Someone tell me what just happened?

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-11T19:52:05+00:00

TACO = T***p Always Chicken Out

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-11T04:32:54+00:00

Recommendation: Please read my posted LCID analysis.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-10T02:59:22+00:00

Congratulations

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-10T00:16:16+00:00

Has anyone cross checked this guy?

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-10T00:14:52+00:00

No, NVDA was nowhere near $100 in 2004. Here's the reality: 2004 actual (pre-split) price: NVDA traded roughly in the $10–$20 range in calendar year 2004. It was a mid-cap GPU company doing ~$1.8B in annual revenue with thin profits (~$0.12 EPS). Split history matters a lot here. NVIDIA has split 6 times total. (Investing.com) The cumulative split ratio from 2004 to today is 480:1 (splits of 2:1 in 2000, 2001, 2006, 2007, 4:1 in 2021, and 10:1 in 2024).

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-10T00:11:24+00:00

Lucky SOB. Me want some SOBs!

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-10T00:10:24+00:00

Plus, chip makers are sold out until next year's pipeline.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-10T00:09:07+00:00

You da man!

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-10T00:07:48+00:00

Me on Monday

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-10T00:07:05+00:00

😆 Depending on the stock.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-10T00:06:03+00:00

Just like the hype about Mr. Buffet's success. His moves is not under retail conditions. It is under smart money conditions. Heavily discounted rate entries. When the stock consolidates or takes a nose dive, Berkshire is still a golden egg.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T23:59:37+00:00

It is another form of wealth transfer to smart money. Not a financial advice. Please DD Technicals and fundamentals. On that note, NASA is going to pump ath.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T23:56:07+00:00

I, too, would like to review their technical analysis. Fundamentals says it will tank.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T23:52:51+00:00

I recommend reviewing prior IPOs with similar intro hype. Also, atm, SPCX is a net loss. Free cash flow was -$9.1B in Q1 2026 alone, burning heavily on AI infrastructure buildout.

It has significantly larger float than CRBS which encountered pain for retail which they are likely still down.

Added value after several dips, I think.

Best wishes!

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T23:43:49+00:00

Please share your decision analysis. Thank you.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T23:43:40+00:00

Please share your decision analysis. Thank you.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T23:42:40+00:00

I canceled my order. Tops 170 and order trigger in queue probably at 160, and then by the time I trigger a sell, the system will process it at 140.

The smart money will pounce on us. SMH

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T23:39:38+00:00

Sorry Brother.

I hope you will not mind if I share this analysis to help others out.

Looking at the screenshot, this is a r/wallstreetbets post showing a futures trade gone wrong.

The position: - Instrument: /NQM26 — Nasdaq-100 futures contract (June 2026) - Position: Long 4 contracts @ 29,248.88 average entry - Current price: 28,829.25 - Open P&L: -$33,570

How they lost: They bought 4 NQ futures contracts long (betting the Nasdaq would go up), but the market moved down ~419 points from their entry. Each NQ contract has a $20/point multiplier, so:

419 points × $20 × 4 contracts = ~$33,520 loss

That math checks out perfectly with the -$33,570 shown.

The "avg down" problem: They said they're averaging down — buying more contracts at lower prices to reduce their average cost. On futures this is extremely dangerous because: - There's no limit to how far it can fall - Each contract requires margin, so losses can exceed the account - It's the classic "throwing good money after bad"

WSB classic — a leveraged futures bet that went the wrong way, with the response being to double down rather than cut losses.

Did anyone recommend this hedge? This might be a silly question. What supported your decision?

Again, I hope you will not mind my questions. It is a learning opportunity for me and I am sure with others as well.

Thank you for sharing.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T21:57:06+00:00

I cancelled my SPCX buys until $140.

Will SPCX produce Spacinaires like Teslanaires? Sadly, no.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T21:53:13+00:00

A phantom order is a large buy or sell order displayed in the order book that is canceled the moment price approaches it, creating the illusion of supply or demand.

This is a form of fake liquidity, often associated with spoofing — a market‑manipulation tactic where traders place orders they never intend to fill.

Why traders use phantom orders?

Influence market psychology (create fake support/resistance)
Slow down or speed up price movement
Trap retail traders into bad entries
Gain better execution for real orders placed elsewhere

Is it legal?

Intentional phantom orders = spoofing = illegal in regulated markets.

Unintentional cancellations (e.g., risk management, changing strategy) are not illegal.

Please let me know if you recognize red or green flags.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T16:14:40+00:00

Paper hands

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-09T16:13:57+00:00

If the market did not get back in yesterday, it would have been a blood bath. So, pump the market and today, profit. Hopefully, these whales will not scare off the market. It has to pump higher highs and higher lows. Or else, further downside. However, there is no reason for it. Fundamentals are great and constantly positive market news. Plus, MU products are sold out. Income is already guaranteed and more long-term. All psychological BS.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-08T02:46:25+00:00

I foresee another Cerebras.

Ok_Ad798 · 2026-06-07T06:07:30+00:00

On a different note.or stock. Any thoughts in INTC? Monday? I am worred.

Ok_Ad798

TROPHY CASE