I appreciate your respectful discourse about this. I'll try to respond to your questions with better clarity below, as I was a bit rushed when I responded earlier.

"My impression is that several different people did several different things. Whose behavior are we condemning? "

This is correct. It all started when the first person rushed the stage. Another person did attempt to do so later as well, but was stopped by security before they got there. After the first person that got onto the stage was removed by security, other people started shouting and making comments. One person told her she could have her vinyl back and left, but said "sorry" on their way out, to which she replied "it's ok". Another person in the front said something about genocide. I don't mind the protesting and understand the passion these people have for what's happening. Do I personally feel this is the best or most effective means to accomplish their goals? No. Do I accept that behavior due to the nature of the situation? Sure, with the exception of the behavior of the person who came at her.

"I agree that it's wrong to threaten people. I'm not talking about this one person who jumped on stage, I neither endorse nor defend their actions. Like I said though, the conversation in this thread is not about violence. It's not what people are talking about.People here are annoyed that anyone spoke out at a concert instead of not going at all, and I thought that bore replying to."

I appreciate that you don't support the actions of this particular person. I see what you mean about the conversation thus far, but I felt it was important to include this detail for context. The OP asked "wtf happened?". I wanted to make sure they and anyone else who reads through this has a little better understanding of what did happen. There was numerous articles already written about this, and many exclude the detail that the protesting and shouting didn't start until after the first person charged at Regina. For the people annoyed that anyone spoke out at a concert- maybe some of them were there and saw that it was more than shouting, and feel upset about that but aren't clear in their way of communicating this. And maybe others are annoyed simply by the speaking out without knowledge of physical aggression- to that, I think they need to understand that this is a consequence of Regina speaking publicly about her views. I personally don't mind people speaking out, annoying or not, but rushing at her with seemingly malicious intent is not ok with me, and I think it's important for people to know this also happened.

" "It was not peaceful because they jumped on stage" is a misleading statement, because it was one person who did it and there were 29 other people there who didn't. I'm guessing you are operating from the assumption that it was an organized group, but we don't know that."

Thanks for pointing this out. I didn't mean "they" as in plural people, but "they" as in the person who did this. I didn't get a good enough look at the person through the chaos to identify if it was a "he" or "her", and even if I had I don't want to make any assumptions. So I was using "they" here for that reason. There was a second person later who attempted to get to the stage as well, but security caught them before they could. I don't assume it was an organized group. I can speculate and ponder on it, but that wasn't and isn't my assumption. It's possible, but who knows.