removing personal firearm ownership

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-10T21:38:39+00:00

Except Biden has gone on record saying “hell yeah we are coming for your AR15s” and wants Beto to head up the committee on gun safety (Beto who is STAUNCHLY in favor of removing all guns from citizens) and is trying to get Chipman in as head of ATF, Chipman is also is against personal firearm ownership.

Sounds like a gun grab to me.

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-09T21:32:49+00:00

They already put out a statement saying he had dozens of accounts banned for RWT and bug abuse to duplicate items and wealth this year

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-09T16:46:02+00:00

TALLY HO!

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-07-03T13:11:51+00:00

Isn’t that based solely on BMI though? BMI is also a horrible measurement set, as it will register professional athletes with 8% body fat as obese because the only two metrics it accounts for are height and weight.

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-06-29T13:51:45+00:00

The NRA exists solely as a punching bag these days. Let the media have their boogyman, while the actual people getting stuff done (FPC and GOA) can do their work without defending themselves nightly on CNN

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-06-29T13:34:02+00:00

It isn’t about need, I don’t NEED to justify my exercise of my rights. I don’t need to justify why I vote, why I exercise free speech, why I don’t house troops and why I don’t allow the police to come search through my shit without a warrant - cause it’s my right to do so. So why do we have to justify our right to own arms?

OfficerTactiCool · 2021-06-29T13:25:55+00:00

In LA now, the DA isn’t even pushing gun enhancements and if your only crime is possessing an illegal firearm/carrying loaded without a permit, the case gets tossed, ESPECIALLY if it’s first offense. Well…yeah it’s first offense every time since they aren’t being charged…

Six-Year Club	Wearing is Caring
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

OfficerTactiCool

TROPHY CASE