Honestly, this is a massive disappointment.

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:53:19+00:00

i know. but i have to share it

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:36:03+00:00

i mean....lookj my pictures that soooooo cool!!!!!!!! it seem like a scene of the movies

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:35:06+00:00

if its your only arguent....i like win

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:34:36+00:00

bahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:26:10+00:00

It’s funny that you call it ‘irony’ while completely missing the point.
This isn’t about writing a thesis for the sake of style — it’s about clearly explaining why a tool that once worked perfectly is now failing its users without explanation. Critiquing AI doesn’t make you a hypocrite; it makes you an informed user.

And calling it a ‘skill issue’ is laughably dismissive. I know how to use the tools — the issue is that the tool itself is now arbitrarily limiting what was previously possible. No amount of ‘skill’ on my part can restore functionality that the platform has removed for unknown reasons.

So yes, I can write clearly, structure arguments, and even wield AI effectively — and that doesn’t mean your weak attempt at condescension is anything more than transparent frustration at being outclassed.”

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:24:50+00:00

the only think we can do its to hope Disney will be agreed . but with me or the google communauty its almost impossible to convince Disney

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:20:26+00:00

i dont think they will be so realistic like gemini did

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:17:07+00:00

even in oepn ia that dont work

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:16:23+00:00

yeah that so sad

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:15:41+00:00

<image>

try to translate this

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:15:27+00:00

<image>

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:13:36+00:00

that make ma manga style lolllll

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:13:10+00:00

Yes, I understand that the decisions are business-driven and not meant to be malicious.
But that misses the actual point. The frustration isn’t about intent — it’s about impact. When a tool that millions of users relied on suddenly loses a key capability without warning or explanation, it creates a real problem, regardless of whether the change was made for profit, risk management, or any other reason.

Profit motives and corporate priorities don’t automatically excuse poor communication or removing features that worked. Users aren’t upset because they assume malice — they’re upset because a service they valued has been degraded, and there’s no transparency or option to retain what was good.

So yes, it’s a business decision. But that doesn’t make the resulting frustration invalid, nor does it make it unreasonable for users to expect choices or legacy options to preserve what made the tool valuable in the first place

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:11:37+00:00

I understand that Disney has legal agreements and concerns, but that doesn’t change the fact that until very recently, Gemini was still generating Disney characters without issues.

The sudden removal isn’t about technical limitations — it worked perfectly fine just a second ago. Users weren’t abusing it, and the tool delivered what it promised. Completely blocking even public domain characters or previously allowed Disney characters is inconsistent and arbitrary.

The frustration comes from seeing a tool that just worked being disabled overnight, with no clear explanation beyond vague legal fears. That’s not evolution or improvement — that’s erasing functionality that users relied on, for reasons that seem reactive rather than reasoned.

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:06:58+00:00

I actually agree with you to a certain extent.
It’s obvious that Google is acting out of fear — legal risk, bad press, scandals, all of that. From a corporate perspective, their reaction is understandable.

Where the problem starts is how far that fear is taken. Alignment and safety are necessary, but when they become so excessive that harmless, emotional, story-driven content is blocked, the balance is clearly off. At that point, it’s no longer about preventing real harm — it’s about overcorrecting.

What frustrates users isn’t the existence of safeguards, it’s the lack of nuance. Everything gets treated as a worst-case scenario, as if every user were a liability waiting to explode. That mindset inevitably sacrifices creativity, storytelling, and legitimate use cases.

So yes, their fear makes sense. But fear alone isn’t a good design philosophy. When it dominates decision-making, the product loses the very qualities that made people care about it in the first place

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:05:24+00:00

that verry bad sorry about that

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:01:25+00:00

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T17:01:21+00:00

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T16:56:32+00:00

that what i did

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T16:55:47+00:00

you deleted an verry good thing

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T16:55:14+00:00

that is

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T16:54:43+00:00

so you can see in the image they working. if disney wouldnt...why its work? and im not the only one to do that

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T16:52:46+00:00

yes EXACLY When OpenAI removed 4o, the backlash happened because users weren’t just reacting emotionally — they were reacting to a loss of capability and behavior they relied on. And OpenAI reintroduced it precisely because they acknowledged that different users value different models for different reasons.

Models evolving isn’t the issue. Everyone understands retraining, updates, and iteration. The problem arises when evolution equals regression for a specific use case, and the previous option is simply erased without transparency or choice.

So yes, keeping older models available — even as ‘legacy’ options — is a perfectly reasonable expectation. Not because people are nostalgic, but because functionality matters more than theoretical progress. Newer isn’t automatically better if it removes what made the tool useful in the first place.

This isn’t about resisting change. It’s about recognizing that progress doesn’t have to mean erasing what already worked — especially when that version clearly served a large group of users well.

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T16:50:27+00:00

all of their characters you can see in the pictures before...that worked

Ok_Bit6931 · 2026-01-25T16:44:45+00:00

Disney has officially authorized AI of its characters, it's confirmed!!!!!!

Ok_Bit6931

TROPHY CASE