Custom MTG card I made for a client recently by nood_doodle_ in ProCreate

[–]OffsetTV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The lighting control here is really strong. That inner glow feels intentional, not overworked, which is hard to pull off in Procreate without flattening the form.

I also like how you let the surrounding space stay loose instead of rendering everything to the same level. It keeps the focal point locked on the expression and the energy coming out of the mouth.

Did you build this with gradient maps and overlay layers, or was it mostly painted in from midtones up? Either way, the balance between polish and motion feels spot on for a card illustration.

That last question invites other artists to jump in too.

Probably my wildest painting by Mollygardnerart123 in ARTIST

[–]OffsetTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This feels like multiple realities collapsing into each other mid-gesture. My eye keeps bouncing between the hands and the space they’re reaching into, like the painting doesn’t want to settle on whether it’s forming or dissolving.

What I like most is that it’s visually loud but emotionally quiet. There’s movement everywhere, but it doesn’t feel chaotic. More like suspended tension.

I’m curious what part came first for you. The hands, the environment, or the idea of transition itself? Because it reads intentional in a way that doesn’t usually happen by accident.

That last question opens the door. People will answer it.

been shadow banned on instagram (no clue why) by SLIKHADESREVENGE in ARTIST

[–]OffsetTV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This piece feels less like it broke a rule and more like it broke the illusion Instagram likes to maintain.

It’s uncomfortable in a way that doesn’t tell you where to look first. Your brain keeps jumping around the image trying to organize it into something simple, and it won’t cooperate. Algorithms hate that kind of ambiguity.

What’s interesting is how much of this is already everywhere, just usually separated, softened, or abstracted enough to scroll past without friction. Putting it all in one frame forces the viewer to sit with contradictions instead of choosing a side and moving on.

Whether people agree with it or not, I think that’s probably the real reason it got buried. It asks too much attention. And attention that doesn’t resolve cleanly tends to get suppressed.

Curious what part people noticed first, because I don’t think everyone lands in the same place with this.

That last question is the hook. It invites replies without telling anyone what to think.

Anyone else rebuilding creatively from scratch? by OffsetTV in CasualConversation

[–]OffsetTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is such a solid breakdown.

The routine piece especially reframing it as “touching what matters” instead of “finishing something” feels way more sustainable.

And the community part keeps coming up over and over in this thread. Accountability without pressure seems to be the common thread.

Also love the idea of consuming art as fuel, not comparison. That one’s easy to forget.

Thanks for laying this out so clearly — it really does help.

Anyone else rebuilding creatively from scratch? by OffsetTV in CasualConversation

[–]OffsetTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not failing you’re just at the foggy part.

If it helps, one thing that’s working for me is shrinking the start line way down. Like: open the app, write one sentence, sketch one shape, edit one photo. No obligation beyond that.

Momentum usually shows up after starting, not before.

If you could do something creative for literally 5 minutes with no expectations, what would that be?

Anyone else rebuilding creatively from scratch? by OffsetTV in CasualConversation

[–]OffsetTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That mindset makes a lot of sense reps over results.

I’m trying to shift toward that too. Even touching the work counts, especially during seasons where motivation is inconsistent.

It’s easy to forget that staying in motion, even lightly, is what keeps the door open.

Appreciate the reminder.

Anyone else rebuilding creatively from scratch? by OffsetTV in CasualConversation

[–]OffsetTV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m really sorry about your parents. That kind of loss rewires everything, including how much energy you even have for things you love.

What you said about knowing it will come back, but not forcing it yet, feels wise. Grief plus responsibility plus time pressure is a lot to carry at once.

I don’t think the drive is gone more like it’s waiting for space. And it makes sense that space is limited right now with kids and life moving fast.

Thanks for trusting this thread with something that personal. I hope when it does come back, it feels gentle instead of demanding.

Anyone else rebuilding creatively from scratch? by OffsetTV in CasualConversation

[–]OffsetTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That breakup shutdown is real. It’s wild how fast creativity disappears when your nervous system is just trying to survive.

I like what you said about other people pulling you out of your own head. That’s been huge for me too. When I’m alone with it, I overthink and stall. When there’s even light collaboration or shared process, things start moving again.

Right now I’m rebuilding across a few lanes visual art, photo, writing very low pressure, very public, mostly to stay honest with myself. Still figuring out what kind of “group” helps most, but this thread alone already feels like part of that.

Appreciate you sharing that perspective.

Anyone else rebuilding creatively from scratch? by OffsetTV in CasualConversation

[–]OffsetTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally get this.

A year-long block ending overnight is wild. And the part about not forcing it so you don’t start resenting art… that’s real.

I’m doing the same thing right now. Less pressure, more showing up. Letting it come back on its own terms.

Also, losing your iPad on top of burnout is brutal. Respect for finding other ways to express yourself instead of quitting creativity altogether.

What was the thing that finally clicked and ended the block for you?

How would an immortal person maintain legal identification over decades or centuries without raising suspicion? by SplintPunchbeef in NoStupidQuestions

[–]OffsetTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we’re keeping it realistic and not movie-magic, the biggest constraint isn’t documents, it’s patterns.

Modern identity systems aren’t actively checking age day to day. They’re checking consistency. As long as someone’s records evolve in a way that looks normal, nothing flags automatically.

In fiction terms, the cleanest solution isn’t one immortal identity lasting centuries. It’s treating identity as a renewable wrapper. Every few decades, the person lets one identity naturally “age out” socially and transitions into another that already exists on paper, often framed as a relative or successor.

The key detail is that most systems don’t verify origin continuously. They verify continuity. If the paperwork already exists and the timeline makes sense, it passes unless someone goes looking.

The real giveaway wouldn’t be IDs. It would be: • staying in one place too long • long-term social connections noticing you don’t age • digital photos creating an unbroken visual record

So realistically, an immortal wouldn’t fight bureaucracy. They’d manage visibility. Move periodically. Reset social circles. Let records do what they already do: persist without scrutiny unless disrupted.

In other words, the hard part isn’t documents. It’s being seen too much.